Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The case against monarchy
The case against monarchy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The case against monarchy
Some of these monarchies are still around today, while the others haven’t been around for a long time. The remote time base was 1701, which was the establishment of the kingdom of Prussia. Where the most recent is 1870, when then the 2nd French Empire under Napoleon III collapsed.
The Spain, France, and English monarchies are very similar and active.Where on the other hand Prussia dissolved in 1947. The New Monarchy of Spain began with the marriage of King Ferdinand of Aragon and Queen Isabella of Castile in 1469. Whereas the New France Monarchy to end of the Hundred Years’ War in 1453. The New Monarchy of England started with the Tudor Dynasty, where first king, Henry VII gained the throne in 1485, by defeating the House of York in
The palace of Versailles was built by King Louis XIV of France and the Escorial was built by King Philip II of Spain. The two kings each had their differences about their beliefs on how to rule, yet there are some similarities. Louis XIV believed in showing off his power and being open. Philip II was a simplistic guy devoted to Catholicism. They both had military to spread their beliefs and ideas. Despite the kings’ beliefs, their palaces reflected their ideals.
In the 1400’s European countries had been thrusted into overseas expansion in the fever for land and gold. All throughout Europe, monarchies had sent explorers all over the world to conquer land for their country. Each country had conquered and colonized in various styles, but each had a specific goal that they wanted to achieve. During the European colonization of the Americas or the New World, both the Spanish and the French spread the idea of Catholicism throughout the Americas, however the Spanish believed in treating the Native Americans in a harsher way by enslaving them for labor whereas the French established trade relationships.
Many people have heard of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain. However, only some know of all the things they accomplished. They might be best known for funding the voyages of Christopher Columbus, but they also greatly contributed to the unity of Spain (“Isabella l”). Together, they brought many kingdoms on the Iberian Peninsula together to form what Spain is today. Through Spain’s unification, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella strengthened Spain into an economic and dominant world power, enabling the spread of Christianity and the colonization of a New World.
According to the text book, an absolute monarch is a king or queen who has unlimited power and seeks to control all aspects of society (McDougall little, 1045). In more simple terms, it is a ruler who can do just about anything without having to get permission from anyone, or having to worry about the repercussions. This was a trend that started in the 1600’s by European leaders who were rich, and didn’t like to be told what to do. These conflicts arose with the States-General in France, or Parliament in England who had substantial control. The first countries to have absolute rulers were the traditionally strong countries, such as England, Spain, and of course Louis XIV’s France.
Spanish history starts with the marriage of Isabella, queen of Castile, and Ferdinand, king of Aragon, in 1469. With this marriage, the two counties became one, but neither one could control the others possessions without the other person’s writing consent, which was true of all marriages under Spanish law
In the late fifteenth century, rulers started to solidify their nations by creating a more nationalistic view in each kingdom’s inhabitance. Through political and economic stability people were ruled by a more centralized government and felt more national pride. Unlike in the past when lands were constantly changing rulers and mercenary soldiers fought for the highest bidder. Monarch’s such as Louis XI of France, Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain and Henry VII of England helped to unite their kingdom’s and contribute to the phrase “new monarchies”.
Towards the end of the sixteenth century, the Thirty Years War was coming to an end. The Thirty Years War was one of the longest and most destructive conflicts, as well as the deadliest European religious war, in history. Ending with the Peace of Westphalia, the war resulted in an end to religious warfare. It also, unintentionally, gave rise to a new type of monarch. The New Monarch worked to unify their nations and create stable and centralized governments. New Monarchs such as Louis XIV, Peter the Great, and Ferdinand III were known for creating a more centralized government. Centralization was the concentration of authority on a single source and was necessary for magisterial absolutism. A monarch was an absolute monarch when they had absolute
Spanish America as well as multiple other kingdoms. The death of Ferdinand II opened the door for Charles V to become King Carlos I of Spain in 1516. In 1519 when Maximilian I died, Charles V was left with the Hapsburg domains and was elected Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor (11). With all of the nations he inherited combined, his domain was estimated at four millio...
