More handpicked essays just for you.
Research on corporal punishment in america
Short note on corporal punishment
Corporal punishment abstract paper summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Bring back flogging, Jeff Jacob argues that the current criminal justice system in America is not effective or successful. He then suggests that America should bring back the old fashioned form of punishment once used by the puritans, flogging, as an alternative to imprisonment (198). Also, he says that corporal punishment is a better way to punish criminals since it is less costly for the state (98). He appeals to pathos and uses statistics to prove his thesis and persuade the audience. His argument that the current criminal justice system is not working is extremely convincing; however, he gives no reason why corporal punishment is the best alternative to imprisonment and never offers any other options. Additionally, he does not make
He persuades the audience by using verbal irony and statistics. When he first mentions prison, he uses verbal irony towards the subject to express his true attitude towards imprisonment by saying that locking people in cages is more humane than punishing them physically (197). This statement is ironic because he actually believes that imprisonment is a worse punishment than corporal punishment but says that it is more humane to ridicule the opposing argument. This irony serves its purpose of telling the audience that prison is
Jacoby gives no evidence of corporal punishment decreasing crime in other countries and just assumes that it would. Additionally, he never defines the term “flogging.” This lack of specification is confusing for the reader as it is unclear what Jacoby is actually talking about. For example, the reader would probably have a different opinion if by “flogging” he meant striking or spanking the offender a couple times with a belt to administer temporary pain without long lasting effects or scars, than if “flogging” meant beating the offender mercilessly with a whip until skin is broken and blood is shed. The lack of providing a definition for the word “flogging,” makes it nearly impossible for the reader to form an opinion on whether or not flogging should be brought back as a method of punishing
In “Bring Back Flogging,” Jeff Jacoby, a journalist, argues why the current criminal justice system in America is not effective or successful. As a solution, he suggests that America should bring back the old fashioned form of punishment, flogging, once used by the Puritans as an alternative to imprisonment (198). This article originally appeared in the op-ed section of the Boston Globe. Therefore, the primary audience of this article is people who want to read arguments about controversial topics and have probably read some of Jacoby’s other articles. His argument that the current criminal justice system is not working is extremely convincing. He appeals to pathos and uses statistics to prove that thesis and to persuade the audience. However, he provides no reason why corporal punishment is the best alternative to imprisonment and never offers any other options. Additionally, he does not make an effort to explain why corporal punishment would be more effective or successful than imprisonment. Thus, in “Bring Back Flogging,” Jeff Jacoby successfully informs his audience of the dangers and problems with imprisonment by using verbal irony, appealing to the emotion of pity, incorporating logical
Those criminals residing on the Eastern side were punished through acts of stoning, flogging, and amputation of body parts. Although this sounds uncivilized, however when compared with the Western traditional form of imprisonment the lines between inhumanities become blurred. Chapman did a good job giving factual information supporting the inhumanities of Western imprisonment. He clearly identified different facts, in many different states, on how they fail to maintain there
Every civilized society makes laws that protect its values, and the society expects every single citizen to obey these laws. Whenever a citizen of a certain society breaks one of these laws, the rulers of the society dish out punishments they dim fit for the kind of crime committed. With this kind of justice system in place, criminals are either locked up in prison cells, whipped, or exiled from the society. In the essay, “Bring Back Flogging”, columnist Jeff Jacoby argues that flogging is much more superior to imprisonment and should be brought back as a method of punishing crime offenders like the Puritans did in the past. He is convinced that the shame associated with flogging would prevent offenders from going into crime professionally. Jacoby believes that whipping criminals has more educational value compared to locking them up in cells and that it saves a lot of money. Throughout the essay Jacoby attempts to build ethos even though it fell apart due to misconceptions. He relied mostly on the use of pathos by appealing to his reader’s emotions and using this as a base ground for his logos.
In Jeff Jacoby’s essay Bring Flogging Back, he discusses whether flogging is the more humane punishment compared to prison. Jacoby uses clear and compelling evidence to describe why prisons are a terrible punishment, but he lacks detail and information on why flogging is better. In the essay, he explains how crime has gotten out of hand over the past few decades, which has led to the government building more prisons to lock up more criminals. His effort to prove that current criminal punishment is not perfect or even effective is nicely done, but he struggled with discussing ways that flogging could lower the crime rates and provide a safer environment for America. Jacoby makes many claims about how crime in the United States has grown and the how faulty America’s justice system currently is.
Whenever an author is creating an argument, they must appeal to whatever grabs his or her selected audience’s attention. When given the topic of Michael Fay, an 18 year old American citizen who was punished in Singapore for vandalism by being caned, two sources appealed to their audience in two contrasting ways. In “Time to Assert American Values,” published by The New York Times, the author tries to capture his or her audience by stirring up emotion. In “Rough Justice: A Caning in Singapore Stirs up a Fierce Debate about Crime and Punishment,” Alejandro Reyes presents factual evidence throughout the entire article to support his claims. After carefully analyzing both texts, it is apparent that Alejandro Reyes gives a more convincing and sufficient argument due to his use of indisputable facts.
