Comparison Of Piaget's Theory Of Cognitive Development

960 Words2 Pages

One of the basic premises of the Theory of Mind is that a person is able to distinguish between animate and inanimate objects. Once an animate object is identified, a person can allot mental states to oneself and the others, which may be different or similar from his/her own. Consider the following analogy, a child is able to distinguish language from the various paraphernalia of noise present in the environment . Also from a very young age, they are able to distinguish one word from the other and understand what each stands for. Not only this, but similar to adult humans, infants are also able to prioritize hierarchal structures over linear structures without ever having been taught to do so. As mentioned earlier, Chomsky’s Poverty of Stimulus theory, states that this phenomenon of universal grammar is a preexisting ability of the mind to identify, separate, understand and pick up language as a child. Scientifically, what and why this occurs is yet to be proven. But where did this ability evolve make sense of things and develop language. Using Chomsky and Piaget's theories, we can say that since conception, the foetus starts developing certain aspects related to language in it, as infants they pick upon stimuli that exist in their immediate environment. These stimuli must trigger off the existing triggers in an infant to start developing language and subsequently elicit certain behaviours in humans up to a particular age (Piaget's Concrete Operational Stage); after which language stabilizes and more emphasis is attached to comprehending and making sense of things, abstract and

Open Document