Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The essay john locke
An esaay on punishment
An esaay on punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The nature of man has and will always be debated throughout our lifetime, some novelists and philosophers believe in the mixture of humans being entirely corrupt or moral. The book The Road by Cormac McCarthy is an apocalyptic story of a journey where a father and his son carefully tread their way across a very treacherous version of our Earth. Throughout their journey, the father and the son see the truth behind the inhumanity of which times of chaos causes. The theme of The Road is closely related to the explanation of John Locke’s, where he explains humans are pure from origin, but human choices in life are what corrupt us in the end. McCarthy incorporates this theme into the story with the actions of young child who chooses to help all …show more content…
who are in need, and a father, who makes challenging decisions for the best possible outcome for himself and his son in the means of survival. Cormac McCarthy directs the reader to the child’s purity by providing events or occurrences where the boy constantly thinks of others, such as the people on the road, or people on the road who might want to harm him.
No matter what it is the child tries to help others without thinking of consequences. While on the road, the son spots a small figure on the distant road that was “bent and shuffling,” and once they caught up to the figure they found out that it was a “man with no shoes at all” and his feet were “wrapped in rags”(McCarthy 83). While the father called out for the man, the boy’s first instinct was to “put a hand on his shoulder,” look up to his father and say “He’s scared, Papa. The man is scared.”(McCarthy 84). While convincing the father, the son, who has not been negatively influenced by actions or events, has no idea of what dangers or if the man is a trap/ambush which may happen while he is talking to this man and attempting to help him. Another aspect to the child’s purity is when the boy reminds his father that they do not treat others on the road with compassion and goodness like the stories his father tells them to try to keep their spirits up. While the father and son were stuck in a building, the father offered to tell the son a story and instantly and said “No.” with the explanation that the “stories are not true.” and that “in the stories we're always helping people and we don’t help people” (McCarthy 138). The son in this circumstance is unhappy …show more content…
with what decisions the father has made, which were to not help another being, especially the most recent case, where they did not allow the old man to travel with them ensuring the old man’s death. Through the many decisions and actions that the man has faced, he clearly represents the idea of being corrupted through society which is explained by John Locke. Throughout the story the man’s one objective is to keep his son alive, and through this goal he does anything or kills anything as a matter of fact that poses as a threat to them. One morning the man noticed a couple men stopping near where they were sleeping in a diesel truck, the man quickly woke his son up and went to the woods. While in the woods the father and the sun were confronted a man from the diesel truck, the man was holding a knife and in almost an instant “the man fell back instantly and lay with blood bubbling from the hole in his forehead” (McCarthy 34). With no debate to reason or see what the man from the diesel truck was going to do the father with no hesitation shot the man, dead. Another aspect of the corruption of man in The Road are the humans who go to the extreme for their goal, those who take it to the extremes in this case are the cannibals, and their actions have severely corrupted who they are. Whether it is for food or to increase the likeliness of survival the cannibals eat and kill anyone who will be a benefit for them. While the boy’s father was clearing the perimeter, the boy saw something and quickly buried his face against the father, what he saw was “a charred human infant headless and gutted and blackening on the spit” (McCarthy 103). The charring and decapitation is not only immoral but it shows that the cannibals have no emotions at all and all senses of purity from their bodies have vanished. The man and the son represent two different personalities, the son who wants to help all in need, and the man whose mission it is to protect the son.
The man and the boy have conflicting ideologies; the son who only wants to help others, does not realize what the dad needs to do in order to protect him. The dad, through experience knows that not everyone will be as pure as the son, and sacrifices and killing are justified to survive. The dad on the other hand is not completely immoral, such as the time he gave the “tin of fruit cocktail” due to the boy asking him to (McCarthy 84). The act of listening to the son’s opinion which has no harm intention and giving the man food shows that the choices you make reflect who you are, in this case shining on the humane side on the man. The man also realizes that the boy is a powerful force that pushes him to survive every day, whether it is his innocence or his acts of kindness on others. When the boy asked the dad what would happen if he died the dad responds saying, “When you die it's the same as if everybody else did too”(McCarthy 88). If the son were to die, all sense of purity from the dads life will disappear the son dying relates to the idea of what would occur if purity and innocence disappeared in total throughout the earth. If there is no peace and purity on the earth, humans will live in chaos and not have the natural purity that they were born with. In a sense, son’s purity and innocence relate to a higher sense of
motivation for the man and the man stands for the sacrifices you have to make for life itself. In The Road McCarthy supports the theme that humans are pure from origin, but human choices in life are what corrupt us in the end. McCarthy incorporates this theme into the story with the idea of young child who chooses to help all who are in need, and a father, has to make decisions for the reason of survival. McCarthy created this apocalyptic world to debate the real nature of man, where there are many debatable ideas to the nature of man, the world he created with chaos is a great example that leaves the true nature of man up for interpretation.
