Conscription In Canada Essay

799 Words2 Pages

From 1914-1917, the beginning of the Great War, Canada’s armed forces began to face conflicts. World War One was nothing like the North American Wars in the past, and that brought the question of preparation into play. As Canada prepared for a different style conflict, trench warfare took its role, and caused difficulties for trained soldiers. The Second battle of Ypres turned the First World War into a Canadian one, as their contributions were greatly noted in their casualties lost. This proved costly to volunteers, and at home, in the second half of 1915, citizens were becoming hesitant to volunteer due to the horrors of war. In April 1916, Borden and other civilian recruitment centers encourage the prime minister that conscription will be …show more content…

These decisions caused controversy in Canada, as some still viewed the war as a European effort. The effects of conscription created a wider range of social classes based on class and ethnicity. Canadian forces following the war reorganized and rethought that military due to the actions of the First World War. Preparation was needed in peacetime, as problems ensued at the beginning of the war. By 1920, Canada and its citizens were exhausted by the war efforts, and conscription was in no desire. This led to lack of interest in the militia, as well as cutting of funds. The troubles that Canada faced were liberal values after a tremendous war, meaning that they thought that they could live peacefully and democratically. World War One split Canada from Britain, showing Canada was a strong, independent nation, even in tough times. As we faced that challenges of the war on our own means, Canadians felt patriotic to their country following the war, even though troubles still …show more content…

From excerpts from Canadian Newspapers, the book supplied accurate references, that included many primary sources. “Sources such as the Canadian Military Gazette, which Wood fully exploits for the first time, reveal that part-time officers took Canadian defense much more seriously than we have come to believe.” The method that Militia Myths took was factual conceptions on the Militia from both supporters and neglectors. With speeches and comments from military and political leaders, as well as the common soldier, we notice that there were many differences between the ideal conception of the Canadian militia. Andrew L. Brown’s Cutting its Coat according to the cloth: The Canadian Militia and Staff training before the Great War is a similar writing to that of Militia Myths, but with focus especially on the Militia Staff Course and how it contributed to the militia. While arguing that Canada needed a professional staff to train this militia, Brown strongly suggests the importance of training the militia, and the problems of a citizen’s army. With content, comparable to that of Militia Myths, we can see the similarities of the writings. Cutting its coat is focused on the basic training of the Militia Staff Course, from the period of 1909-1922. With references from the author and other outside sources, Brown focuses on the success of the MSC in contribution to

Open Document