Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of a report for auschwitz
Introduction of a report for auschwitz
Introduction of a report for auschwitz
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction of a report for auschwitz
Scottie Maher
Hour 1
Hangings Compare and Contrast
“He was about to signal his aides to pull the chair from under the young man's feet when the latter shouted, in a strong and calm voice: ‘Long live liberty! My curse on Germany! My curse! My—’” The two hangings are similar because during both executions a verdict is read, the Jews are forced to watch, and the Jews are forced to take their caps off and quickly put them back on. They differ in who is being hanged, the Jews overall mood after the hangings, and the Nazi’s overall mood as the the execution proceeds. The hangings differ in who is being hanged because it is a tall and strong young man during the first and a small pipel during the second. The soup tastes better than ever to the prisoners after the first hanging and there is a general mood of hope. After the second, all hope is lost and the soup tastes
…show more content…
of corpses.
The Nazis carry on protocol as usual throughout the first hanging, and everything seems routine. During the second, the Nazis seem nervous, and protocol is broken. Before both hangings, someone reads a verdict showing what the how the person being hanged is guilty. The Jews are also forced to take their caps off and quickly put them back on as a sign of respect. While the hangings proceeds, The Jews are forced to watch and do a walk by of both of the victims. The hangings have many similarities.
The first similarity that the hangings share is that before both hangings are executed, a verdict is read. It is meant to show the Jews why the culprit deserves to be hanged, but also to scare them. The Nazis clearly say, “prisoner number … is condemned to death. Let this be a warning and an example to all prisoners.” The Nazis want the Jews to know that if they do the same thing as the people being hanged, their fates are going to be the same as
well. The second similarity is that the Jews are forced to watch both executions, as well as walk by and see the victims up close. “The Kapos forced everyone to look him squarely in the face.” This is another scare tactic that the Nazis use to mess with the Jews mental stability. During the first hanging, they are forced to look at the young man square in the face, and it does not seem to have a major effect on them. During the second hanging, they are forced to watch the little pipel writhe and struggle for half an hour, and Elie walks past him while he is still clinging to life. The third similarity is that the Jews are forced to take their caps off and put them back on before and after each hanging. To the Germans during World War II and even in modern culture, removing of the caps is a sign of respect. It is an action that shows caring and respect toward something. However, in Jewish culture, removing their caps is not respectful. Keeping your caps on is a sign of respect and humility in Jewish culture, and removing their caps is an insult. The Nazis make the Jews to remove their caps and put them back on as a sign of respect, but they insult the Jewish culture indirectly. They make them remove them and cover their heads very fast, as to not prolong their insult. The caps are removed and put back four times throughout the hangings, and the Jews are insulted each time. There are many differences between the hangings including who is being hanged, the Nazis mood as the hanging happens, and how the Jews feel after the hanging is over. A young and strong man is the first to be hanged. He is very experience in the camp and has been there for three years. After he is hanged, there is still a feeling of hope in the camp. At the second hanging, a little pipel is hanged. After the hanging a prisoner exclaims, “For God’s sake, where is God?” The prisoners cannot bear the fate of this pipel. The second difference is the mood after the hangings. The prisoners are hopeful. They have a feeling that if they do everything they are supposed to, and listen to the Nazis, they will not be hanged. This is why, “the soup tasted better than ever.” It tasted this way because of the hope they had. This greatly differs from the mood after the second hanging. The young pipel is hanged, and the feeling after is not hopeful. All hope is lost among the prisoners because they feel that if the Nazis will hang a boy, they will hang anyone. After the second hanging, the soup tasted of corpses. This symbolizes the lost hope that have of living. The Jews struggle with hope throughout both hangings. The third difference is the Nazis mood throughout the hangings. During the first, everything goes according to plan. The Lagerkapo administers the hanging, and the verdict is read. During the second hanging, nothing is routine. “The SS seemed more preoccupied, more worried, than usual.” The voice of the announcer shakes as the verdict is read. The Lagerkapo does not administer the hanging, and the SS administers it instead. After the execution, when the Lagerkapo screams for the Jews to take their caps off, his voice quivers. The Nazis know that what they are doing is serious, and there is no excuse to hang a