There are many similarities between the conflicts in “Lather and Nothing Else” by Hernando Téllez and “The Sniper” by Liam O’Flaherty. In “Lather”, a barber in the South America revolution, secretly working as an informer for the revolutionaries is presented with the opportunity to kill his worst enemy, Captain Torres one of the leaders of the revolution. Although he is only an informer and a barber, he has Captain Torres’ life in his hands and ponders whether to kill or not kill him but in the ends lets him go unharmed. In “The Sniper”, a Republican sniper is presented with the task to kill a Free Staters sniper in a civil war. When he gets shot, he has to escape by killing the enemy sniper and manages it, but when he looks at the enemy sniper …show more content…
close up , he notices that the Free Staters sniper was actually his brother. There are many similarities conflict-wise in both stories, the first man versus man as the Republican Sniper has the kill the Free Staters sniper. The second similar conflict is man versus society as both of the short stories have two sides in one war or revolution. The third similar conflict is man versus self as both the characters in both stories have debates within themselves whether to do or not to do something. These are the conflict similarities between “Lather” and “The Sniper”. In “The Sniper” and “Lather”, there are many similarities in the conflict, man versus man.
Both stories have a protagonist and an antagonist, both who want to murder each other as shown in “Lather” when the barber is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill Captain Torres, his worst enemy, although he ends up not having the guts to do so. It is shown in “The Sniper” when the Republican sniper kills the Free Staters sniper without hesitation in order to help the Republicans win the civil war as he has also done with the Free Staters informer. Also, both the Antagonist of “Lather” and the protagonist of “The Sniper” use deception to gain an advantage over their enemy. In “Lather”, Captain Torres, one of the leaders of the revolution walks into the barber shop to see whether the barber would kill him or not by placing his own life in the barber's hands with the barber’s razor right next to his neck. In “The Sniper”, when the Republican sniper gets shot and gets into a tough situation, he tests the enemy sniper by placing his cap over his sniper and raising it so that the enemy sniper could see it so that the Republican Sniper could see if the enemy sniper would notice if it was a …show more content…
decoy. Both the Antagonist of “Lather” and the protagonist of “The Sniper” use deception to gain an advantage over their enemy. Captain Torres places himself in an immense danger of being killed by the barber’s razor while also making the barber angry. He does this by talking about how he would kill the rebels and making it more brutal and bloodier than the last time when he says, “it may be even better” (p. 15), when the barber asks if it would be as horrifying as last time and then telling the barber “They told me you would kill me…….(p.17) while the barber’s razor is right beside his neck, but when Captain Torres is about to exit the barber shop, he tells the barber that he knew that the barber a rebel all along when the barber had thought that none of the captains of the revolution knew that he was a rebel. In “The Sniper”, the Free Staters sniper stays very still making other people in the area think that no one is where he is unlike the Republican sniper who risks taking a smoke and gets all the people in the area’s attention. Another one of the other similarities between the two stories is man versus society. Man versus society plays a big part in both “The Sniper” and “Lather”. One of theses similarities between both stories is that both stories have two sides in some type of conflict. In “The Sniper”, there are two sides of the Irish civil war which are the Republicans and The Free Staters fighting over the Anglo-American Treaty. In “Lather”, the two sides are the revolutionaries and the rebels in the South America Revolution fighting over the independence of the people in South America. Another similarity in the conflict man versus society in both short stories is how the antagonists of both “Lather” and “The Sniper” are pressured by their side of the society to kill another member on the opposing side. In “The Sniper”, you could easily tell that the sniper has been pressured by his side of the society to kill multiple times as the sniper's are deep and thoughtful like the ones used to looking at death. In “Lather”, the barber knows that he must kill Captain Torres as he states, “so it was going to be very difficult to explain how it was that I had him in my hands and let him go in peace, alive, clean-shaven” (P. 16). This implies that the barber knows that he has to kill or hurt Captain Torres or else he would be suspected of not being a spy for the Captains of the Revolution. The next of the three types of conflict is man versus self. In Both the short stories “Lather” and “The Sniper”, there are also many similarities through man versus self. Although both Protagonists and Antagonists of both stories have a lot of differences they are also similar because they are both pressured into doing something that they would rather not do. In the short story “The Sniper”, you could easily tell that the Republican sniper was pressured to participate in the war because as the book states, “his face was the face of a student's thin and ascetic, but his eyes had a cold gleam of fantic. They were deep and thoughtful, the eyes of a man who is used to looking a death” (p. 8) which implies that at his age, he should be going to school, not participating in a civil war as one side of him knows it's his duty to participate in the Civil war while the other side knows that he should continue his education at his age. In “Lather” although the barber is only an informer in the civil war, he is still pressured to kill Captain Torres as he states, “so it was going to be very difficult for me to explain how it was that I had him in my hands and them let him go in peace, alive, clean-shaven (p. 16) which implies that although the barber does not have the courage to commit murder, the rebels still pressure him into killing Captain Torres as the quote implies that the barber still has a responsibility with Captain Torres life in his hands even though he is an informer. Another similarity between the two stories man versus self-wise is that although the barber is insecure and the Republican sniper is a fanatic, they both consider doing something that they don’t have to do that has a high-risk.
