Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Merits and demerits of reality shows
Gender role in popular culture
Merits and demerits of reality shows
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Merits and demerits of reality shows
Comparing The Real World and Survivor
While MTV's The Real World places twenty-somethings in unique arrangements in which to live as they would like for several months, CBS's Survivor elicits peculiar behavior from contestants living in unusual circumstances. Despite fundamental differences, the continued success of both The Real World[1] and Survivor[2] illustrates that American viewers love to watch reality television shows with interesting locales, competitions or tasks, and natural personal relations.
In contrast to shows with static settings, The Real World and Survivor have perennially situated their casts in (varied) fascinating locations. The opportunity for viewers to vicariously experience unfamiliar milieus has proven an enticing element upon which both shows have consistently relied and improved. In the midst of a programming lineup dominated by sub/urban shows, CBS debuted Survivor in May of 2000 with the aim of replicating the 1997 success of Sweden?s Expedition Robinson (named after Robinson Crusoe)[3] . Instead of presenting viewers with Hollywood?s America, the first Survivor took place on the island of Puala Tiga in the South China Sea, though the location was not initially disclosed. Part of Survivor?s initial appeal was undoubtedly its exotic yet real setting that substantially differed from all viewers? surroundings. Survivor?s featuring American participants, not characters, with whom audiences can identify creates a vicarious viewing experience: unlike documentary programs on Discovery Channel or Travel Channel that showcase locales in their natural states, Americans? presence eliminates the socio-geographic isolation of foreign environments. Likely capitalizing on Amer...
... middle of paper ...
...port,? as this is a prominent part of the series. Amidst the myriad of promiscuity that occurs every season, many cast members (temporarily) pair off, including Rachel and Puck (San Francisco), Amaya and Colin (Hawaii), and Irulan and Alton (Las Vegas), who stayed together after the season ended.
Clearly the producers of The Real World and Survivor have refined both shows to tailor to audiences? interests; Viacom, owner of both MTV and CBS, has thoroughly invested in the commodity of voyeurism, as both long-running shows have been renewed.
[1] Any secondary information from http://www.mtv.com/onair/realworld unless otherwise noted.
[2] http://www.epguides.com/survivor/ served as my primary source of information.
[3] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/1346936.stm
[4] Specific house locations from http://www.realworldhouses.com/
If T.V. news or radio have morphed into reality shows, then it is only a reflection of the viewers. As a former news reporter, the author should understand that the success
TV shows like Survivor and The Amazing Race are just a few game shows that are different than the average sitcom on today. As soon as the people on these game shows begin to mention their beliefs and how they impact their lives, Murray describes the producers as being “afraid to push too far whenever the people in front of the cameras start mentioning God or values.” The producers are careful to not reveal too many of their beliefs, because it “would get in the way of the game.” Real life connections and beliefs should be present because TV viewers can relate. They have meaning, unlike fake, scripted shows that hid the reality of the real
Reality shows sent a much-needed lifeline to the television networks industry. These shows have found a new way to bring much needed viewers, and even more important they brought in much needed money. The money came rolling into CBS after premiering Survivor, which brought in a profit of around $30,000,000 to the network. Even though Survivor is the must costly reality show, costing close to one million dollars to produce and hour of programming. In comparison to other shows, which cost far more like CBS’s series “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation” which cost over 1.6 million to produce per hour. With the amount of money coming in such large sums to networks have had to close monitor how much is being spent. Clearly’ the reality shows have brought in much needed assets to the flattering television networks.
Do you know the guiltiest pleasure of the American public? Two simple words reveal all—reality TV. This new segment of the TV industry began with pioneering shows like MTV’s The Real World and CBS’s Survivor. Switch on primetime television nowadays, and you will become bombarded by and addicted to numerous shows all based on “real” life. There are the heartwarming tales of childbirth on TLC, melodramas of second-rate celebrities on Celebrity Mole, and a look into a completely dysfunctional family on The Osbornes. Yet, out of all these entertaining reality shows arises the newest low for popular culture, a program based on the idea of a rich man or woman in search of the perfect marriage partner. The Bachelor, and its spin-off The Bachelorette, exemplify capitalist ideology founded on the Marxist base-superstructure model and establish the role of an active American audience.
In 2000, three simple words encircling a tiki torch and palm tree defined not only a television series, but a whole new culture of entertainment: outwit, outplay, outlast. When the competitive reality show Survivor first hit the air, producers Mark Burnett and Jeff Probst left sixteen Americans stranded on a tropical island, hoping only for nature to take its course and drama to ensue. No one could have predicted the phenomenon that would be a catalyst not only for reality TV, but competitive game shows set on putting people in their most vulnerable state. Now that ten years have passed, many people have begun to quickly dismiss Survivor as the Destroyer of Thoughtful Television: a show focused only on scheming, conniving, and eating bugs, all for the sake for winning one million dollars. Going even further, intellectuals argue that shows like Survivor encourage blatant discrimination, racism, sexism, and ageism - after all, the idea of the show is to form social cliques (dubbed "alliances") and vote people both out of the game and off the island, sometimes for no reason other than not “liking” them. Not to mention the fact that it always seems to magically start pouring rain the moment two people are left standing on a ten-foot pole above the Atlantic Ocean in the final challenge, introducing the controversial concept of whether or not reality TV is real at all, but merely a contrived series of events captured by a camera.
