Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient romes military issues
The Trojan War a review
The Trojan War a review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After the death of Roman general, statesman, and dictator, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, two very wealthy and powerful men of Rome, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Marcus Licinius Crassus began to grow hostile towards one another over power and leadership roles. Due to the fact that both men were backed by armies of their own, this was not viewed as a simple quarrel between two men. In efforts to avoid civil war, Julius Caesar suggested a three-way alliance. This unofficial partnership is known as the first Triumvirate. Having earned his title of Magnus for his countless victories and conquest, Pompey was Rome’s most famous general. Likewise, Julius Caesar was known for his eloquent speeches in the Senate, but it was his martial talents shown in Gaul and Britannia that were swiftly rising him up the ladder, making way for a new legend. Lastly, Marcus Licinius Crassus was not only a successful politician, but also the richest man in Rome. For …show more content…
him,being well respected and wealthy wa snot enough. Crassus became increasingly jealous of Caesar and Pompey. They both had something that he did not but wanted very badly, eventually risking and losing his own life for it. Crassus was hungry for power. It wasn’t until Caesar began to exhibit military prowess, that Crassus immediately decided to seek out conquest of his own. Out of greed for power and the recognition of successfully invading a region, in the Summer of 53B.C., Crassus decided to invade the city of Parthia. He did this without the permission of the Roman Republic. Likewise, Crassus failed to obtain permission from Armenian King, Artavasdes II to invade through his territory. Crassus and his army of 40,000 men, & legions, and some cavalry traveled to Carrhae across the open plains of Mesopotamia. In this battle the Roman army’s strategy was not successful against the parthians. While known for having many techniques and tactics, the Romans had no idea what the Parthians had in store. After obtaining word of the presence of the parthian army drawing near, Crassus appeared to have panicked. His troops were extremely exhausted and worn out after a long and quick march across the Mesopotamian desert. Unfortunately, his army had no time to rest. Instead, Crassus began to form battle lines. Although he was advised to stretch out in classic battle formation, Crassus believed in setting his men up in a formation called "testudo." This formation would essentially block out enemies. The Romans believed that by doing this, they were creating a wall of steel. However, traveling through open plains allowed the General Surena and his 10,00 calvary, which included 1,000 cataphracts, to surround the Roman army and defeat them. As the battle opened a shower of Parthian arrows fell down onto the Romans. Crassus ordered his son Publius to attack the archers with his Gallic cavalry and a unit of infantry. Initially, Publius drove back the horse archers, but by doing this he found himself a long ways away from the main Roman body. The Parthians cut off his force, surrounding it with horse archers and the cataphracts. Publius became overwhelmed. Trapped away from his father and the rest of the army, Publius ordered his own death at the hand of one of his men, and the Roman cavalry was slaughtered. Crassus then reorganized his lines in the traditional Roman style and ordered a general advance. As he was getting his army ready, the parthians who had defeated Publius and his cavalry rode in front of the Roman army with Publius’ head on a spear. After seeing this, Crassus lost his will to continue fighting. During the night, he then ordered a retreat to save the remaining of his army. As the battle came to an ending, General Surena organized a meeting to call a truce. Reluctant at first, Crassus decided to attend. However, to his demise, the meeting was a trap. Crassus was killed in a scuffle after realizing he was set up. Some sources state that when he was killed the parthian king poured molten gold on his teeth and down his throat to show how greed had taken over him. Most ancient sources, however, identify Crassus' motives as a combination of greed and ambition-that is, a desire for glory. In the end, 20,000 Roman soldiers were killed. 10,000 soldiers were captured and a luck 10,000 escaped. Wounded Roman soldiers were left on the battlefield to perish or be captured. The parthian army only lost about 1,000 soldiers. The battle of Carrhae provides historians with an example of how numbers are insignificant.