In “The Sniper”, the Republican sniper considers taking a smoke although if the spark is seen, his location would be given out which would put him in more danger. In “Lather”, the barber considers killing Captain Torres but if he were to, the barber states” But the blood would be flowing along the floor, warm, indelible, not to be stanched, until it reached the street like a scarlet river” (p. 16) which implies that if he were to kill Captain Torres, the blood would be noticed by the Revolutionaries which would result in the barber being hunted down and murdered if he were
found. The last one of the man versus self conflict similarities in both stories is how both Protagonists of the two stories fight to keep their composure or else their location or true identity would be given out as in “The Sniper”, when the Republican sniper gets shot down by the Free Staters sniper, he fights the urge to scream in agony or else his location would be given out to everyone else in the area after he puts iodine on his wound. In “Lather”, the barber tries not to shake as Captain Torres talks about how he would kill the captured rebels because if Captain Torres notices the shaking, he would suspect that the barber is a rebel. These examples show how similar the two stories are conflict wise. In conclusion, There are many similarities conflict-wise between “The Sniper and “Lather and Nothing Else”. One of the three conflicts being man versus man both stories has an antagonist and protagonist. Another one of the three conflicts being man versus society. Although both conflicts are different, they are also similar since they both have two sides both fighting to achieve something. The last of the three conflicts is man versus self. Man versus self is probably the biggest of the three conflicts since it is focused directly on the Protagonist as they take many risks especially in “Lather and Nothing Else. In conclusion, “The Sniper” and “Lather and Nothing Else” are so similar conflict-wise, it is almost like the two stories are written by the same author.
Both stories, Response to Executive Order 9066 and "Mericans", establish a common American Identity theme. The main idea of these two stories is how people may or may not relate to their cultures. Both are narrated by teenage girls, and both establish a common theme that your appearance does not define you.
In “The Sniper” the conflict is man vs man, which means main character is tasked with killing his enemy, but it proves to be quite a challenge. Even though there were many challenges the sniper followed through with his job and persevered even after he was shot in the arm. Wanting to kill his enemy, stay alive, and be one step closer to ending the war was his main goals. Being brave, he took off his hat, placed it on his gun, and raised it above the edge of the roof. Instantly the enemy shot at it and the sniper, pretending to be dead, waited until the enemy got up for him to shoot him. He did some quick thinking and, with determination, handled the conflict quite well.
The basic premise of the two plots is the same. Both stories deal with the capture of a young person who is to be groomed to live in a private, controlled environment to make them happy, but where they are never able to leave.
