Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The regulation of internet
The regulation of internet
The regulation of internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The regulation of internet
The most critical concerns regarding the regulatory strategies revolve around the fundamental freedoms of expression and the right to personal autonomy which includes interference with a user’s right to the Internet. There is also the generic fear of the Internet being covered by political censorship. The creation of regulatory bodies and their mechanisms slowly encroached upon several Member States in the EU (France, Italy, UK, etc.) and sporadically across the world (Middle East, Australia, China, etc) and inevitably led blocking of different types of content (also known as ‘mission creep’). This invoked a fear amongst members of society especially those concerned with safeguarding their fundamental rights, and this led to the creation of several anti-censorship organisations. Having researched these organisations, there are a number of important issues that have been proposed.
Firstly, there is the argument of overblocking and underblocking caused by blocking and filtering mechanisms.
The reason the blocking strategy is so controversial in its application is because, on the Internet, there may be more than 50 websites that share the same IP address and it is technically impossible for an ISP to determine what content is held on domain names assigned to a specific IP address. Therefore, when the ISPs had to comply with the law, it resulted in a rather large number of blocking of innocent content on websites. BT’s Cleanfeed system apparently uses URL/IP blocking to prevent access to the list of sites identified on the IWF’s block list.
An analogy can be drawn in the incident of Steve Marshall (an English travel agent living in Spain) and his commercial websites aimed at Italian and French tourists. His domain names had been ...
... middle of paper ...
...ROPA - European Commission - Homepage. p. 11, n.d. Web. 10 Jan. 2011.
[2002] 1 Cr App R 6
Johnson, T. (2006), ‘Child Pornography in Canada and the United States: The Myth of Right Answers’, Dalhousie Law Journal, 29, p. 377
R v H [2005] EWCA Crim. 3037
S. 1466A(a)(2) PROTECT Act
Free Speech Coalition v Reno [1999] 198 F.3d 1083, 1102
Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition [2002] 535 US 234, at 250
See s. 1, Protection of Children Act 1978 and s. 62, 65, Coroners and Justice Act 2009
R v Oliver [2003] 1 Cr App R 28, at 468
Howitt, D. (1995) Paedophiles and Sexual Offences Against Children. New York: Wiley & Sons
"Incest." P. Toons Forum. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Jan. 2011. .
Pornography is considered by many to be an unwelcome and distasteful part of our society. However, I argue that it is necessary to voice the unpopular viewpoints, under the Constitution. This paper is a defense of pornography as a constitutional right of free expression, under the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. In illustrating this argument, I will first define pornography as a concept, and then address central arguments in favor of pornography remaining legal and relatively unregulated – such as the development of the pornography debate throughout modern US law, and how activist groups address the censorship of adult entertainment.
Pornography Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines In The United States. Law & Contemporary Problems, 76(1), 27-52.
Ashcroft vs. ACLU, 00-1293, deals with a challenge to the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), which Congress passed in 1998. The law, which is the subject of this essay, attempts to protect minors from exposure to Internet pornography by requiring that commercial adult websites containing "indecent" material that is "harmful to minors" use age-verification mechanisms such as credit cards or adult identification numbers.(Child)
27 Baird, Robert M. and Stuart E Rosenbaum. Pornography - Private Right or Public Menace Pg. 52
...ment: A Historical Timeline Of Children And Their Access To Pornography And Violence." Pace Law Review 33.1 (2013): 462-489. OmniFile Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson). Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
When deliberating over whether access to pornography should be prohibited, four areas of contention must be elaborated upon and evaluated critically to provide a sensible basis on which a judgement can be made. Firstly, it must be concluded whether pornography can be classed as a form of speech, and whether it enjoys the same protections as art and literature under the principle. Secondly, works such as those of Catherine MacKinnon can be drawn upon to offer a feminist perspective of the effects of pornography on the treatment of women within modern democratic society. Moreover, the principles of Devlin and Feinberg offer relevant acumen regarding the criminalisation of pornographic media. Overall, this essay will argue that whilst access to pornography should not be entirely prohibited; publications that depict ‘extreme’ situations should be subject to regulation and restriction.
