Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison essay 1984 and brave new world
Comparison essay 1984 and brave new world
Consumerism aldous huxley
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison essay 1984 and brave new world
The novels 1984 and Brave New World serve the purpose of both satirizing their respective time periods as well as warning us of the dangers of consumer behavior. Both George Orwell and Aldous Huxley depict unique societies in which everything has gone wrong. Oceania in 1984 and The World State in Brave New World both depict distinct worlds in which the citizens are oppressed by their respective governments. People are given limited freedom and limited choices, while the government spews out lies and fabricated stories to control their behavior.
The World State in Brave New World strived to create “Community, Identity, [and] Stability” (Huxley 1). Immediately, one can see that Huxley is comparing The World State to a utopia, in which everything is perfect. Brave New World pokes fun at the society that Huxley lived in, with its concept of Henry Ford being the center of everything. Years are counted by the number of years After Ford. People greet each other with a “T” sign, which refers to the Model T. “Cleanliness is next to fordliness” (Huxley 110), says Lenina, as she looks at the people in the Malpais Savage Reservation. This seems jocular to anyone reading in modern times, but the citizens of The World State are just as serious about it as contemporary people are toward religion, culture, and nationalism.
Consumerism plays a huge role in Brave New World because it not only makes the citizens happier, but it also makes them easier to control. People are conditioned into liking new things and disliking older things. "I do love having new clothes” (Huxley 48). That quote shows how people are constantly valuing newer items over older ones. Even if the item is capable of being fixed, people wi...
... middle of paper ...
...e. In Brave New World, consumers can get whatever they want, but they are conditioned to want only what is available to them. “Our world is not the same as Othello's world. You can't make flivvers without steel-and you can't make tragedies without social instability. The world's stable now. People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can't get" (Huxley 220). In contrast to this, Oceania’s citizens can only get the cheap, low quality goods that are sold to them by the government.
However, despite the differences between them, both nations rely on and force their consumers to exclusively purchase their goods. The governments specifically control what the citizens have access to. Although consumerism is essential in cementing a good base for a strong economy, it also has the ability to hide the qualities that make us human.
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapments was voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the atmosphere and seductiveness of the “utopia” and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their inability to conform – often in protest to the forced conditions of happiness and well being. Their struggle is to hide this fact from the state’s relentless supervision of (supposedly) everything. This leads them to eventually come into conflict with some hand of the state which serves as the authors voice presenting the reader with the ‘absurdity’ of the principles on which the society is based. The similar fear of the state’s abuse of power and technology at the expense of human individuality present within these novels speaks to the relevance of these novels within their historical context and their usefulness for awakening people to the horrendous consequences of their ignorance.
1984 and Brave New World, written by George Orwell and Aldous Huxley, respectively, are both books that reflect the authors vision of how society would end up at the course it was going at the time of the writing of the book. Both books were written more than fifty years ago, but far enough apart that society was going in a totally different direction at the time. There are many ways to compare these two books and point out the similarities. On certain, deep levels they are very much the same, while at first glance, on the surface, they are very different. One point that in some parts is the same and some very different, is the governments in each of these books method’s of control.
Technology in a Totalitarian Society. In Brave New World written by Aldous Huxley and 1984 written by George Orwell the dystopian societies depend on technology to create a totalitarian society. Brave New World is a sequel to 1984, because Brave New World is an established dystopian society which uses technology in a much more pleasureable way, whereas in 1984 the technology is used in a much more aggressive manner. The technology used in both novels aids both governments in creating a totalitarian society, technology helps the government take control over all citizens, influence all of the peoples actions, and determine the people’s emotions.
Characteristics of our society reflect in the outcome of purchasing tendencies. How many of us can honestly say we make a valid effort to purchase goods made in our own country? In our face paced world where both parents are in the work force, raising children, social activities and everything else, who has time to make an effort? Most often, consumers only care about marking off the s...
Brave New World glorifies commercialism and the concept that happiness can be created by instant gratification and people placed
Alduos Huxley, in his science fiction novel Brave New World written in 1932, presents a horrifying view of a possible future in which comfort and happiness replace hard work and incentive as society's priorities. Mustapha Mond and John the Savage are the symbolic characters in the book with clashing views. Taking place in a London of the future, the people of Utopia mindlessly enjoy having no individuality. In Brave New World, Huxley's distortion of religion, human relationships and psychological training are very effective and contrast sharply with the literary realism found in the Savage Reservation. Huxley uses Brave New World to send out a message to the general public warning our society not to be so bent on the happiness and comfort that comes with scientific advancements.