child. Throughout both hangings, the Jews try to grasp at hope. They still have it after the first hanging, and after the second hanging it is lost. The hangings are similar because during both a verdict is read, the Jews are forced to closely witness the executions, and they are forced to take their caps off and put them back on. They differ in the people who are being hanged, the prisoners mood after the hangings, and how the Nazis act throughout the hangings. A verdict is read before both hangings identifying what the culprits did wrong. The Jews are forced to watch the hangings happen, and to look at the victims as they walk back to their barracks after the executions. They are also forced to take their caps off and put them back on quickly as a submissive sign of respect. The first difference in the hangings is that a young pipel and a strong and tall man are hanged. The second difference is that the Jews have hope after the first hanging and after the second all hope is lost. The third difference is that protocol is kept to during the first and abandoned during the second. The Jews After the second hanging, the Jews lose all hope. They ask where God is. “Where He is? This is where---hanging here from this gallows…”
About halfway through his imprisonment, Eliezer had gotten accustomed to life in a concentration camp. Despite the magnitude of death in every camp Elie was held hostage, nothing was worse than when three people were hanged in front of his eyes. The people were convicted suspiciously without confirmation of their crime; the youngest of which was about a twelve year old boy who was an assistant to one of the Nazi Kapos. After this experience, Wiesel writes, “That night, the soup tasted of corpses.” (65). The author incorporates a metaphor for his feelings and related it to the soup Eliezer was given; the soup did not literally taste like corpses, but this was how he felt because of all the death. The symbolism of his soup tasting like corpses relates to how death was surrounding Wiesel at the camp, and it also represents how he has lost faith in God. There were many places throughout the book in which Elie experiences things that make him question his faith, none more than when he thought there would be no chance of his
At this point, the speaker's newfound empathy toward the killer prompts his diatribe about American support of capital punishment. He begins with a hypothetical portrayal of an audience chaotically discussing the meaning of the word "kill," each person exclaiming "how they spell it" and "what it means to them." Subsequently, he recounts a story about insensitive reporters at a hanging, followed by a claim that "we throw killers in one grave / and victims in another. We form sides / and have two separate feasts." While the speaker may seem to be utilizing the description of the audience and the story of the reporters in order to denounce the mindset of his peers, he is in fact condemning his own former mentality. By denying five times that he is a witness, the speaker avoids the guilt that results from involvement in the death of another man. Through his repeated use of the phrase "I am not a witness," he essentially enables and catalyzes the execution of the killer, dismissing his humanity and conforming to the opinion that he deserves to be killed; however, once the speaker recognizes his fault and his conformity to this mindset, the tone of the poem suddenly shifts. The speaker's empathy for the killer reaches its maximum when he fully understands the pain of the condemned and finally sees the killer as his equal, which prompts his own admission of guilt and prior indifference: "I am a
One way they are similar is they both operated by fear. During the Salem witch trials everyone is in fear so they hang people with no evidence. The reason Guantanamo Bay became a prison was to detain terrorist after 9/11. People were scared of terrorist so they wanted them taken care of any way possible. Therefore, they allowed the U.S. Government to lock people up with no evidence. In both these situations spectral
The Salem Witch trial and the Holocaust were very similar event because the people in both of these event were oppressed and were treated under harsh conditions, but the people that were affected by the Salem Witch trials were in better conditions than the people living during the Holocaust and the concentration camps. During the Salem Witch trials, the people involved it were given proper living conditions, while in the Holocaust, they were unbearable for most people.
In the poem "The Hangman," by Maurice Ogden, the poet explained that a person could resolve a situation by showing acts of courage. One day, a hangman came to a town and built a scaffold on the courthouse square. The townspeople asked him which criminal would be hanged and he replied with a mischievous grin and a glint in his eye that it would be the person who will continually make his job easier. When the hangman spotted a foreign person, he chose him to be the first victim. The townsfolk were relieved that they weren't picked to be hanged, and that the gallows frame would be gone the next day. However, after they saw that it was still there, the hangman said that the foreigner was used to determine how strong the hemp was. When a man cri...
