Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What can i say about louis riel in my own words
Essay on louis riel
Essay on louis riel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What can i say about louis riel in my own words
Confilcting Ideas of the Past in Canada He has been called a prophet, a traitor, a martyr, a visionary and a madman, but whatever one thinks of him, Louis Riel, remains one of the most controversial figures in Canadian history. Does this man who has continued to haunt Canadian history for more than a century after his execution, deserve all of those descriptions? After reading three different interpretations of the rebellions, it is still difficult to decide which is closer to the truth. All three authors retold the Metis history and although they differ on crucial issues, there was agreement on the basic facts. The primary difference amongst the three authors was whether the Canadian and Manitoban governments acted in good faith in carrying out the terms of the Manitoba Act, whether John A. MacDonald purposely deceived the Metis as to what Canada’s intentions were with respect to the Canada-Metis Agreement and to what extent were there deceptions in the administration of the Metis land grants. How these three historians attempt to encapsulate Riel’s life, accomplishments, and mistakes is very different. How they attempt to separate fact from fiction and decide whether Riel was justified in his actions against the government is written from three very different perspectives. Where their sympathies lie, how subjective they are and how they interpret the facts is quite evident, but there are many sides to history and every side must be examined if a fair judgment is to be made. One can surmise that historians have probably debated quite heatedly the rights and wrongs of all the players in the Red River Rebellion, and the Northwest Rebellion. Authors like Stanley, in his book, The Birth of Western Canada believe t... ... middle of paper ... ...ch of their own bias. No doubt for years, decades, maybe even centuries to come, historians will still be debating whether Riel was a hero and a patriot, or as the government claimed, a traitor! Bibliography: 1G.F.G. Stanley, The Birth of Western Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1961) 88. 2Stanely 105-106. 3Stanley 205. 4Stanely 255. 5Stanley 251. 6Stanley 261 7Stanely 244. 8Stanley 214. 9Stanley 407. 10Stanley 48-49. 11 D. Sprague, Canada and the Metis, 1869-1885 (Waterloo Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 1991) 157. 12Sprague 174. 13 Sprague 175 14 Thomas Flanagan, Riel and The Rebellion 1885 Reconsidered (Saskatoon: Western Producer Prairie Books, 1984) 83. 15Flanagan 26. 16Flanagan 27. 17Flanagan 51. 18Flanagan 47. 19Flanagan 49. 20Flanagan 71. 21Flanagan 99-100. 22Flanagan 145. 23Flanagan 146.
To begin Sprague argues that the Canadian Government disingenuously mismanaged Metis land organization. Sprague states that evidence of this can be seen in the Canadian government not allowing the Lieutenant Governor Adams G. Archibald to make changes to Section 31 and 32 of the Manitoba Act. Archibald proposed the government grant outlined in Section 31 should allocate each person of Aboriginal ancestry an allotment of “140 acres” (pg.75) of land. Archibald also suggested that the location of these allotments be in close proximity so as to “not disperse families throughout the province” (Pg. 75). Lastly Archibald proposed a suggestion in carrying out Section 32 which insured that land owned was not jeopardized during the process of confederacy. He recommended that Manitoba be recognized as an independent province such that affairs including land ownership would be dealt with on a provincial level. Therefore as Sprague argues Archibald’s words were not taken into consideration by both the governments of John A. Macdonald and Alexa...
“I know that through the grace of God, I am the founder of Manitoba,” (Riel, 1885). This quote, by Louis Riel whilst he was on trial in Regina still stands true in today where Manitobans we are constantly feeling the presence of Riel’s legacy and accomplishments. He was the one who originally set the rights that Manitobans and Métis should have. Yet another way he affected Manitoba was in the Manitoba Act of 1870. Furthermore, he gave not only Manitobans, but French-Canadians and Métis alike an icon to venerate. Manitoba would not be what it is today without Louis Riel.
The Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) represents the Métis community in Manitoba in political, cultural, social and economic matters (Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF), 2013). Manitoba Métis Federation, representing Métis in Manitoba, filed a claim asking for a declaration that the federal and provincial statutes, which affected the implementation of Manitoba Act provisions, were "constitutionally invalid” (Chartrand, p. 477, 1991). In Section 31 of Manitoba Act, 1870, it provided lands to the Métis people. Section 32 assured the settlers, Aboriginal or not, that their occupied lands in 1869 would not be “jeopardized” by the wave of newcomers (Sprague...
The history of Canada was flooded with many influential and incredible events, particularly during World War 1 and World War 2. During the 20th century, Canada got more involved in worldwide events. It was a very important period for Canada; it was where they gained their independence and progressed as a country. After this century, Canada was considered an important and powerful country. The three main 20th century events in Canadian history are the battle of Vimy Ridge, the change of woman’s rights and the battle of Juno Beach.