Are humans natural born sinners? Are we content with our self-indulging human nature? Flannery O’Connor shows us through her stories that the worst quality in a human is selfishness. Through grotesque characters, O’Connor demonstrates the common theme of selfish human nature to display the ability it has to ruin/drive people crazy and that people only look to religion when they are desperate.
He always wants to help someone else in need before himself, whereas the father is only concerned about their own personal wellbeings. He “is the one” who worries about their ethical choices and wants to help a stranger in any way he can (259). McCarthy proves the importance of the boy’s spirit of love for other people when his dad dies and he must take the leap of faith to continue along the road with a new family. Despite all the corrupted people they encountered beforehand, the boy meets someone who is “carrying the fire” (129). This mantra by the father and son, symbolizes hope and humanity. The qualities Steinbeck labels for a writer to create in his writings can be summed up in “carrying the fire” since the two never did give up. It is the greatness of the heart and spirit Steinbeck notes that is “inside [them]. [And] [i]t [is] always there” (279). It is noteworthy that even in the midst of death and ashes, the two are able to hold onto their relationship and sanity. The “good guys” can continue to carry meaning and structure in their lives, even in a time where society turned into a battle to survive on the remnants of
Through the experience of the young character, Bobby, the short story Catapult by J. A McLeod is a good example in which characters in texts are constructed to represent the best and worst qualities in human nature. In this short story, Bobby is constructed to convey just how easily we are able to destroy our innocence and to represent some of the uglier qualities in human nature, like how we crave power, are greedy and how easily we are able to kill if given the power paired with a lapse in judgement. It shows how we would rather pin the blame on something innocent rather than accept our faults and also suggests that our lack of judgement could be our downfall. At the same
In the human nature, naive ignorance of the world's imperfections eventually yields to the recognition that the world does contain hatred and violence. John Knowles places his novel A Separate Peace in situations which necessitate this emotional transformation. The characters become increasingly aware of the nature of the world. In addition, symbols help show the interrelation of ideas and events as they appear in Gene's subconscious mind. In this novel, setting, character, and symbols develop the theme of loss of innocence.
When the man and boy meet people on the road, the boy has sympathy for them, but his father is more concerned with keeping them both alive. The boy is able to get his father to show kindness to the strangers (McCarthy), however reluctantly the kindness is given. The boy’s main concern is to be a good guy. Being the good guy is one of the major reasons the boy has for continuing down the road with his father. He does not see there is much of a point to life if he is not helping other people. The boy wants to be sure he and his father help people and continue to carry the fire. The boy is the man’s strength and therefore courage, but the man does not know how the boy worries about him how the boy’s will to live depends so much on his
What seems to be a positive goal for man to have is actually the opposite, causing men to lose what makes them most different from animals, leaving them cruel and ruthless. To begin, the world where the novel takes place is separated into compounds and pleeblands and is infested with corruption.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Kurt Vonnegut's apocalyptic novel, Cat's Cradle, might well be called an intricate network of paradox and irony. It is with such irony and paradox that Vonnegut himself describes his work as "poisoning minds with humanity...to encourage them to make a better world" (The Vonnegut Statement 107). In Cat's Cradle, Vonnegut does not tie his co-mingled plots into easy to digest bites as the short chapter structure of his story implies. Rather, he implores his reader to resolve the paradoxes and ironies of Cat's Cradle by simply allowing them to exist. By drawing our attention to the paradoxical nature of life, Vonnegut releases the reader from the necessity of creating meaning into a realm of infinite possibility. It appears that Vonnegut sees the impulse toward making a better world as fundamental to the human spirit; that when the obstacle of meaning is removed the reader, he supposes, will naturally improve the world.
Every 60 seconds a person is murdered in the U.S. Yearly there are over 12,000 gun deaths in the United States. The amount of violence in our country is a result of how cruel people can be to each other and the lack of humanity we have as human beings. In the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding there are British boys that were on their way home but they crashed and now have to endure through the challenges the island they are on gives them. The book is representing humanity’s inner nature and shows the reader how different human actions are when bad things happen. A philosopher named John Locke believed that people are born with a blank slate and something bad must happen first in order for someone to be evil. Human nature is usually good but things can always change. The nature of humanity is inherently good because something must happen in order for people to be evil. If you were friends with somebody, something must happen between you two in order for you to hate them.
