Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of literature on society
Study of poetry analysis
Influence of literature on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
An excerpt from the book A Single Shard written by Linda Sue Park follows the story of Tree-ear and his favorite potter, Min, and a poem named “Turn, Turn, My Wheel” by author Henry Wadsworth Longfellow follow a similar idea. That idea being that potters, are magical and artistic people, and their work is amazing. Both texts support this idea, usually by describing the end product, or the process of making pots. However, these texts are still different from each other in different ways. Briefly, the two passages “Turn, Turn My Wheel” and “A Single Shard” have many similar ideas, about the writer’s opinion of the author. But, there were many things different as well. Upon reading the two texts, the reader will stumble upon some things
that both texts, by comparison, are very similar. One similar idea that both texts share, is the fact that making pots using a potter’s wheel is a fascinating process. A Single Shard supports this idea because the text states “Tree-ear watches the miracle.” This text occurs when Tree-ear sneaks up on his favorite potter Min and watches him make a new pot. This text shows that the process of pottery, and using a potter’s wheel must be so satisfying, that the author refers to the process as a “miracle.” The poem “Turn, Turn My Wheel” supports this idea because it states “And while he plied his magic art- for it was magical to me.” The “magical” art the speaker is referring to, is the ability to make pots, meaning they find pottery and making pots “magical”. Another thing they have in common is that they both talk about how metaphorically “obedient” and moldable clay is. The excerpt A Single Shard does this by including “In only a few moments the clay rose and fell, grew taller, then rounded down, until it curved into perfect symmetry.” This text proves that since the clay is so moldable, people can shape however they want. “Turn Turn My Wheel” also does this by including the text “This clay, well mixed with marl and sand, Follows the motion of my hand;” This text shows that the clay was moldable enough, it will follow the hand of the potter. In other words, these two texts have characteristics that match each other.
Comparing Ben Bertram’s [Response] and Kogawa’s Road Building by Pick Axe is an interesting exercise. There are two primary points of comparison : First, why did each author choose to use the form of poetry that they did, haiku for Bertram and blank verse for Kogawa; Secondly, what using that form of poetry accomplished for their poem. The reason that these poems should be read together is because Bertram raises several important questions about Kogawa’s writing that will help you to better understand Kogawa’s message.
...ce, although both writings are interesting in their own ways, the most interesting aspect of both writings together is that they both have a similar plot and theme. It is rare that two
Obviously, Robert Browning’s two texts, Duchess, and Porphyria’s Lover can be compared and contrasted. They can be similar because speakers in the texts killed their women, they both had mental issues, and they were both jealous for one reason or another. Also, the speakers in the texts were different because the speaker in Duchess wanted to replace his wife, while the speaker in Lover didn’t. The Speaker in Duchess was also very rich, and the speaker in Lover was not. Lastly, the speaker in Duchess committed premeditative murder, while the speaker in Lover just murdered his girl.
Tales change with every teller. Features may be added or subtracted, stories may be broken apart or combined. Often the story-teller will adapt the tale for his own purposes to emphasize some theme of his own. C. S. Lewis uses and modifies older sources in many ways in his novel That Hideous Strength, incorporating themes and portions of Arthurian literature to add color and emphasize the subjects of his plot.
There are many wonderful well written poems from the 1900’s but two poems that stand out are “Ballad of Birmingham” by Dudley Randall and “The Writer” by Richard Wilbur. These poems introduce a whole new level to parenthood and dealing with their child’s desire to do something. The poems are very similar in the way the poets use poetic devices. The tones develop and change throughout the poems in a way that make the audience feel they are riding a rollercoaster. Also, the amount of imagery that consists in the poems makes the audience see, feel, and emotional feel what the poets are trying to get across. While reading and analyzing “Ballad of Birmingham” and “The Writer” the reader will feel a sense of many similarities that reveal the poems were written by superb poets.
Perhaps one might wonder which author did a better job in doing so, but with
...d. Through the differences and similarities, both stories hold as much importance for the people of today as they did for the people who wrote lived during that time.