The Parthian army in total only had about 11,000 warm bodies, as opposed to the 40,000 men that made up the Roman army. General Surena and his army came prepared, knowing that they were outnumbered close to three times over. From this battle, one can also analyze the effectiveness of battle formations. Although Crassus was advised to set up his army in a proven successful formation, he decided to decline the advice and set the ranks in the way he thought would work. Lastly, this battle is significant to the study of Greek and Roman because one can review the different battle tactics that may or may not have been successful. By Publius seperating from the rest of the army, he made himself and his cavalry an obvious target. It can be assumed that if he would have worked with the Roman army instead of separating himself, the outcome for him and the Roman army as a whole could have been different, and possibly more desirable to the Roman
army.
"By uncompromising refusal to meet the demands of Pompey, Caesar and Crassus the senate naturally drove them into each others arms. The three men agreed to form a political amicitia ....."
Plutarch writes of Caesar’s character, “He had an ability to make himself liked which was remarkable in one of his age, and he was very much in the good graces of the ordinary citizen because of his easy manners and the friendly way in which he mixed with people” (Plutarch 257). By examining Caesar’s character, one can understand how he used his love of the people to gain power and to keep it with his military victories which had brought a vast amount of wealth and land to Rome. Caesar embarked on creating Rome’s biggests debts in order to achieve friends. Plutarch remarks on Caesar’s enemies who “thought that this influence of his would soon come to nothing, once he stopped spending money, and they stood aside and watched it grow among the common people. Later on it had become too great for anything to be done about it, and was plainly aimed at a complete revolution in the state” (Plutarch 257). Caesar relied on friendship, and used his friends tactically in forming the First Triumvirate with Pompey and Crassus, and he was able to gain their followers while also establishing his own name. Caesar learned from Sulla’s decree of proscriptions on one’s enemies and instead pardoned his enemies to make them his friends. This ultimately would turn out be disastrous for Caesar, as those whom he pardoned would switch sides at the last minute and stab
The Audiences' Perception of Cassius and Brutus in Shakespeare Julius Caesar was one of the most influential political and military leaders in history, and helped establish the vast Roman empire. Caesar’s triumph in a civil war amongst others made him the absolute ruler of Rome, but political jealousies and fears that he would become king among his opponents led to his assassination. In 59 BC the Senate decided on a Triumvirate to lead them rather than electing two consuls. The three men were Julius Caesar, Pompey the Great and Marcus Licinius Crassus. When Caesar returned to Rome in 60 BC after a year as governor of Spain, he joined forces with Crassus and Pompey to form the First Triumvirate.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar and Homer’s epic poem The Odyssey, loyalty is strongly presented as a major motif. In both texts, loyalty is highly valued as one of the most important traits to a person’s character. Not only do the loyal characters receive better fates, but those who are not loyal are punished for the actions, usually through revenge. In Julius Caesar, the characters that remained loyal to Caesar are the few who wind up alive at the end of the play, and in The Odyssey, those who remained loyal to Odysseus were rewarded by Odysseus, and those who weren’t were killed.
Would an honorable man murder his best friend? In William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar started as an innocent citizen of Rome, but soon made his way to the throne. Caesar started bettering Rome, but certain men accused him of becoming too ambitious. The conspirators, the men against Caesar, brutally murdered him because of his “ambition”. Marcus Brutus was Caesar’s supposed best friend but led the revolt against him. Brutus is characterized in the play as being gullible, noble, and naïve.
Making the right decisions is an ongoing struggle for man, because making decisions is never easy, and the wrong decision can lead to endless perils. Decisions must be made when dealing with power, loyalty, and trust. Yet, unlike other decisions, ones that are about these three fields are the most important, due to the risk involved, and because of the consequences that might follow.
