Comparing The Tempest And Indian Place-Names

876 Words2 Pages

In the poem, “Indian Place-Names” by Duncan Campbell Scott, and the drama, “The Tempest” by William Shakespeare, both authors depict the images of people who originally inhabit the locations of setting: in “Indian Place-Names” Scott shows the audiences about the indigenous Indian people of Canada, whereas Shakespeare illustrates the character of Caliban, who is one of the original residents of the island. In this essay, I will examine the authors’ characterizations towards the indigenous people in the poem, as well as Caliban in the drama, and explore the similarity and differences of the characterizations between two texts. Both texts similarly describe the relationship between the residents and their residences as that they are the dwellers of …show more content…

Upon Prospero’s arrival, he teaches Caliban language as to make this “savage” more civilized and obedient, however, Caliban uses the language he has learned to “curse” his master and refuse to accept the commands from Prospero, showing his rebellion. Moreover, even though Caliban is under the punishment of “apes that mow and chatter” and “hedgehogs which lie tumbling in [his] barefoot”, which significantly shows that he is far less powerful than Prospero, he is still uncompromised: he is very eager to conduct his “revenge” and “bite [Prospero] to death” because, at his first encounter with Stephano and Trinculo, Caliban immediately suggests that. Though Caliban’s attempt to “destroy [Prospero]” ends up in failure, this endeavor is rebellious. And Caliban’s rebellion against the oppression from “tyrant” reveals his nobility that he is courageous to fight against Prospero, even though Prospero is much more powerful than him. This rebellious and uncompromising character of Caliban in The Tempest sharply differs from the “waned and left” indigenous people in Indian

Open Document