Although finding food was a struggle for them, the man always put the boy’s health before his. The man made sure the boys thirst and hunger was always gone and that he had food to eat and drinks to drink. “He took the can and sipped it and handed it back. You drink it, he said. Let's just sit here.” (Page 27). In this quote, the man gave the boy the last of the soda but the boy got upset that the man didn’t take any, so the man took a sip and proceeded to give it to the boy. This is important because the father knows that he’s thirsty and could kill for a drink, but he knows that this is the first and last soda the boy would ever get. “He'd found a last half packet of cocoa and he fixed it for the boy and then poured his own cup with hot water and sat blowing at the rim.” (Page 18). This quote shows us too that the man always made sure that the boy got the better part of the deal. The boy got to drink cocoa but the man just drank hot water. The father does this because he got to live through his childhood without this apocalyptic world but the boy only lived a few years that he really doesn’t remember. These quotes show paternal love because they explain how the father always puts the son before him. Through all of the actions the father takes, it shows us how much he really cares about the son, and that his son is his only hope and his fire for
Graham Greene, a Canadian actor, once said, “Human nature is not black and white but black and grey.” Carver brings this quote into light, when he describes the outcome of an argument that a couple has. Carver, the author of “Popular Mechanics,” uses imagery, symbolism, and voice to convey that humanity is inherently bad, violent, evil and in times of darkness. One can easily destroy ones own beautiful creations, but in all it’s just a part of human nature.
The question “What makes us who we are?” has perplexed many scholars, scientists, and theorists over the years. This is a question that we still may have not found an answer to. There are theories that people are born “good”, “evil”, and as “blank slates”, but it is hard to prove any of these theories consistently. There have been countless cases of people who have grown up in “good” homes with loving parents, yet their destiny was to inflict destruction on others. On the other hand, there have been just as many cases of people who grew up on the streets without the guidance of a parental figure, but they chose to make a bad situation into a good one by growing up to do something worthwhile for mankind. For this reason, it is nearly impossible to determine what makes a human being choose the way he/she behaves. Mary Shelley (1797-1851) published a novel in 1818 to voice her opinions about determining personality and the consequences and repercussions of alienation. Shelley uses the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau to make her point. Rousseau proposed the idea that man is essentially "good" in the beginning of life, but civilization and education can corrupt and warp a human mind and soul. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (hereafter referred to as Frankenstein), Victor Frankenstein’s creature with human characteristics shows us that people are born with loving, caring, and moral feelings, but the creature demonstrates how the influence of society can change one’s outlook of others and life itself by his reactions to adversity at “birth”, and his actions after being alienated and rejected by humans several times.
The Road is a phenomenal example of how raw human nature shapes peoples’ decisions. It addresses the behaviors of people neither informed nor controlled by a social order. In the essence of The Road, people’s actions are highly dependent on the person’s basic needs. A lack of basic human needs often results in the more disturbing view of human nature. (Gilbert pg. 43) Betrayal, suicide, and cannibalism are all examples of behaviors that human nature can bring out of people.
Inwardly examining his own nature, man would prefer to see himself as a virtuously courageous being designed in the image of a divine supernatural force. Not to say that the true nature of man is a complete beast, he does posses, like many other creatures admirable traits. As author Matt Ridley examines the nature of man in his work The Origins of Virtue, both the selfish and altruistic sides of man are explored. Upon making an honest and accurate assessment of his character, it seems evident that man is not such a creature divinely set apart from the trappings of selfishness and immorality. Rather than put man at either extreme it seems more accurate to describe man as a creature whose tendency is to look out for himself first, as a means of survival.
With the son’s fear amongst the possibility of death being near McCarthy focuses deeply in the father’s frustration as well. “If only my heart were stone” are words McCarthy uses this as a way illustrate the emotional worries the characters had. ( McCarthy pg.11). Overall, the journey of isolation affected the boy just as the man both outward and innerly. The boys’ journey through the road made him weak and without a chance of any hope. McCarthy states, “Ever is a long time. But the boy knew what he knew. That ever is no time at all” (McCarthy pg. 28). The years of journey had got the best of both, where they no longer had much expectation for
At first the relationship between a father and his son can be perceived as a simple companionship. However, this bond can potentially evolve into more of a dynamic fitting relationship. In The Road The Man and his son have to depend on one another because they each hold a piece of each other. The Man holds his sons sense of adulthood while the son posses his father’s innocence. This reliance between the father and son create a relationship where they need each other in order to stay alive. “The boy was all that stood between him and death.” (McCarthy 29) It is evident that without a reason to live, in this case his son, The Man has no motivation to continue living his life. It essentially proves how the boy needs his father to love and protect him, while the father needs the boy to fuel ...