Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles
Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles
Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles
The Congress of Vienna Versus The Paris Peace Conference The Congress of Vienna of 1815 and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 are similar in countless ways, but are also remarkably different. One example of a difference between them is that in the Congress of Vienna, only Europe was involved, but in the Paris Peace Conference, because it was after a total war, meaning that it affected the whole world, even the civilians, people all around the world (representatives from 32 countries) came to the conference. An example of why the two are alike is, they both wanted to create buffer zones for a two different European countries. That is just a sample of the complex relationship between the Congress of Vienna of 1815 and …show more content…
This clearly shows how different the motives of the Congress of Vienna of 1815 and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 are. Secondly, there are various differences and similarities between the Congress of Vienna and the Paris Peace Conference in terms of their proceedings. For example they both dealt with changes in territory. The main contributors to the Congress of Vienna was Prince Klemens Von Metternich who was the foreign minister of Austria during 1815 and for The Paris Peace Conference, Woodrow Wilson who was the president of the United States in 1919, Georges Clemenceau of france, David Lloyd George of Great Britain, and Vittorio Orlando of Italy were the most important representatives. Both the Congress of Vienna and the Paris Peace Conference had many wants. Including, the Congress of Vienna wanted to stop all future revolutions in Europe and to make France weaker. The Paris Peace Conference wanted all countries to
Austria was one of the strongest empires in Europe in early 19th century and most of the small European states had rulers from Hapsburg dynasty so Austria had a lot of influence. Letting Nationalistic feelings to rise anywhere in Europe meant that soon those feelings would rise up in Austria
(In the sources cited, I could pick a few sentences from each and claim them as my own to make a splendid presentation. But they are not my own, and the question is pretty simple as is the answer. I could also research this for hours upon hours, as I have been known to do, and surely make it my own. This time, I will follow the advice one of my instructors said to his class here at CCC: “Keep it simple, stupid”).
The two were alike in many aspects as described above, but had some dissimilarity as well which are summed up as:
This puts the event into perspective. While it is only a small event, it is related to the whole world that shows its importance.
Though both of these things talk about the same basic idea, there are many differences s...
different thing. THey compare in only one way. This is the fact that they both
middle of paper ... ... He surrendered, ending the war and later leading to the Treaty of Paris. Z- John Peter Zenger-
and Serbia in 1914. It was transformed into a general European struggle by declaration of
Ushistory.org (2013). The Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations [ushistory.org]. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.ushistory.org/us/45d.asp [Accessed: 17 Nov 2013].
In 1815, the Congress of Vienna set forth a political plan for Europe which would create stability among the European nations after Napoleon suffered defeat (Ross 74). ...
At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 the “Big Four” meet to settle terms of peace. Britain and France wanted to punish Germany, Italy wanted money or land, and the United States wanted to heal wounds through Wilson’s League of Nations. There was a discussion about whether the United Sates wanted to accept the Treaty Versailles or not. President Wilson wanted the League of Nations to “end all wars”. It was not the influence of the opposing forces of the U.S., conservative or liberal, that led to the absolute defeat of the Treaty of Versailles, but rather the political unawareness, incapability, and stubbornness of President Woodrow Wilson.
First, Japan’s role in global politics after World War I had been questioned by both sides. Team 1 began the discussion by asking how Japan expected the West to be open diplomatically when it was unwilling and hesitant. In response, Team 2 asserted that Japan was not respected in the political stage from the beginning. This argument, while already strategically successful, could have been expanded to support Team 2’s position further. A blatant example of this lack of recognition can be seen in the Paris Peace Conference of 1919; primarily, while the conference appeared to be controlled by the five major powers resulting from World War I (the U.S., Britain, France, Italy, and Japan), Japan only played a minor role (Albrecht-Carrie 363). Rather, the “Big Four,” leaders of the remaining four countries, met informally numerous times and were responsible for all of the major decisions throughout the conference (Lentin 25).
The bombs had raised hell on earth for those few minutes and produced a tremendous amount of casualties. The way people had died was shocking...
It has been almost a century since the first Paris Peace Conference was hold, but even until now, it is a popular yet also controversial event in the history of the world. The Paris Peace Conference took place in 1919 involving more than 1,000 representatives from over 30 nations. The results of the Conference are five treaties regarding terms that, according to the Conference, shall prevent any upcoming conflicts among nations. Although World War II started only after 15 years, nonetheless, the treaties did function as a buffer between countries. Although many resolutions were discussed, the negotiation of the Conference revolves around four main topics, reparation from the previous war losses or limitations on the main Central Power, Germany, self-recognition, President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points, and the annexation of land.
Origins for the cooperation amongst powers necessary to tackle international disputes can be traced back to the 19th century, however the formation of the League of Nations was eagerly prompted by the First World War. After the horrors in which the world observed, leaders merged together and rejoiced in the potential for a new international system. The League of Nations foremost objective was to secure peace through collective efforts of ‘peace-loving’ powers (Steans, Pettiford, & Diez, 2005, p. 31). President Woodrow Wilson was a lead proponent in the creation of such a body, suggesting it- within his message on the Conditions of Peace- as a means of ‘affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike’ (Wilson, 1918). The following year a detailed scheme was presented at the Versailles Peace Conference and the league was swiftly established with the addition of a permanent secretariat in Geneva. (Catterall, 1999, p. 50). The League was very much considered the ‘most daring and innovative proposal’ (Wilkinson, 2007, p. 85)