Comparing The Power And Blood Meridian

3198 Words7 Pages

Philosopher Thomas Hobbes proposes a key fundamental concept that ‘humanity is innately predisposed to exhorting power and influence on their environment as much as possible.’ Both ‘Blood Meridian’ by Cormac McCarthy and ‘The Power’ by Naomi Alderman present narratives with a twisted nihilistic perspective by holding the view that to fulfil this innate drive for power, the only way to do so is through violence which ends up being nothing but self-serving, that leads to the total destruction of their environment and themselves. Both McCarthy and Alderman present the structure of these novels by unveiling this violence through the disintegration of the characters’ moral compasses, which causes this violent unconscious to corrode with the societal …show more content…

His lack of ability to ‘read or write’ could be interpreted as his rejection of semantics and the Bible, which establishes the moral and spiritual ignorance he had at the beginning of the book. In the period in which the book is set in around 1850, religion was often regarded as a component of societal expectations. By employing the kid’s immediate rejection of these values and principles and resorting to violence. This could be evaluated as a critique of religion, as it illustrates how easy it is to stray from it. Consequently, due to this spiritual and moral ignorance, he must seek guidance within himself. This internal drive and ambition may lead him to assert violence over his environment as much as possible. Critic Steven Shario proposes that the entire novel makes clear that the human world always has, and will be a world of killing.” This is reinforced further through examples such as McCarthy’s linguistic use of the ‘Kid’ which is starkly contrasted to …show more content…

Alderman and McCarthy deploy a cyclical narrative to display how the violence ultimately becomes self-destructive. ‘Blood Meridian’ Deploys this when presenting how The Judge serves as an extended metaphor for ultimate violence and power after murdering The Kid. He is described as, “Dancing in light and shadow, he is a great favourite. He never sleeps, Judge. He is dancing, he says that he will never die.’ We ultimately see this final reminder from McCarthy that evil exists everywhere, by creating the contrasts of light and darkness between where the Judge dances, he may be showing to the reader that this violence is ultimately inescapable and lies within us all. As McCarthy is known to implement a lot of religious imagery within his books, this could potentially be seen throughout the Judge's character, by stating that his presence is everywhere, this may be reflective of God’s omnipresent characteristics. By having the Judge serve as a direct antithesis to God, this may only emphasise his destructiveness. We see further emphasis on power and control through the nature of his ‘dancing and dancing.’ Critics often interpret dancing as a metaphor for warfare; in previous chapters, the Judge describes the idea of a dance to The Kid to be ritualistic and of strictly ordered activity in which everyone has a specific role to play.

Open Document