Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural conflict between tradition and modernity
Indian culture details
Essay on indian civilization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural conflict between tradition and modernity
Conflict Between the Traditional and Modern Values of an Indian Society in Smoke and The First Party
'Smoke' and 'The First Party' display two points of view on the
continuing conflict between traditional and modern values. In Indian
culture, tradition holds the highest status of importance possible,
second only to, or perhaps next to, religion. Indian traditions and
culture is one of the oldest in the world, arising from 5000 BC.
Perhaps this is why modern Indians find it so hard to comply with
traditional rules and regulations a they were set in and for the
people and civilizations of an ancient time.
But indeed there still exist beings in the forms of grandparents and
great - grand parents who try and uphold their sanskars and paramparas
(traditions and cultures) and defend them against those who desire
change. Perhaps this is why India, though one of the fastest growing
economies in the world, is finding it hard to change when it comes to
matters of customs and beliefs.
The two stories 'Smoke' and 'The First Party' have an ongoing
conflict, but I feel they both represent different sides of the same
story. They both present to the readers, women who are trying to cross
the boundaries into the modern and liberal world of the west. Their
reactions and struggles are varied, with one longing to escape while
the other scared and aggressive at the change. This difference can
also be seen as the struggle for change versus the defiance against
change.
I think the difference in attitudes towards tradition is most
evidently shown in the attitudes of the central characters in the two
stories. Shubha in 'Smoke' is introduced with an ...
... middle of paper ...
...tive and dramatic words. Words like 'vulgar',
'disgusting', and 'shameful' are in a sense rather disturbing. Her
descriptions are vibrant with colour - 'claws dipped in blood',
'sarclet'- as opposed to the dry rather drab colouring in 'Smoke'.
Perhaps this kind of language is used to show the aggressive views and
opinions of a generation obsessed with tradition.
In 'Smoke' Shubha's descriptions are deep yet tiring. Words like 'the
oppressive, tormenting afternoon' and 'hollow neutral vacuum' are
quite dreary and listless. Also in this story I did not find many
words that sparked action. All the action and movement in this story
is forced and habitual an so it looses its effect. There is not much
colour. When flowers are talked about in the beginning, they are 'dry'
and 'dead'. Lifeless perhaps like her own existence.
Throughout the film of Smoke Signals, the story centers on two characters, Thomas and Victor. Thomas, through his storytelling shows Victor that there's more to life than cynicism and pure anger, while Victor let's Thomas know what it means to be a real Indian. We can see this in the scene where Victor tells Thomas that Indians are not supposed to smile to white people and that Indians always should look mean in order to gain the respect of white folks. However, we can see that after they return to the bus their seats have been taken by two white men and neither did Victor’s mean face and faded smile help him gain their seats back. This scene shows us that those stereotypes about how what an Indian is supposed to act are not in fact true because
In Chris Eyre’s Smoke Signals a recurring topic of discussion is frybread. Made of simple ingredients such as flour, water, and baking powder, frybread has become a delicacy of the people on the Couer D’Alene Indian Reservation. Its popularity is due to the poverty of the Couer D’Alene Indians and how cheap it is to make. Frybread is also a very stereotypical Native American food that plays a part in Thomas’s turning into a “real Indian.” Frybread is symbolic of Native American culture as a result of colonialism because it shows the decline in their standard of living.
Indian society was patriarchal, centered on villages and extended families dominated by males (Connections, Pg. 4). The villages, in which most people lived, were admini...
The narrator’s family considers socializing as a principal habit in Indian society. They have only one neighbor behind the fence, they are surrounded by a government office and a high
The first perception discussed in the essay compares the way the Indians run their form of government to that of the English. He notes how the Indian are able to run a government without police, prisons, or punishment, and instead it is run on a sort of basis of respect with “great order and decency” (Norton, 477). When someone speaks in the Indian counsel everyone listens and remains silent, and once the speaker is finished the rest remain silent to allow time for th...
Has culture ever influenced you? Despite cultures huge place in the world, I think culture does not influence the world. I believe that culture does not influence the world because, no one is going to change their thoughts on a person just because of their culture. For example if someone loved another person then the find out the other person is from an Indian culture would that person hate the other just because there Indian?
