Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exploring the character of the giver
Dystopia in the giver
Exploring the character of the giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exploring the character of the giver
The protagonist in the book “the giver” is Jonas because he changes his mind about the government intentions. In the beginning of the story Jonas thought nothing of the government but towards the ending he decides to protest them. According to “the giver” “ ‘Memories need to be shared’... Jonas watched him and listened” (Lowry 154). This means that Jonas listened to the giver and helped him come up with a plot to make a change. Jonas as the receiver is much different than Jonas just as a 12 because he’s changed his thoughts on the government and the meaning of life. A personality trait of Jonas is that he is caring, and being caring affect’s the plot because it causes him to take Gabriel with him . The author chose this element for Jonas because it affects the ending it helps create the conflict. It affects the ending because greater challenges faced because Jonas was caring enough to take Gabriel with him. it creates conflict by him wanting to share the memories with others. “He killed it! My father killed it! Jonah …show more content…
In the story the giver all the people in the community does not have the ability to know what color is, music and love. According to “the Giver” ‘Our people made a choice to go back to sameness...We relinquished sunshine and did away with differences’ ” (Lowry 95). This means that the government took away the differences and made everybody the same. And in doing this they took away uniqueness that made everybody special. This is the dystopian element dehumanization because they are dehumanizing their way of life. This dystopian element shapes the plot because It creates the central conflict. Some repercussions of the society Dehumanizing its citizens are that the citizens will get angry because the government with keeping certain characteristics away from them to make them
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
The Giver is about a boy named Jonas who was chosen to be the community’s next Receiver of Memory. He lived in a community where everything was chosen for the citizens, and everything was perfect. During Jonas' training, he realized that the community was missing something and that there was more in the world. Jonas wanted everybody to know that. The Giver book was then made into a movie.
Jonas decides to leave and change the lives of his people so that they can experience the truth. “The Giver rubbed Jonas’s hunched shoulders… We’ll make a plan” (155). Their plan involves leaving sameness and heading to Elsewhere, where Jonas knows the memories can be released to the people. He has a connection with Gabe, a special child who has experienced the memories, unlike the rest of the community. Jonas has a strong love for Gabe, and he longs to give him a better life. “We’re almost there, Gabriel” (178). Even with a sprained ankle, Jonas keeps pushing forward because he wants everyone to experience what The Giver has given him. He wants them to have a life where the truth is exposed. His determination allows him to make a change for a greater future in his community. This proves that Jonas has the strength to change his community for the
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
The Giver: Analysis of Jonas On the surface, Jonas is like any other eleven-year-old boy living in his community. He seems more intelligent and perceptive than many of his peers, and he thinks more seriously than they do about life, worrying about his own future as well as his friend Asher’s. He enjoys learning and experiencing new things: he chooses to volunteer at a variety of different centers rather than focusing on one, because he enjoys the freedom of choice that volunteer hours provide. He also enjoys learning about and connecting with other people, and he craves more warmth and human contact than his society permits or encourages. The things that really set him apart from his peers—his unusual eyes, his ability to see things change in a way that he cannot explain—trouble him, but he does not let them bother him too much, since the community’s emphasis on politeness makes it easy for Jonas to conceal or ignore these little differences.
Jonas is the protagonist in The Giver. He changes from being a typical twelve-year-old boy to being a boy with the knowledge and wisdom of generations past. He has emotions that he has no idea how to handle. At first he wants to share his changes with his family by transmitting memories to them, but he soon realizes this will not work. After he feels pain and love, Jonas decides that the whole community needs to understand these memories. Therefore Jonas leaves the community and his memories behind for them to deal with. He hopes to change the society so that they may feel love and happiness, and also see color. Jonas knows that memories are hard to deal with but without memories there is no pain and with no pain, there is no true happiness.
In The Giver, by Lois Lowry, the reader is left with an uncertain ending about what happens to the main character of the story, Jonas, and his little friend, Gabriel. The plot of a story usually ends with a resolution, where the conflict of the story is resolved; however, this is clearly not the case with The Giver. It is not possible to be completely certain on the ending of this book by reading this story alone; however, it is possible to gather the evidence and assume what likely occurred in the ending of The Giver. One cannot be sure on what happened at the ending of The Giver; however, I believe that Jonas and Gabriel did not survive. I also believe that there could have been a more effective ending to the story; I highly disagree with Lois Lowry’s choice of leaving it up to the reader to decide what happens in the ending of the story, for it leaves too many unanswered questions. Overall, I did not enjoy the ending of The Giver due to its ambiguity.
“Even I (Jonas’ father) voted for release when we had the meeting.” (164). Jonas wanted the best for Gabriel, so he brought Gabe with him thinking that he will end up saving him. Jonas made his decision under pressure, a reckless decision that could kill both of them, he did think of food but he underestimated the amount needed, he wanted to save Gabe. “And he had taken Gabe, too.” (166). Jonas felt as if he would save Gabe from a pointless life, which had no real meaning in making choices or decisions. The main reason was that he didn’t want to leave Gabe to die, but to save him from it and giving Gabe a better one when they somehow get to elsewhere. Overall, Jonas took the responsibility to save Gabe but in that he also to gave him a better life, than the corrupted world they both used to live
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
Don Van Vliet, an American artist, once said: “I’d never just want to do what everybody else did. I’d be contributing to the sameness of everything.” In the book, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, people did not have a choice to do what everyone else did or not. Everyone was contributing to the sameness of the community Jonas, the protagonist, lives in. In this community, everyone was the same. They all had the same rituals and activities and were not permitted to make choices for themselves. Everyone receives an assignment, like a career, at the Ceremony of Twelve. But Jonas received a special assignment, he had been given the honor to be the next Receiver of Memory, who receives and stores all of the memories of the world’s past. Jonas received
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
Jonas’ destiny at the end of the novel is not clear. Lowry intentionally writes an ambiguous ending so that the readers can decide for themselves. She mentions the reason for choosing an ambiguous ending of the novel:
Plot of The Giver The main character, Jonas, is part of a society with enforced sameness. This is achieved by removing every memory of a time before the sameness begun. Jonas is assigned as the new receiver of memory when he becomes a twelve, and the previous receiver, now the Giver, transmits the memories to Jonas. As his training goes on Jonas wants to make a difference, he wants everyone to see color and feel love like he does, which was the Giver’s intention.
The drama-science fiction film is directed by the 64-year-old Australian Phillip Noyce, who has directed 54 films and series so far, including the Salt (2010) and the Catch a Fire (2006). Two decades ago Jeff Bridges was the first, who wanted to get the filming rights in the screen adaptation of Lois Lowry's book. He desired to direct the film and gave the Giver’s role for his father, but the process was too long and his father died in 1998. He ended up playing one of the most significant role in the movie: he grabbed the Giver’s role. (The Sydey Morning Herald)
The Giver by: Lois Lowry Jonas lives in a dystopian world where the government centuries before have taken away memories taking away destruction, danger, and pain, but also color, music, and art. Jonas starts seeing changings for only an instant and stirring( emotional dreams that the government couldn’t destroy so the people have to take pills). Jonas is then chosen to be the receiver, a job where Jonas must receive the memories of the world from the giver( the one who holds the memories). He has to receive the memories of joy such as the sun on a summer day and sledding down a hill in the winter, however Jonas must also take in the pain such as breaking a leg, and destruction of the years like war.