Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Symbolism in “The Painted Door” by Sinclair Ross
Symbolism in “The Painted Door” by Sinclair Ross
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Can there be no love without compromise? Must one always conform to the needs of their partner to keep the flame of love and passion ablaze? In the short story, “The Painted Door” by Sinclair Ross the idea of compromise is demonstrated through the character of Ann – the wife of a farmer – who believes that it is the sacrifice of her happiness that is responsible for the wellbeing of their marriage. However, such thoughts can lead to the buildup of emotions within an individual. Emotions that later lead to the development of rebellious thoughts through Ann’s mind. Demonstrating that if one is forced to compromise their happiness they may choose to pursue this happiness elsewhere. Evidence of which was displayed throughout the story from Ann’s
dull attitude towards John, to her rebellious thoughts regarding Steven and finally her actions leading up to Johns death. It is this idea of compromise that leads to a successful relationship. However, as one progresses throughout the story it is quite evident that the idea of compromise between Ann and John is about two very different things. To John the idea of compromise was to devote his life to Ann and to build a mortgage free farm for him and Ann to spend the rest of their lives on as demonstrated by “He wanted a mortgage-free farm; then a new house and pretty clothes for her” (Ross 291). Ann’s idea of compromise however was to conform to Johns every need for the wellbeing of their marriage. An idea that the two may have developed without ever it conversing upon; portraying to the reader the lack of communication that may have added to the development of these conflicting ideals.
In the short story, “The Painted Door”, John and Ann are a married couple, who have been together for seven years, and yet despite this fact, they still have trouble communicating. Ann wishes, from the very beginning of the story, that John would stay at home with her rather than go to check on his father. However, rather than expressing these sentiments exactly, she acts very cold towards him and insists that she’ll be perfectly fine, trying to guilt him into staying. Though it works, as John offers to stay with her rather than visiting his father’s farm, Ann decides to instead push away her feelings of spite and loneliness and allows him to leave, despite worrying about his safety and how she’s going to cope while John is gone. This is the
Take for occurrences, section 9, "men are somewhat Pollyannaish about the condition of their marriage, while their spouses are sensitive to the inconvenience." This is not generally so for one side or the other. It is increasingly that couples need to take in the dialect of the other individual and recollect what it took to get the individual
Ann and John, two characters from he short story "The Painted Door", do not have a very healthy relationship. John is a simple farmer who thinks the only way he can please his wife, Ann, is by working all day to earn money for her. However Ann would prefer him to spend more time with her. Their relationship is stressed even further when Ann is left at home alone with nothing to think about but their relationship because John has to go to his father’s house. The terrible snowstorm accentuates Ann’s feelings of loneliness and despair. John does not pay enough attention to Ann, and therefore creates a weak relationship.
I am not writing this to you looking for an explanation just acceptance and understanding. I wish for you not to immediately judge but to just read and have an open mind for what it is I am about to suggest.
Brockmeier’s short story represents a damaged marriage between a husband and a wife simply due to a different set of values and interests. Brockmeier reveals that there is a limit to love; husbands and wives will only go so far to continually show love for each other. Furthermore, he reveals that love can change as everything in this ever changing world does. More importantly, Brockmeier exposes the harshness and truth behind marriage and the detrimental effects on the people in the family that are involved. In the end, loving people forever seems too good to be true as affairs and divorces continually occur in the lives of numerous couples in society. However, Brockmeier encourages couples to face problems head on and to keep moving forward in a relationship. In the end, marriage is not a necessity needed to live life fully.
In individual searches to find themselves, Frank and April Wheeler take on the roles of the people they want to be, but their acting grows out of control when they lose sense of who they are behind the curtains. Their separate quests for identity converge in their wish for a thriving marriage. Initially, they both play roles in their marriage to please the other, so that when their true identities emerge, their marriage crumbles, lacking communication and sentimentality. Modelled after golden people or manly figures, the roles Frank and April take on create friction with who they actually are. Ultimately, to “do something absolutely honest” and “true,” it must be “a thing … done alone” (Yates 327). One need only look inside his or her self to discover his or her genuine identity.
First, I didn’t agree with Mr. A and Mrs. B’s actions in C. S. Lewis’s essay, "We Have No 'Right To Happiness". Therefore, I don’t think that Mr. A should have left his wife because she was not beautiful any more. Of course, maybe there is another side of the story that made him leave his wife. Also I didn’t think that Mrs. B should leave her husband, when he lost everything. However, the way Lewis presented his story is to convince me that they are very bad people. Overall, they justify their behavior simply by saying they have the right to happiness. Even though Lewis presented them very badly in his story, I’m not in a position to judge others’ actions. However, I’m not totally convinced that these are the people to leave their spouses. So no matter where they go, they may still find the same situation. Because that is life, and life can change any time.