Is Canada a nation or has its control just switched empirical hands? As Professor Hutcheson asked, did Canada go from "Colony to Nation or Empire to Empire?" This question has greatly influenced Canada's changing identity since her birth as a British colony with Confederation in 1867 to the present day. The purpose of this essay is to critically analyse the shifting Canadian identities between the years 1890 to 1960. The objective is to illustrate Canada's transforming identity by using the novels The Imperialist by Sara Jeanette Duncan, Barometer Rising by Hugh MacLennan, and Fifth Business by Robertson Davies and to connect the stories of each of these works of fiction to the varying political, economic, and social issues of their times. Each book is written by a prominent author, and portrays an accurate reflection of the demanding political, economic, and social concerns throughout the late nineteen and first half of the twentieth century of Canadian history. All of the novels reflect Canada's peripheral view of the world, as opposed to a central point of view, because throughout its history Canada has always been perceived as a secondary player. As George Grant says in his literary piece Lament for a Nation, Canada is "a branch plant society" , meaning Canada is controlled by another power. The essential question is where has Canada's loyalties traditionally lay and how has this shaped the Canadian identity. The Imperialist by Sara Jeanette Duncan, written in 1904 reflects a very British influenced Canada. At this time, Canada is still a British colony under British rule, and the people of Canada are very content to consider themselves British. The novel predominately ill...
The trial of Louis Riel is one of the most debatable controversial topics in Canadian history, and to this day, 130 years after his death, there is still a debate on whether this man was a hero or a villain. Louis Riel is innocent. He is innocent because he was a man with a sense of self worth for himself and for his metis people, he was a man of pride, who could stand up for his people even after being betrayed, cheated and lied to by his own government multiple times.
Olthius and Townshend are in favour of native sovereignty within Canada based on historical and moral grounds. These authors believe there is a difference in perceptions between native and non-native Canadians regarding the jurisdiction over Canadian territory. In their essay, they write that Aboriginal people believe the Canadian state is oppressive and usurps the powers of Aboriginal people, while most non-aboriginals would be unlikely to question the status of the Canadian state. The essay contends that before European settlement, First Nations people had stability in their economic and political structures. Although their style was different than that of European nations, there was recognition of sovereignty of aboriginal lands. Acquisition of land in Canada did not come from conquest; rather it came primarily in the form of land transaction treaties. However, the treaties did little to support the claim of Canadian sovereignty since they are mostly unclear about issues of jurisdiction. A secondary way of claiming land for European settlement was through discovery of vacan...
Louis Riel was an influential Canadian politician, founder of the Province of Manitoba, and a spokesperson of the Metis peoples of Canada. Louis Riel is widely know as one of the most controversial people in Canada’s historiography, leading the Metis peoples of Canada in their resistance against the Canadian government in the Canadian Northwest.
This paper will look into the historical factors and circumstances that led to the Red River Resistance. The Red River Resistance were the major conflict happened from 1869 to 1871, right after the confederation of Canada. The two parties that had conflict of interests were the Canadian government and the Metis. The Metis were the decedents of English and French and Aboriginal people. Over the years, they had developed their own social code and culture, in some level, isolated them from the mainstream Caucasian society. The Canadian government considered the Metis “violent, uncivilized, and a major deterrent to European settlement”, which meant that they had no intention to treat the Metis with
Louis Riel’s contributions to Canada are most evident in his advocating of Métis rights. His rise to power as a Métis leader began in 1869 when he emerged as one of the few individuals publically advocating the Métis cause in the Rupert’s Land negotiations between the Hudson Bay Company (HBC) and Canada. By the summer of 1869, Riel had begun advocating action against the surveying and gifting of Métis land to settlers. He convinced a multitude of men that a provisional government ought to be put in place to “[make] a clear protest against the injustice…done [by] Canada.” Riel became the government’s secretary, declaring that “the territory south of the Assiniboine belonged to the people of Red River…and that the Métis would not allow the survey to
For the Métis people, Louis Riel is regularly seen as a hero and spokesman for the rights of the people and their land. To others, he was a rebellious threat who was brought to justice for his criminal acts of treason against the country. The views towards this man are divided, some viewing him as a “victim of Ontario religious and racial bigotry” (Thomas, 1982) and others believe he was an insane man who was rightfully convicted. Today, his life is one of the most controversial and debated topics in Canadian history. Nevertheless, all sides can agree that Riel played a major role in the creation of the province of Manitoba and ultimately bringing attention to the rights of the Métis people. Riel would be a forceful advocate and influential
"I was not taken prisoner. I surrendered on purpose. I want to be judged on the merits of my actions. ... From the time of my arrival in Saskatchewan, I worked peacefully ... We didn’t make any aggressive military moves. ... In Batoche we defended ourselves” was the statement of Louis Riel, an innocent, yet controversial Metis man fighting for the rights of others. Riel, to some, is a hero, while is labelled as insane and a culprit by others. After analyzing the facts and the timeline of the historical events, I now conclude that Louis David Riel is an innocent man who was fighting for Metis rights against the Canadian government.
Throughout Canada’s history, many changes were occurring and still is until this day by very important prime ministers in the past 20th century as well as made what Canada for what it is. Each and every Great Prime Minister from the Liberal Party had a crucial role in their ways of thinking, actions, and achieving their objectives towards Canada.
The representations of the nation’s past have been selectively pieced together to present a narrow or idealistic picture of Canada’s history. Canada: A People’s History has focused their time and attention to generating a mass viewer base rather than a clear and detail oriented reality. This naive picture of the nation is presented as the “real” picture of Canada (Dick 191) from an Anglo-Canadian perspective of history rooted in tradition. Information is presented from the perspective of the narrator, as the author and not the voice of the larger audience (193). Viewers are to take what is presented to them as spoken truth. The narrative driven intent to tell stories negates historical accuracy and rejects the use of expert commentators (195-196).
Outline and assess the concept of “reinventing government”. What does it mean and what are its strengths and weaknesses? Does the reinvention thesis provide Canadian governments with a viable way to reform and restructure the nature and working of public administration in this country? Why or why not?