Out of all the industrialized countries in the world, the United States is the only one that doesn’t have a universal health care plan (Yamin 1157). The current health care system in the United States relies on employer-sponsored insurance programs or purchase of individual insurance plans. Employer-sponsored coverage has dropped from roughly 80 percent in 1982 to a little over 60 percent in 2006 (Kinney 809). The government does provide...
1. Sterling, Bruce. "Major Science Fiction Themes:utopias and Dystopias." Encyclopedia - Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Web. 15 Feb. 2011. .
After the Battle of Plussey in 1757, Britain gained a much control over India. The British East India Company exercised power in this region instead of the Queen of England. The Company brought British soldiers and missionaries to the foreign land. The military in India was comprised of European troops and Indian troops resulting in a variety of weapons present. The weapons of the English people were a lot more different than those of the Indian people. The Europeans were the officers in this military and the Indians were common soldiers. The Indian Soldiers were known as the Sepoys. There were various events before the actual revolution that were significant to the cause of the Sepoy Revolution. In 1806, the introduction of new clothing/appearance regulations sparked a minor rebellion, but this was easily controlled and suppressed by the British. In 1856, the East India Company anne...
It is no secret that reality television shows often present contrived situations as reality. Many producers claim that there are no scripts used in the production of reality shows. They maintain that nothing in the lives of the participants is planned purely for viewers’ entertainment, and that what is presented in the show is their actual reality. However, most people know this to be untrue to a certain degree. The events and situations in reality shows are often staged, re-enacted, or cleverly edited to make them appear more dramatic, thereby more interesting, than they are. Elizabeth Larkin writes, “After so many “reality” programs, we can discern a pattern of “characters” that isn’t very far different from the stock characters found in fictional programming. There’s the sweet and naive person from a small town looking to make it big while still retaining small town values. There’s the party girl/guy who’s always looking for a good time and who shocks those around them—and the list goes on” (Larkin 290). Participants in reality television shows are often looking to gain wealth and fame, and they are willing to do anything necessary to achieve that.
Agriculture is the most fundamental resource of society. Without it, humans could not live, especially in the ways we do now where people reside in cities. This means that those cities could not exist without large scale agriculture to sustain them. Since agriculture is such a necessity, people have developed methods to gain more from their land. One of the many solutions besides machinery they have developed to produce higher crop yields is through the use of pesticides. However, those pesticides which have resulted in high crop yields have come at price, and that is human health itself. This seems rather contradictory. Pesticides were designed to help people and society by increased the success of producing high crop yields, and they still do that, but at the same time, those same pesticides have caused unforeseen health risks, primarily to those have had to handle them. The average person would not consider pesticides as being a cause for depression, or in worst case scenario, suicide, but studies have found significant links. Even though California is just one place in the world, it has large agricultural areas which were, and still are, represented in many scientific studies that have found those unforeseen risks from pesticide use. Since pesticides are poisons, producers and safety activities urge several safety precautions to attempt to reduce the effect on human users. However, these precautions sometimes do not prevent long term damages in the people that live and work in such close proximity, which are the agricultural workers. Since the risk are known, policies have been put into place, but despite that, the use of pesticides remains high. Like many of the anthropological readings from this course, there are also added ...
The meaning of reality TV in American culture can differ from person to person. Overall, the purpose of reality TV is to provide entertainment, to keep viewers on the edge of their seats. At the end of every episode, the producers show a sneak preview of things that will take place in the next episode, which leaves the audience with a cliffhanger. In the sneak preview, the producers show a conflict that may arise, in hopes that the audience will continue to watch the show. After watching the sneak preview, the viewers develop a sense of anticipation and want to know what’s going to happen next. Reality TV is broken down into certain categories such as competition, entertainment, ect. In this essay, I’m going to be discussing The Amazing Race by using both a narrative and visual analysis.
...ortation of plants, fruits, vegetables, and animals. Indiscriminate pesticide use kills the good with the bad. Long term and wide spread pesticide use poisons underground water sources, which, in turn, poison plants, animals, and humans. And, finally, by our uninformed actions, new super races of pests continue to evolve and create even greater dangers than the original.
The advancement in chemical technology with these improved pesticides has created improvements in the public health as well. From this, perhaps, we have become careless in our use and control of them. While there are many positive points, there are also extreme risks involved in using th...
As time has progressed, there has always been an overarching need for high amounts of crop production throughout the world. With the rapid rate of population growth, the need for crops and other sources of nutrients is only increasing. In order to meet these high demands and increase yields, farmers and other agriculturalists have started implementing the use of pesticides. These chemical mixtures are being used in order to prevent, destroy, repel or mitigate any pests from destroying growing crops. However, using pesticides on crops can create massive amounts of pollution, negatively affect an individual’s health, and can spark biodiversity loss within an ecosystem. According to Michael C.R. Alavanja, “Over 1 billion pounds of pesticides are used within the United States (US) each year and approximately 5.6 billion pounds are used worldwide”. With all this in mind, it is clear that pesticides should not be made available to farmers and agriculturalists, and should
Many pesticides, that of which have many unanswered questions regarding the potential health risk have been authorized by the EPA Office of Pesticide ...