Comparing The Open Boat And To Build A Fire

451 Words1 Page

Both Stephen Crane's "The Open Boat" and Jack London's "To Build a Fire" dive into the naturalistic theme of characters confronting extreme circumstances beyond their control in hostile environments. In "The Open Boat," four men find themselves stranded at sea after their ship sinks, battling against the merciless sea. Similarly, in "To Build a Fire," a lone traveler navigates the unforgiving Yukon wilderness in sub-zero temperatures, facing the relentless power of nature. In both stories, the protagonists' interactions with their surroundings highlight the insignificance of human action against overwhelming forces. In "The Open Boat," the men row tirelessly, trying to reach safety, but they are at the mercy of the indifferent sea. Crane portrays nature as indifferent …show more content…

It seemed to drink the tiny boat and, at the same time, threw the men into the sea.” (London, 77) This discusses the immense condition of the setting that the men are enduring as the author uses the word, “Huge, Angry, and Merciless” to describe the condition of the sea. The author's use of these harsh words enhances the setting and the naturalistic style that the story is presented in. Furthermore, both stories reflect the Naturalistic critique of control by illustrating how characters are victims of forces beyond their control. "The Open Boat," differs from London’s story for the fact that multiple characters are going through this struggle together compared to being alone. The man in “To Build a Fire,” must endure the cold and extreme temperatures alone without having anyone else around. “He remembered the advice of the old man on Sulphur Creek and smiled. The man was very serious when he said that no man should travel alone in that country after 50 below zero. Well, here he was; he had had the accident; he was alone.” (London, 72) The solitary the man encounters throughout his journey intensifies the isolation and vulnerability of his

Open Document