It is not surprising that thinkers as diverse as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Mahatma Gandhi have found inspiration in The Bhagavad Gita, the great HINDU religious poem. At first glance, this statement must seem odd to you: after all, The Bhagavad Gita describes a momentary surcease in a vast battle in which brothers fight brothers in bloody, historical technicolor. The principal character, Arjuna, sits in a chariot in the midst of the mass of soldiers who wait -- surprisingly patiently -- as Arjuna looks into his conscience and questions his divine charioteer, Krishna. Krishna's temporary job as charioteer is by no means accidental: this moment before the heat and horror of battle was chosen as precisely the right time to reflect on the nature of duty and devotion. The Bhagavad Gita, then, becomes a record of Arjuna's questions and Krishna's provocative responses.
Heaphy, Linda. "Life in India: the Practice of Sati or Widow Burning." Life for the modern nomad. Kashgar, 2012. Web. 21 Mar. 2014. .
During the early 1900s, the British people had been living among the Indian culture for an extended period of time. Several discrepancies had been established between these two groups due to stereotypes, prejudices, and ignorance. E.M. Forster implied his deepest aspirations for accord to ameliorate this quandary in his erudite novel, A Passage to India, written in 1912. Through specific usage of certain landscape features, a sound, and animals, the omniscient narrator explores the idea of an all-encompassing unity and its beneficial and corrosive possibilities.
of Maladies Kiran Desai (Desai) and Jhumpa Lahiri (Lahiri) are of Indian descent. However, they
The novel shows how secularism is one of the most abused words in Indian politics. It has become pseudo-secularism. Pseudo means false. It results into appeasement of some particular opinion or group for immediate social and political gains. It results into the grievances of Hindus towards their government in India and enhancement of their animosity towards their fellow beings. Having been brainwashed by the rhetoric of the “heroic heritage” of the past and the “pathetic situation” of the present, the “Hindu” youth are made to feel intensely the need for shunning “impotence” and “weakness”. The novel clearly depicts that sufferings of Hindus and fears of Muslims in the novel is the result of politics being played out by politicians to meet their own selfish
Siva, Manu. Difference in Cultural Values. India Today (20) 3. 45-48 Retrieved April 03, 2006
The novel deals with a tale of the turbulent 1970’s in India whilst Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a state of inner emergency and suspended India’s Constitution. Mistry does no longer hide his anger about the malevolence of the authorities and the corruption of its marketers, powerful and petty alike. But of all the great things about this novel, perhaps the best is the way Mistry continues his storytelling from being submerged by way of the political subject. A Fine Balance tells the story of four innocent folks snared in the grinding gears of history. And the post-colonial history of India, like Mistry’s story, is right now brutally easy and delicately complex, plausible and brilliant, perverse and humane. The tale is opened up through the lives of four major characters: Ishvar Darji, his nephew Omprakash, their corporation Dina Dalai, and her paying guest Maneck Kohlah. The emergency intrudes into the lives of these kinds of characters leading to their
Having focused on E.M Forster’s ‘A Passage to India’ and Paul Scott’s ‘The Jewel in the Crown’ it is evident that both novels share the central theme of contrasting views of Indian culture to reflect society from the time periods of which their novels are set. The form of ‘A Passage to India’ is a retrospective diary account dictated by an omniscient third person narrator who has multiple viewpoints which endeavours into the psychological mind set of the characters.
In the latter book India: A Wounded Civilization Naipaul adopts a pragmatic approach to prove his point on the postcolonial society. What he seeks and hears around in India, he relates to men who reflect or transmit culture, to concepts, and assumptions such as “Dharma’’ and “Karma” at the back of the Hindu attitude. He finds Gandhi and R.K. Narayan as more or less representing the old morality, and Vijay Tendulkar and U.R. Ananthamurthy as reflecting the inadequacy “new morality,’’ whereby individuals realizing the inadequacy of post myths strike out on their own. Naipaul says, in the “Foreword’’ India is for me a difficult country. It isn’t my home and cannot be my home, and yet I cannot reject it or be indifferent to it . Thus the spiritual fix in which he finds himself while he is face to face with India is not of divided Loyalties but of divided energies. This is what Naipaul says of Gandhi in An Area of