Much can happen in a matter of minutes; a man can go from thinking he is happy to thinking his life is falling apart, or can change from hating someone to loving them. These experiences sound outlandish, but they happened to Guy Montag, the main character in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, and Winston Smith, the main character in George Orwell’s 1984. These two dystopian novels are about the characters discovering major problems in their societies, and then trying to fix them. Montag lives in a society where television controls people’s lives and books have become illegal. On the other hand Smith lives in Oceania, a territory led by a totalitarian regime. This regime is headed by Big Brother and is referred to as the Party. By examining Fahrenheit 451 and 1984, it is seen, not only through the dehumanized nature of society, but also through the theme of lies and manipulation that both Orwell and Bradbury wish to warn of a horrifying future society.
In the article excerpt, social critic Neil Postman describes two dystopian novels: George Orwell’s 1984, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Postman compares which novel is more relevant to today’s society, and leans more towards Brave New World. When both novels are compared side by side, it is evident that Huxley’s world is indeed more relative to modern day civilization.
1984 would not be the same if it lacked the harmonious presence of these contradictory elements, which developed a deeply corrupted society. The concepts like Newspeak, the Party’s slogans, and Ingsoc force readers to take an idea at face value, dig deeper to undercover the lie and then search for a way to prove that it is in fact the actual truth. 1984 pressures readers to use doublethink, actively believing two opposing ideas at the same time then repressing one, just to understand the way that Oceania runs. This effect helps create a parallel, if only for a moment, between the tortured comrades and the readers because we all must alter our thoughts to correlate with the Party’s. George Orwell’s use of paradoxes effectively brought the audience into the mind-boggling world of Oceania.
Aldous Huxley 's Brave New World, George Orwell 's 1984, and Anthony Burgess ' A Clockwork Orange all present a distinct, multi-faceted dystopia. Elements of the human psyche are exploited in order to preserve each civilization. Any threat of defiance is thoroughly investigated and the three governments engage strategies to handle them. Although the customs and laws are different in the respective societies, each demonstrates the extremes of behavior, the power of conditioning, and the innate need to belong.
Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, portrays a future society where people are no longer individuals but are controlled by the World State. The World State dominates the people by creating citizens that are content with who they are. Brave New World describes how the science of biology and psychology are manipulated so that the government can develop technologies to change the way humans think and act. The World State designs humans from conception to this society. Once the humans are within the society, the state ensures all people remain happy.
They both warn us of the dangers of a totalitarian society. Both books express a utopian ideal, examine characters that are forced into this state and are compelled to deal with this society and all the rules involved. The impracticality of the utopian ideal is explored in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley’s Brave New World. Both authors suggest that a lack of familial bonds, the repression of human individuality, and the repression of artistic and creative endeavors in order to attain a stable environment renders the achievement of a perfect state unrealistic. The lack of familial bonds, in both novels, contributes to the development of a dystopian society.
‘Brave New World’ by Aldous Huxley is a science-fiction book in which people live in a futuristic society and a place called the World State. In ‘Brave New World’, Aldous Huxley used the idea of consumerism to describe the behaviors and lives of the citizens of the World State. The practice of consumerism by the people of the World State fulfilled their satisfactory and happiness. However, it also blinded purity and truth among its people. Different classes and different genders of people practiced different acts of consumerism such as consuming soma, technology and bodies. They sought happiness from them and eventually these acts became a social norm. However, these practices of consumerism also had side effects. It blinded truth such as
George Orwell in the novel 1984 brought a sinister view of how life would be like under constant control. The astounding novel 1984 is a satire of Satanism. He deeply regards Oceania’s totalitarian impulse by keeping people in Oceania suppressed. Orwell’s world in Oceania emphasizes total brainwashing over the people of Oceania. They are taught at a young age to obey orders and pay loyalty to the government.
Consumerism is global; it occur every part of the world. It’s viewed as the social movement where people buy goods in excess just to find pleasure and enjoy life. It happens mostly in the western world though it still happens in the Japan as put forward in the novel. Yoshimoto has dealt with the theme of consumerism in many in many instances; it is more evident in the purchase of the juicer as well as the word processor. It has led Mike to believe that the Japanese have the taste in buying the new things. However, the authors also emphasize on the negative aspect of the consumerism through some of the impacts it has on Japanese tradition and culture. It’s through it that people have no value and the respect for the family. Due to their busy life, they find no time to spend with their families.