Caesar was popular among the citizens because he had created a stable government and did a lot for the city of Rome. Roman senators were scared that Caesar was beginning to have too much power so they murdered him. Following his death, Caesar’s friends and family wanted revenge. His cousin, Marcus Antonius, friend, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, and nephew, Gaius Octavius Thurinus, also known as Octavian, joined forces to form the Second Triumvirate. Similar to the men in the First Triumvirate, these three men were also aggressive and seeking more power. Immediately after they rose to power, Lepidus was granted Hispania and Africa to rule over, which made him satisfied and out of the affairs in Rome. Octavian and Antonius agreed that Octavian would rule the west and Antonius the east but because of Antonius’ connection with Queen Cleopatra, Octavian was disappointed with the unbalance. This feud eventually led up to another civil war when Antonius, along with Cleopatra’s army, went into war with Octavian and his army. Octavian came out victorious and Antonius and Cleopatra both decided to commit suicide. With Octavian in power, he send Lepidus into exile and changed his name to
The title of the historic tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare implies that Caesar is the tragic hero. Although Caesar is a universal character, William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar should have been titled Brutus because he is the real tragic hero.
In 1599, when the play was first performed, Queen Elizabeth I had sat on the throne for nearly forty years, enlarging her power at the expense of the aristocracy and the House of Commons. As she was then sixty-six years old, her reign seemed likely to end soon, yet she lacked any heirs (as did Julius Caesar). Many feared that her death would plunge England into the kind of chaos that had plagued England during the fifteenth-century Wars of the Roses. In an age when censorship would have limited direct commentary on these worries, Shakespeare could nevertheless use the story of Caesar to comment on the political situation of his day.
Unfortunately for Caesar, many aristocratic people tried to disgrace or embarrass him. They revolted against him, but his political career was stable and was not harmed (Gruen,12). Thinking in his best interest, Julius Caesar allied himself with Gnaeus Pompey. First Triumvirate seemed to hold great, high power. Being a great military leader and idol to many, Pompey helped Caesar be elected as consul in 59 B.C. Though they used violence and wrong bribery, this was a major v...
Julius Caesar - A Comparison of Brutus and Cassius In the play Julius Caesar, written and performed by William Shakespeare, there are many characters, but two, Brutus and Cassius, stood out. The play begins in Rome, where a celebration of Julius Caesar's victory over the former ruler of Rome, Pompeii. The victory leads to Caesar's betrayal by his jealous companions. Senators and other high status figures are jealous of Caesar's new and growing power, while others, like Brutus, fear the tyrannical rule Caesar could enforce.
One of the first occasions presented was the plotting of Caesar’s assassination. Cassius, Casca, Trebonius, Ligarius and the other conspirators all wanted to rid Rome of Caesar. However, not one of them could give the green light.” They needed one who held a high place in the hearts of the people, to support them and to justify their actions. They needed an “honorable” man. Without this man, the conspirators would not be called conspirators for they would not have had sufficient strength to see it through. In that, there would not have been a conspiracy. Marcus Brutus agreed to be their source of strength. This final decision to join Cassius and company marked the end of Julius Caesar.
Caesar’s personal history and rise to power, through his first time as consul and presence in the First Triumvirate,
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is an intimate portrayal of the famed assassination of Julius Caesar and the complex inner workings of the men who committed the crime. In one particularly revealing scene, two of the men closest to Caesar, one a conspirator in his murder and one his second-in command, give orations for the deceased. Despite being simple in appearance, these two speeches do much of the work in developing and exposing the two characters in question. Though both have a love for Caesar, Mark Antony's is mixed with a selfish desire for power, while Brutus' is pure in nature, brought to a screeching halt by his overpowering stoicism. These starkly-contrasted personalities influence the whole of the play, leading to its tragic-but-inevitable end.
Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare. The play tells the tragedy of Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was one of the greatest leader of Roman history. Caesar had many victorious moments in history and continued to grow more and more powerful. When he had started to govern Rome hatred by some people had grew. He had liberally gave many a spot to hold an important position. Even though he helped the nobility, they had betrayed him. They secretly were planning a way to cause Caesar’s death. Then plan was portrayed by Cassius and he had convinced Brutus to join along with his plan also. On March 15th they had circled around Caesar and stabbed him numerous of times thus, Caesar had fallen to the ground by his last stab by Brutus. Throughout the entire play Caesar and Brutus are notably different. Caesar is very egoistic, while Brutus is very considerate and is mannerly to others. Caesar is an extrovert, while Brutus is an introvert. Caesar is ambitious and Brutus is not ambitious.