A History of Marriage by Stephanie Coontz speaks of the recent idealization of marriage based solely on love. Coontz doesn’t defame love, but touches on the many profound aspects that have created and bonded marriages through time. While love is still a large aspect Coontz wants us to see that a marriage needs more solid and less fickle aspects than just love.
Love caused his logic and sensibility to fail him, and provoked him to commit monstrous acts that destroyed many lives. Through analysis of “Happy Endings” by Margaret Atwood, it can be concluded that one of her many intended lessons was to show the value and the powerful effects of love. Atwood successfully proved this lesson by using powerful examples of both successful and disastrous relationships to illustrate the positive and negative effects of love. Atwood truly demonstrated what it is like to follow your heart.
It is tremendously unfortunate that women are treated so ruthlessly in marriages that it leads to mental consequences. Glaspell illustrates, through the lens of Psychoanalytic Criticism in the sense that the woman becomes mentally tempered because of the way her husband treats her, a time when Hale is talking to Mrs. Peters regarding the wife’s mental health, “I wish you’d seen Minnie Foster when she wore a white dress with blue ribbons and stood up there in the choir” (152), stating the idea that before the woman gets married, she was full of life; however, when she does get married, she is treated very unfairly and soon has strange emotional effects. Gilman shows an instance when the wife is experiencing psychological effects, “the front pattern does move . . . the woman behind shakes it” (par. 189), explaining that because the wife is so fed up with the unequal way she is being treated and the fact that she has to stay in a room, she begins going insane. According to Harper and Sandberg while considering mental issues towards women in marriages, “martial process is a key player in the depression equation” (547); this explains the ideology that because some women are treated unfairly during marriage, psychological effects soon haunt the woman who is unhappy with the inequality. This is a prime example of an instance where psychological effects on women in marriages illustrate gender inequality. Moreover, emotional effects in marriages are explored, “partners who are able to find the closeness they needed in marriage were less likely to be depressed” (547). This explains the concept that because spouses are not “close,” regarding the fact that women are not treated equally, men treat women in a cruel manner and thus, cause women to be negatively harmed mentally because of how useless they feel, illustrating gender inequality.
In Margaret Atwood’s short story, “Happy Endings,” the central theme of fiction provides several different kinds of marriages and relationships that ultimately result in the same ending. The “Happy Endings” shows that it’s difficult to have complete control over day-to-day events. No matter how hard society tries to achieve the perfect life, it does not always go as planned. It doesn’t matter if the characters are bored and depressed, confused and guilty, or virtuous and lucky; the gradual path of version A is not always in reach.
Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance. If the disposition of the parties are ever so well known to each, or ever so similar before hand it does not advance their felicity in the least (Austen 23).
Barbara Graham’s article, “The future of love: kiss romance goodbye, it’s time for the real thing,” claims that because unrealistic expectations for romantic love may undermine marriage, we should develop a new model for love and relationships. Few can deny what Graham, author of the satire women who run with poodles and writer for vogue, silt, common boundary, Utne Reader, and other publications; calls that love yearning is shaped by myths and romantic fantasies. The problems in marriage are real, and Graham’s point of view is true and it could be achievable in reinvent the concept of marital relationship. So, developing a new model for love and relationships is good enough? Grahams point of view should be take into consideration but it will
"Old Man and Old Woman," a retelling of a Native American myth by Chewing Blackbones, a Blackfoot Indian, should serve as a lesson to all couples in how a good relationship works. In today’s society there is a great need for people to understand how to make their relationships successful. As the divorce rate gets higher every year; small children have begun to think that getting a divorce is something that is normal and to be expected. This story shows how to work through problems with a give-and-take approach where you make compromises, yet still stand up for yourself when you believe your convictions cannot be compromised.
Marital love is complex. It is a lot of work, and the harder we work at it the better it will serve us. We do not always have warm fuzzy evenings, candle lit dinners, strolls in the park, cuddling on a snowy day. Some days are outright tough with kids tugging left and right, and our partners talking about a rough day at work while one unscrews a spent light bulb that needs replacing. We sometimes find ourselves sitting by the window, watching people walk by with the sounds of the city in the background, just pondering our situations in life. And in an instant a soft blue ball flies from across the room distorting our moment. How does this correlate with Mrs. Mallard, we ask? Her experience of blissful notions with nature, “She could...