Comparison Of Aristophanes's View Of Love

713 Words2 Pages

In the Symposium, both Aristophanes and Socrates give contrasting explanations of love. In this essay, I will explain how Aristophanes ' understanding of love, while fascinating, is unrealistic due to the fact that it presents the ultimate love between two humans as selfish in origin. Socrates ' understand is much more representative of what we consider to be an ideal romantic relationship.

Aristophanes explains his view of love using an ancient myth of humans that existed before we did. These people were round, with four legs, four arms, and two different faces. When these early humans tried to rebel against the gods, Zeus punished them by splitting them all in half. After this, the humans are described as having longed to be back together …show more content…

For example, say you have an elderly couple of soul mates who have been happily married with a healthy relationship for over sixty years. Realistically, this would be considered an ideal relationship. Now, imagine that the husband passes away and his wife outlives him. Despite the fact that they both lived full lives and shared a lifetime of love and growth, Aristophanic love would now consider his widow to be incomplete because she is living without the physical presence of her soul mate. Also, because they are now apart, Aristophanic love would have it that the widow 's joy and fulfillment from her marriage would be replaced with the relentless lust and longing to be with her husband again. This is a black-and-white view of complex emotions. Suppose her husband was suffering, and she knew that it was best that he was now at peace. The fact that she does not wish for her husband to be back on Earth with her should not diminish the fact that she still loves him just as …show more content…

She defined love 's purpose in her speech as "giving birth in beauty, whether in body or soul" (206C). Someone who seeks out beauty is spiritually uplifted, "starting out from beautiful things and using them like rising stars" (221C). In this explanation, love is more than just a self-serving desire. It is almost like a ladder to betterment. Diotima also makes the distinction that love is "being a lover" rather than "being loved" (204C). Where Aristophanes focuses on receiving being the main motivation in love, Diotima instead asserts that it should be

Show More
Related

  • Diotima's Speech: Phaedrus And Aristophanes

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristophanes believes that two humans used to be combined as one, and we were separated by the Gods because they thought we had too much power together. He thinks the purpose of love is to seek out our other half and be with them. In his speech, however, he fails to think about whether or not our other half is good or bad. Diotima takes goodness into account. She says “…a lover does not seek the half or the whole, unless, my friend, it turns out to be good as well” (205E). Her speech is superior to Aristophanes’ because she states clearly that you are not supposed to love someone unless they are good. By good I mean having knowledge and wisdom.

    Read More

  • Aristophanes' Views

    1810 Words  | 4 Pages

    prized. This of course was more of a problem for a rich husband than a

    Read More

  • Love and Duty in Virgil’s Aeneid and Augustine’s Confessions

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the Aeneid, love is depicted as an uncontrollable emotion. Venus and Juno promote the romance between Dido and Aeneas. Dido, the queen of Carthage, begins to fall in love with Aeneas, even though she has vowed to her late husband that she would set her “face against marriage” (Virgil 975). Aeneas falls in love with Dido and remains with her in Carthage, even though he knows that he must continue his travel to Rome. Love is a passion which consumes the soul in spite of its will. It is an “inward fire” (Virgil 976). Juno arranges it so that Dido and Aeneas consummate their love in a cave during a storm. Again, mortals have little or no control over their loves. The gods are the ones who cause people to fall in love.

    Read More

  • Gender-Based Notions of Homoerotic Love: Sappho and Plato’s Symposium

    1707 Words  | 4 Pages

    The poetry of Sappho, and the speeches in Plato’s Symposium both deal primarily with homoerotic love, although Sappho, one of the only female poets in Ancient Greece, speaks from the female perspective, while Plato’s work focuses on the nature of this love between men. There are several fundamental elements that are common to both perspectives, including similar ideals of youth and beauty, and the idea of desire as integral to both views on love. Despite these similarities, however, there is an important distinction, which can be understood in terms of Pausanias’ concepts of Common versus Celestial Love, where Sappho’s view represents Common Love, and the larger view of Symposium represents Celestial Love. While Sappho’s work is very much grounded in the physical realm, Plato emphasizes that true love is centralized in the mind, and that it is an intellectual and philosophical phenomenon.

    Read More

  • The Accounts Of Eros In The "symposium"

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    the time of Socrates and Plato. To them love was eros, a direct translation of

    Read More

  • Pausanias And Aristophanes's Speech Analysis

    1404 Words  | 3 Pages

    The ideas presented by the patrons in Plato’s Symposium differed immensely. All pertaining to a main topic, being love, but none having the same conclusion. Two speeches in particular, those of Pausanias and Aristophanes, seemed to oppose the most. Many elements of their arguments contradicted that of the others, none more than the origin of love and the whom is the eromenos of love.

