Comparison Of Into The Wild And Deliverance

1093 Words3 Pages

The movies Into The Wild and Deliverance both are about a group of people or person going out into the wilderness. Deliverance is about four men who canoed a river before it was going to be drained, but also for the four of them to experience nature because most of them had not before. Throughout their journey, they were tested constantly, by the weather, the river, and even other people. Their journey also led to interesting actions made that would seem surprising. Into the wild is about a young man by the name of Chris McCandless and his journey to him the wilderness of Alaska’s Denali national forest. Chris reason for his journey is that he left his home to try to find himself in the wilderness. Very ill-prepared Chris too was mentally challenged by the wilderness; He had to battle with animals and the unpredictable …show more content…

Ed’s decision to attempt to kill the man that potentially killed Drew showed that Ed had changed drastically throughout the course of the movie. We know that Ed is not the type of character to make a choice that in a way is unethical. Ed is more the type of person who would let Lewis make the decision and Ed would go along with that. Previously, in the movie, there was a point where Ed could have shot a deer but could not bring himself to do it. When Ed killed that man, it showed that the wilderness had changed Ed, in a way that could be a positive or negative change. Ed’s actions show that the wilderness can change people. The fact that wilderness the ability to bring something out of people is incredible. We do not know if Ed’s change was situational or a permanent change. The wilderness brought a new side of Ed, that maybe was always and he just needed a reason to bring it out, or he was fueled by the fact that Ed killed the man that killed Drew. Whatever the reason this is a great example how the wilderness has the power to change the way a person

Open Document