In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jeff Jacoby argues why the current criminal justice system in America is not effective or successful. As a solution, he suggests that America should bring back the old fashioned form of punishment once used by the puritans, flogging, as an alternative to imprisonment (198). This article originally appeared in the op-ed section of the Boston Globe newspaper. Therefore, the primary audience of this article is people who want to read arguments about controversial topics and have probably read some of his other articles. His argument that the current criminal justice system is not working is extremely convincing. He appeals to pathos and uses statistics to prove that thesis and to persuade the audience.
Gresham M. Sykes describes the society of captives from the inmates’ point of view. Sykes acknowledges the fact that his observations are generalizations but he feels that most inmates can agree on feelings of deprivation and frustration. As he sketches the development of physical punishment towards psychological punishment, Sykes follows that both have an enormous effect on the inmate and do not differ greatly in their cruelty.
The general acceptance, and sometimes support, of corporal punishment as a method of discipline is an aspect of the American culture (Barnett, Miller-Perrin, Perrin 61).
One of the most repetitive and controversial topics discussed in the criminal justice system, is the death penalty. Capital punishment has been a part of our nation’s history since the creation of our constitution. In fact, as of January 1st, 2016, 2,943 inmates were awaiting their fate on death row (Death Penalty Information Center). Throughout my life, I have always been a strong advocate for the death penalty. During the majority of my undergraduate degree, I was a fierce supporter of capital punishment when discussing the topic in classes. However, throughout many criminal justice courses, I found myself in the minority, regarding the abolishment of the death penalty. While debating this topic, I would always find myself sympathetic to the victims and their families, as one should be, wanting those who were responsible for heinous crimes to
One of the most alarming aspects of this book is the author’s mentality. Throughout the book, Hassine appears to be quite the well-rounded individual. He specifically regarded the prison mentality by saying: “If you throw a prisoner in a dark cave, he’ll learn how to see. In fact, if you give him enough rats, he’ll get fat. You can try feeding him cockroaches to punish him more, but he’ll eventually get fat on those too. As some inmates boast, ‘What doesn’t kill me, only makes me stronger (Hassine, Irwin, Bernard, McCleary, & Wright, 1999).” This quote displays Hassine being highly self-aware of his environment. As the book progressed, so did a sense of realization of the predicament that Hassine is in, in terms of incarceration. As Hassine described in the quote above, prisonization is a process, a difficult process, but is one that can be adaptable. The way Hassine described the prisonization mentality was approaching the topic with a more human perspective.
The death penalty is a topic many have yet to really decide on whether it should be banned or if they should keep it. It’s a touchy subject to many out there. No one really wants to be told that for the crime they have committed that they are going to get the death penalty. Choosing the death penalty is unjust in itself. If the state puts the death penalty in the same category of torture it could possibly reduce the human civilizations tolerance of cruelty. According to premises 1, Many people have a fear of death, you would think that this would make them not commit the crime knowing what the consequences could be which is an argument from common sense. Common sense tells us that people will automatically fear death more than a life sentence
Incarceration has not always been the main form of “punishment” when it comes to doing an injustice to society. In fact, in the early 1600’s common forms of punishments for doing wrong in society included social rejection, corporal punishment, forced labor etc. (“Prison History.”). It had not been until the 18th century where it had been determined that incarceration could actually be a form of punishment correlating with a set amount of time in which an individual had to serve dependent on the severity of his actions. The logic behind incarceration is to restrict a person of his liberty as retribution for the crime he has committed (Prison History.”) Prisons that were created in the 18th century gained their recognition because of their high goals in perfecting society. But, the truth is as people were focusing on perfecting society prisons soon became overcrowded, dirty, and most of all dangerous. By the late 19th century many more people had become aware of the poor prison conditions which had led to a “reformatory” movement. The reformatory movement was put into place as a means of rehabilitation for inmates (“Prison History.”) Prisons would now offer programs to reform inmates into model citizens by offering counseling, education, and opportunities to gain skills needed for working in a civilian world. However, with the growing amount of inmates each year prisons are still becoming overcrowded. Because prisons are so overcrowded there are not enough resources being spent on achieving the rehabilitation of inmates and reintegrating them into society in order for them to survive in the civilian world once released from prison (“Prison History.”)
Thesis: We should keep Capital Punishment because it shows that murder or rape is a serious crime and that the United States doesn’t take that matter softly.
According to UNICEF, corporal punishment is seen as an act of violence and the wrong way to discipline a child. Sweden was the first country to ban corporal punishment of children over thirty years ago and as a result persuaded other countries to follow suit (Romare, 2014). However it is legal in twenty- two states, although the US hasn’t ban the act, social acceptance has decreased.
they are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it