    Read More

  • Socrates and Love

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates has Agathon confirm that when one does not have the thing that he desires and loves, that is when he desires and loves it. They agree that one "loves what he lacks and has not" (96). In Agathon's view of love that he expressed earlier, love is always of beautiful things. Therefore, if one loves what he lacks, then "Love lacks and has not beauty" (96), Socrates says. Agathon says this must be the case and no longer has any idea of his previous statements. If Love loves beautiful things, then it is not itself beautiful. And if everything beautiful is good, then love also lacks goodness.

    Read More

  • Two Types of Love in Plato's Symposium

    1223 Words  | 3 Pages

    I have always thought that there was only one type of love, which was that feeling of overwhelming liking to someone else. I am aware that Lust does exist and that it is separate from Love, being that the desire for someone's body rather their mind. In Plato's Symposium, Plato speaks of many different types of love, loves that can be taken as lust as well. He writes about seven different points of view on love coming from the speakers that attend the symposium in honor of Agathon. Although all these men bring up excellent points on their definitions on love, it is a woman that makes the best definition be known. I will concentrate on the difference between the theory of Common and Heavenly love brought up by Pausanias and the important role that Diotima plays in the symposium.

    Read More

  • Aristophanes Views On Love

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Symposium, a most interesting view on love and soul mates are provided by one of the characters, Aristophanes. In the speech of Aristophanes, he says that there is basically a type of love that connects people. Aristophanes begins his description of love by telling the tale of how love began. He presents the tale of three sexes: male, female, and a combination of both. These three distinct sexes represented one’s soul. These souls split in half, creating a mirror image of each one of them. Aristophanes describes love as the search for the other half of your soul in this quote: “When a man’s natural form was split in two, each half went round looking for its other half. They put their arms around one another, and embraced each other, in their desire to grow together again. Aristophanes theme is the power of Eros and how not to abuse it.

    Read More

  • True Love In Edith Hamilton's Mythology

    769 Words  | 2 Pages

    Love is often misconstrued as an overwhelming force that characters have very little control over, but only because it is often mistaken for the sum of infatuation and greed. Love and greed tread a blurred line, with grey areas such as lust. In simplest terms, love is selfless and greed is selfish. From the agglomeration of mythological tales, people deduce that love overpowers characters, even that it drives them mad. However, they would be wrong as they would not have analyzed the instances in depth to discern whether or not the said instance revolves around true love. Alone, true love help characters to act with sound reasoning and logic, as shown by the tales of Zeus with his lovers Io and Europa in Edith Hamilton’s Mythology.

    Read More

  • The Danger of Love: Antigone by Sophocles

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nearly everyone experiences the feeling of love. Whether it’s for another person or for food, almost everyone feels love during their lifetime. In the play Antigone, the writer, Sophocles, illustrates a very important fact regarding love: love is our most important and most dangerous motivation for doing anything, and without moderation, love can be deadly.

    Read More

  • Forms of Love in Plato's Symposium

    2571 Words  | 6 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... Then Diotima summed up the object of Love as “the permanent possession of goodness for oneself”. 48. In another aspect, Love’s purpose is to attain immortality.

    Read More

  • Platonic Love In The Symposium By Alcibiades

    469 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Plato, love is seen from different viewpoints. Alcibiades speech gives us an understanding of platonic love. Platonic love, according to Plato “is the kind of love that involves the affectionate relationship between men without sexual intimacy”. In the Symposium, Alcibiades enters the symposium very drunk and tells a story about his failure to seduce Socrates. I believe Alcibiades story exemplifies the soul and body as two working together to reach knowledge and wisdom but fails.

    Read More

  • Socrates' View Of Love

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    to find the truth in love. He was the “ideal lover of wisdom”, never allowing

    Read More

  • Philosophy of love

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some people believe that there is no such thing as “true love” they believe that love is nothing but an illusion designed by social expectations. These people believe that love ultimately turns into pain and despair. This idea in some ways is true. Love is not eternal it will come to an end one way or another, but the aspect that separates true love from illusion, is the way love ends. “True Love” is much too powerful to be destroyed by Human imperfection; it may only be destroyed by a force equal to the power of love. Diotima believed that “Love is wanting to posses the good forever” In other words love is the desire to be immortal and the only way that we are able to obtain immortality is through reproduction, and since the act of reproduction is a form of sexual love, then sexual love is in fact a vital part of “True love”. Sexual love is not eternal. This lust for pleasure will soon fade, but the part of love that is immortal, is a plutonic love. You can relate this theory to the birth of love that Diotima talks about. She says that love was born by a mortal mother and immortal father. The mother represents the sexual love, the lust for pleasure. The father represents the plutonic love that is immortal. Plutonic love is defined as a true friendship, the purest of all relationships. A true plutonic love will never die; it transcends time, space, and even death.

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Aristophanes's View Of Love

Open Document