The author compares the unjustness of the Salem witch trails and the McCarthy trials were in both, people were accused and executed.
The hostile interrogation of numerous innocent people occurs during both time periods. During the McCarthy trials, the inquisitors attempt to use slippery tactics to implicate...
The second prisoner was a young boy who was being hanged for the fact that he stole weapons during a power failure. The significance of this particular hanging was the young boy’s lack of rebellion, his quiet fear and the unbearable duration of his torment. The boy had lost all hope and was one of the only victims who wept at the knowledge of their demise. What made this case different from the rest was not only his youth, but also his silence, and emotion and the fact that it took a half an hour for him to die, as a result of the lightness of his young body. Even though he was constantly tortured and provoked by the guards before he was hanged, he still said nothing, unlike the two people who joined him, who both shouted in defiance. His quiet courage really stood out as an unspoken and unannounced rebellion not only for the Jews, but it showed the doubts that some of the guards began to have. “This time, the Lagerkapo refused to act as executioner.” Although this quote is one sentence it still shows the effect the boy had on everyone in the camp. Even though the prisoners had been living with the constant presence of death, the execution of this young boy made them feel emotion they believed they had lost forever. This death was an unsaid act of rebellion in the sense that it showed the audience that there was indeed still some sensitivity left no matter how much both the prisoners and the guards were dehumanized: the prisoners as merely a number, and the guards as ruthless
Even when they are about to be hanged, they have been found guilty of a crime that has not been committed, the people are still squabbling over their own situations, they are all thinking about how they will benefit from the situation. Midway through the judge realises his mistakes but decides he cannot let anyone off the hook as it will make him look bad, he has already hanged 12 people so he must continue, "Postponement now speaks a floundering on my
Right from the start, the author begins to reveal his judgment on capital punishment before he introduces his essay. This judgement is apparent in the title ‘Kinder Executions’. The author uses this not only in the title but also throughout the entire essay. The word kinder contradicts the common meaning of
The pleasure of relieving stress in George Orwell's essay "A Hanging" was detailed by his thoughts written as one of the executioners. This character drank alcohol to relieve the painful memories of escorting the prisoner to the gallows. The character would have rather saved the man from hanging when the author wrote "It is curious, but till that moment I had never realized what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man" (pg 89). Orwell describes in detail how the condemned man "was not dying, he was alive just as we are alive all the organs of his body were working, bowels digesting food, skin renewing itself, nails growing, tissues forming, all toiling away in solemn foolery." (pg 89). The author continues to illustrate the character's mental anguish when he says "he and we were a party of men walking together, seeing, hearing, feeling, understanding the same world, and in two minutes with a sudden snap, one o...
The author’s purpose is to also allow the audience to understand the way the guards and superintendent felt towards the prisoners. We see this when the superintendent is upset because the execution is running late, and says, “For God’s sake hurry up, Francis.” And “The man ought to have been dead by this time.” This allows the reader to see the disrespect the authority has towards the prisoners.
He persuades the audience by using verbal irony and statistics. When he first mentions prison, he uses verbal irony towards the subject to express his true attitude towards imprisonment by saying that locking people in cages is more humane than punishing them physically (197). This statement is ironic because he actually believes that imprisonment is a worse punishment than corporal punishment but says that it is more humane to ridicule the opposing argument. This irony serves its purpose of telling the audience that prison is
The Book of Execution: An Encyclopedia of Methods of Judicial Execution by Geoffrey Abbott Reprint edition (August 1995) Trafalgar Square
One of the most well-known trials is the Nuremberg trials. The Nuremberg trials were a sequence of 13 trials that took place in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1949. According to history.com, “Nuremberg had been the site of annual Nazi propaganda; holding the postwar trials there marked the symbolic end of Hitler’s government.” The people that were going to be charged were Nazi Party Officials, high-ranking military officers, German industrialists, doctors, and lawyers. They were charged with crimes against peace and humanity. The leader of the Nazi’s, Adolf Hitler took his own life before he could be tried. During the trials, the m...