During the 1950's there was a social movement against the pornography industry in Canada. Religious and Feminist groups were concerned about the harmful effects regarding the danger and degradation of women. The opposition to this movement was that pornography was a freedom of expression and sexual orientation. This brought about many political debates and controversies about what is ethically right and what is a personal freedom. This created many problems for the Canadian government on how to legislate pornography and up hold the Common Rights of Canada.
Abstract: This paper examines the use of Internet technologies (specifically SafeWeb.com) to counteract invasions of personal privacy and censorship. The paper begins by exploring the methods by which governments, corporations, and commercial agents invade personal privacy. It also discusses Internet censorship on the corporate and governmental levels. It then proceeds to discuss SafeWeb.com, a technology that allows Internet users to surf the Web privately and view censored content. The paper finishes by exploring some of the ethical issues raised by Internet privacy and censorship in specific relation to SafeWeb, concluding that the application of SafeWeb in circumventing the authority of governments and corporations is inherently unethical.
You just finished a day's work, have arrived home, unlocked the door, step inside, and just as you are about to yell, "anyone home," you hear hooting and hollering coming from the family room. As you enter the room you see your children and their friends glued to the computer screen, which is covered with explicit images not intended for the eyes of children. According to an article written by P.J.Huffstutter, "Yahoo, MSN Criticized for Offering Easy Access to Pornography," (C1) these two large Internet companies, have made it possible for everyone of all ages to access these adult communities. They require no proof of age, making it far too easy for under-age children to freely view the pornographic pictures and videos of their choice While adults may find leaving a site easy if they are uncomfortable, trying to restrict children from accessing these sites is a different issue. To watch your kids every moment is unrealistic and would not please anyone. According to Net Nanny, "Kids need to learn Internet safety practices and differentiate between right and wrong, because their parents won't always be there." There must be some sort of compromise. We, being responsible adults, need to take charge of what our children are doing when online, since little effort is required to gain entry to pornography sites. I used Microsoft's MSN search facility to look for "porn," and the only warning I received was that I had entered a search term that was likely to return adult content. While that may be more warning than in the past, it still isn't enough to keep children away. Then I was directed to a related link entitled NightSurf, and within two minutes I was presented with images of nudity...
Most of the Internet regulation is imposed by the Government in an effort to protect the best interest of the general public and is concerned with some form of censorship.
Canada is a free democratic society that protects and guarantees individual Charter rights and freedoms. However, these rights and freedoms are not absolute and can be limited when they infringe on the rights and freedoms of others. As a result, competing rights and values often emerges; therefore, the courts are in place to create a balance. To create this balance individual and societal factors are taken into consideration when the courts make their decisions. Additionally, the dignity and equality of children rights is violated through the existence of pornographic materials independent of its distribution. Therefore, the possession of child pornography limits freedom of expression as it innately harmful to children and the broader society.
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
In light of the controversy surrounding the possession of child pornography, it has been suggested that criminal prohibitions against possession should be removed. In other words, it would not be a crime to possess child pornography (Zekas, 2009). The logic behind this is that mere possession of child pornographic material is a completely different crime com¬pared to the same possession of child porno¬graphic material when there is an intention for further actions to commit crimes against children (Hessick, 2016). Current legal and social responses are not able to address the real issues concerning children as they are focused more on preventing harm and future risks. As such, it should no concern of criminal law for an individual to simply possess or access the material (Hessick, 2016).
In recent years, pornography has established itself as perhaps the most controversial topic arising out of the use of the Internet. The easy availability of this type of sexually explicit material has caused a panic among government officials, family groups, religious groups and law enforcement bodies and this panic has been perpetuated in the media.