Evil is omnipresent, but it cannot be clearly perceived without an unbiased understanding of its intent and motivation. In “The Tattooed Soldier”, this sense of evil is depicted in the two main characters, Antonio Bernal and Guillermo Longoria. The book is set in the late 20th century era of Los Angeles, where the city is in a state of riot and utter chaos. The story focuses on Antonio, a political refugee from a dictated Guatemala, and Longoria, a former member of the Guatemalan death squad. They came to Los Angeles from the same country, but their beliefs and actions differ severely. When their paths cross, Antonio is struck with fear, because he recognizes Longoria as the tattooed soldier who killed his family. The encounter triggers a flashback
In the story, “The Sniper”, The sniper showed that he was an intelligent soldier. In the beginning, after Being shot by the enemy sniper the sniper took care of his wound and was able to compose himself and think of a plan. Thinking he had won the battle after the snipers successful decoy the enemy sniper dropped his guard and the second he did the sniper
In conclusion both short stories were great at allowing us the reader to see the way that women were repressed in their society in the 1900s. We don't hate the men; we just wish women did not have to be so subservient. Freedom is achieved in very unconventional ways in both of these stories, but the kind of freedom these narrators achieve is not available to most women of this time era.
In Liam O'Flaherty´s The Sniper, all of these are brought to an acute reality in a single war-torn city. Strong cerebral convictions and opposing philosophies, due to which people want to destroy.
They heard! I was certain of it.” The characters aren’t developed very much in both of the stories, however, their characteristics are different. The main characters in both of the short story are two people, but the protagonist is developed innocent and the antagonist is unrighteous in “Click Clack and Rattle Bag”, “I reached over and tousled his hair.” “I would have pulled away, then, if I could, but small, firm fingers pulled me forward, unrelentingly, into the dark.” show that the young man wants to take care of the kid, but the kid uses his good looks and tone and finally kills the man. And on the contrast, the
The perspective of the two stories allow the reader to perceive the sense of proximity the protagonist has with their victim. The Sniper is told in an objective point of view, the reader is presented only with short and factual information, keeping a distance between the reader and the story. Just Lather, That's All on the other hand, is told from a first person point of view, the reader intimately experiences the thoughts and feelings of the barber. The different points of view are used to give the reader an understanding of the distance the protagonists have with their victims. The third person point of view in The Sniper presents factual information, similar to how the sniper only knows what he sees of his targets. There is no compassion for the sniper when he is shot because it is stated in a neutral stand, just as he feels no compassion for his victims because he has not personally known them nor does he know their thoughts and feelings. The first person point of view in Just Lather, That's All gives a sense on empathy for the barber, as his thoughts and reasoning is presented, there is an understanding to why he d...
As we saw earlier, both authors of both stories were born in different places and did many things. “The Sniper” sets in Dublin, Ireland, during a time of a bitter civil war. It was a war between the Republicans, which wanted Ireland to become ...
The basic plot of the story is based during an evening within the Irish civil wars. It tells of a republican sniper sitting on a rooftop and neutralising enemy units as the cross a bridge. When a free-states sniper shows himself on an opposite roof they wage a fierce and innovative war to see who would end up the better. Eventually the republican sniper gains the upper hand and after taking a bullet in the arm destroys the worthy opponent. After a curious inspection to the identity of the enemy sniper he finds himself looking into the eyes of his dead brother.
Both stories show the characters inequality with their lives as women bound to a society that discriminates women. The two stories were composed in different time frames of the women’s rights movement; it reveals to the readers, that society was not quite there in the fair treatment towards the mothers, daughters, and wives of United States in either era. Inequality is the antagonist that both authors created for the characters. Those experiences might have helped that change in mankind to carve a path for true equality among men and women.
In both stories the sniper and The Scarlet Ibis the protagonists had a complicated relationship with their brothers. In the first story the relationship between the brothers is unknown. The Republican sided brother didn't know his brother was on the Freeskater side and killed him. In the next story, The Scarlet Ibis, Doodle just wanted to please his brother. Doodle was weaker and felt like he had to live up to his brothers standards. As a result of their actions the protagonist caused their brothers
The setting to “The Sniper” plays a vital role in understanding the meaning O’Flaherty was trying to convey. The main character is sitting on a rooftop near O’Connell Bridge in Dublin Ireland. During the Irish Civil War, the river that flowed beneath the bridge, was the dividing line in the Battle of Dublin. From the beginning, when civilians watched the opening attacks from atop the bridge, to the end, when it shook from the final bombing that forced the Republicans to surrender, the bridge was a key factor to the end result of the war. (Black,
Both stories show feminism of the woman trying to become free of the male dominance. Unfortunately, the woman are not successful at becoming free. In the end, the two women’s lives are drastically