In Raymond Carver's 'The Bath' and rewritten version of the story entitled 'A Small, Good Thing', the author tells the same tale in different ways, and to different ends, creating variegated experiences for the reader. Both stories have the same central plot and a majority of details remain the same, but the effects that the stories have upon the reader is significantly different. The greatest character difference is found in the role of the Baker, and his interaction with the other characters. The sparse details, language and sentence structure of 'The Bath' provide a sharp contrast emotionally and artistically to 'A Small Good Thing'. In many ways, 'The Bath' proves to have a more emotional impact because of all that it doesn't say; it's sparse, minimalist storytelling gives the impression of numbed shock and muted reactions. The descriptive storytelling of 'A Small Good Thing' goes deeper into the development of the characters and although it tells more story, it ends on a note of hopefulness, instead of fear or desperation. Each story has it's own magic that weave it's a powerful. When compared to each other the true masterpiece of each story is best revealed.
There are certain feelings that persuade writers to do what they do best. Of course, that feeling could be something different for each author, such as love, loss, peace, hatred, etc. The examination of these feelings is what makes an author’s work a piece of art and at the same time something humanly conceivable (since a majority of the time art is neither humanly conceivable nor understandable to those who merely observe it). And so when a writer decides to let these emotions that they have once felt, that perhaps they have felt for others, be translated into something perfectly tangible and comprehensible, an understanding is born between them and those they preach to. In John Gardner’s Grendel, Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre and Joseph
Burton makes several significant moves that modify the basics of Irving’s tale, frequently at the cost of the folk elements of Irving’s version. The frame narrative of Irving’s story—the tale, part of a series titled “The Sketch Book,” begins with the preface “Found among the papers of the Late Diedrich Knickerbocker—is completely done away with (Irving 41). What is more, t...
“Compare the ways in which the authors of the two texts convey ideas about art through their central characters?
uniquely significant in the short story, “Spunk” and the text, “M. Butterfly.” An examination of
“If literature truly possesses a mysterious power, I think perhaps it is precisely this: that one can read a book by a writer of a different time, a different language, and a different culture and there encounter a sensation that is one’s very own” (Hua 61). This quote said by Yu Hua speaks volumes about his feelings for reading and writing. There were many times in the novel that he suddenly remembered a feeling by writing it. There were also times when the reader experienced an emotion that was completely his or her own by reading the words he put on paper. Hua presents the reader with several stories from his early childhood in which he learned to read and write. From an early age he learned that words have meaning and the power to change a person’s life, for better or for worse, and although he did not have the best conditions to become a writer growing up, he still managed to make a name for himself with what he was dealt in life. Although Yu Hua had limited literature to read, he still managed to fall in love with reading.
In both pieces, the writers had a clear point they wanted to get across and used their styles to help convey their thoughts. They used facts and stories to help the reader see things from a different perspective, which allowed the reader to open up their mind to these topics. Both writers were very good at getting the reader to examine the topic from a fresh perspective and ultimately inform the reader to a new way of thinking. Whether they used facts and statistics or symbolisms and metaphors, both writers were able to get the reader to understand where they were coming from and assist the reader in finding the message in the text. By examining the similarities in writing we see that there is a common goal between the authors and now have a better understanding on why they chose the style they did and how it was
Unlike her brother, Dorothy seems to be less solitary in her experiences, her accounts of what happened and who was with her are less personal than William’s. Dorothy tends to include everyone who surrounded her at that point and time – ‘We [Dorothy and her brother William] were in the woods beyond Gowbarrow park’ – whereas William makes it a companionless experience, he forgets everyone that may have been sharing the moment with him – ‘I wandered lonely as a Cloud’ . This, in conjunction with the use of imagery, similes and personification, not only makes William’s poems more accessible to a wide range of readers but it also adds character and personality, whereas Dorothy’s journal tends to be more reserved and closed to interpretation. Although both use semantic field of nature, William’s use is more affective as it conveys emotion, passion and attachment to his work.