3. The French and Spanish colonies were both established for different reasons. The French colonies were established as trading posts. Most of the population of the French colonies were merchants, fur traders, and missionaries. Later French colonies followed in the path of trading posts as well. The Spanish colonies were established because of the conquests Spain underwent. They would go out and claim and take over land on their conquests, and that would expand their empire. Most of the southwest and southern regions were claimed by Spain. Spain's population was mostly missionaries, conquistadors, and soldiers.
The Succession War, as it came to be called, started due to the efforts of the Castilians to prevent Prince Henry's daughter, Juana, from ascending to the throne and in her place set Isabella (Parry, 134). Four years of brutal fighting took...
The Tudor Monarchy is one of the most well known monarchies of English history. It is so well known primarily due to Henry VIII, all of his wives, and his desire for a male heir to the throne of England. Because of Henry VIII, England received one of its best monarchs, Queen Elizabeth. There were a great number of obstacles and unfortunate events that Elizabeth went through as a result of her parents. Although Queen Elizabeth I faced many difficulties, including both coming to the throne and during her reign, she was a great ruler with many successes that changed the course of England and its history.
King of Spain, only son of the Emperor Charles V, and Isabella of Portugal, b. at Valladolid, 21 May, 1527; d. at the Escorial, 13 Sept., 1598. He was carefully educated in the sciences, learned French and Latin, though he never spoke anything but Castilian, and also showed much interest in architecture and music. In 1543 he married his cousin, Maria of: Portugal, who died at the birth of Don Carlos (1535). He was appointed regent of Spain with a council by Charles V. In 1554 he married Mary Tudor, Queen of England, who was eleven years his senior. This political marriage gave Spain an indirect influence on affairs of England, recently restored to Catholicism; but in 1555 Philip was summoned to the Low Countries, and Mary's death in the same year severed the connection between the two countries. At a solemn conference held at Brussels, 22 Oct., 1555, Charles V ceded to Philip the Low Countries, the crowns of Castille, Aragon, and Sicily, on 16 Jan., 1556, and the countship of Burgundy on the tenth of June. He even thought of securing for him the imperial crown, but the opposition of his brother Ferdinand caused him to abandon that project. Having become king, Philip, devoted to Catholicism, defended the Faith throughout the world and opposed the progress of heresy, and these two things are the key to his whole reign. He did both by means of absolutism. His reign began unpleasantly for a Catholic sovereign. He had signed with France the Treaty of Vaucelles (5 Feb., 1556), but it was soon broken by France, which joined Paul IV against him. Like Julius II this pope longed to drive the foreigners out of Italy. Philip had two wars on his hands at the same time, in Italy and in the Low Countries. In Italy the Duke of Alva, Viceroy of Naples, defeated the Duke of Guise and reduced the pope to such distress that he was forced to make peace. Philip granted this on the most favourable terms and the Duke of Alva was even obliged to ask the pope's pardon for having invaded the Pontifical States. In the Low Countries Philip defeated the French at Saint Quentin (1557) and Gravelines (1558) and afterwards signed the Peace of Cateau-Cambresis (3 April, 1559), which was sealed by his marriage with Elizabeth of Valois, daughter of Henry II.
An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty
The House of Tudor was founded by Henry VII in 1485. Known for its notorious reign from Henry VIII, the Tudor dynasty began from an uneven stance in 1485 after the Battle of Bosworth. This resulted is the many uncertainties and the disadvantages of Henry’s position as the king of England
Ever since the fall of 1930 when the Spanish Revolution began there has been no surcease of the struggle in Spain. For a long time there was a deadlock of forces, an equilibrium in the tug of war between the property holders and the destitute. Now the equilibrium is being definitely broken. The issue before Spain is either Communism or Fascism. The matter is being fought out not with ballots but with bullets and ruthless civil war. Slowly the political revolution is being definitively turned into a social revolution.