Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And Lord Of The Flies

423 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Lord of the Flies violence in the novel

Do you know of someone who is violent or hunts? Lord of The Flies deals with teenager who were in a plane crash and now are stranded on an island, trying to get rescued. “The Most Dangerous Game” is about this guy who grows up hunting then finally modifies his hunting style to killing people instead of animals. Jack and General Zaroff both symbolize violence in Lord of the Flies and “ The Most Dangerous Game” by Jack ends up killing Piggy and Simon, General Zaroff goes hunting and kills people, and Jack throws his spear at Ralph.


In Lord of the Flies, Jack ends up killing Piggy and Simon. “He came- disguised. He may come again even though we gave him the head of our kill to eat. So watch; and be careful.” (pg. 160) This shows that Jack killed Simon. They thought Simon was the beast in this story. In that statement, Jack was talking about the beast. Killing people is a symbol of violence. Jack going out and killing the beast, which was Simon, shows the symbol of violence. …show more content…

In the book, General Zaroff says, “Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting.” In the book. Rainsford says, “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder.” This shows that General Zaroff kills people instead of animals. General Zaroff starts telling Rainsford about his hunting and what he does. General Zaroff doesn’t think it is murder, he thinks it’s hunting. Rainsford calls him out on the murder and tells him that is what it actually is. When General Zaroff goes out and hunts people and kills them it symbolizes

Show More
Related

  • Rainsford's Greed Quotes

    598 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rainsford is known for his extravagant hunting skills, even General Zaroff speaks of Rainsford as is if he has inspired him to become a hunter. Rainsford talks about hunting with passion, while he is speaking to Whitney he tells her it’s “the best sport in the world” (19). Rainsford has no guilt when he kills animals, he even tells Whitney that it’s nonsense when she mention the jaguars have feeling. But Rainsford shows immediate disgust when Zaroff brings up his hunting of humans, “hunting, great heavens, what you speak of is murder” (26). This only the first of many times that he reacts with great displeasure.

    Read More

  • Essay on Behavior in All Quiet on the Western Front and Lord of the Flies

    1312 Words  | 3 Pages

    Golding's Lord of the Flies is highly demonstrative of Golding's opinion that society is a thin and fragile veil that when removed shows man for what he truly is, a savage animal. Perhaps the best demonstration of this given by Golding is Jack's progression to the killing of the sow. Upon first landing on the island Jack, Ralph, and Simon go to survey their new home. Along the way the boys have their first encounter with the island's pigs. They see a piglet caught in some of the plants. Quickly Jack draws his knife so as to kill the piglet. Instead of completing the act, however, Jack hesitates. Golding states that, "The pause was only long enough for them to realize the enormity of what the downward stroke would be." Golding is suggesting that the societal taboos placed on killing are still ingrained within Jack. The next significant encounter in Jack's progression is his first killing of a pig. There is a description of a great celebration. The boys chant "Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood." It is clear from Golding's description of the revelry that followed the killing that the act of the hunt provided the boys with more than food. The action of killing another living thing gives them pleasure. The last stage in Jack's metamorphosis is demonstrated by the murder of the sow. Golding describes the killing almost as a rape. He says, "Jack was on...

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Simon's 'Lord Of The Flies'

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    -I noticed that both leaders promised the boys “fun.” However, Jack’s idea of “fun” is somewhat evil, as it involves being savages and killing. Now, the Lord of the Flies says, “We are going to have fun on this island. Understand?” I think this may foreshadow Simon’s death, as Jack is the current leader, his idea of fun is killing, and the pig’s head is promising “fun” for Simon.

    Read More

  • Betrayal In Lord Of The Flies

    407 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Lord of the Flies, a group of boys are stranded on a deserted island. It starts out fine, until one of the boys, Jack, becomes jealous that he isn’t in charge. He forms a separate tribe. One night they start a war type of dance, chanting and screaming. They mistake Simon for the beast and kill him screaming “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” (Goulding 138) After the boys realize they had killed Simon, they realized that who else would give them hope that they could survive, and keep the peace around the island. After Simon died Jack started to gain more power, because Ralph had lost a valuable member of his

    Read More

  • 'The Lord of the Flies' - Savagery

    1359 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Lord of the Flies - Savagery. William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel, Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes. At the opening of the novel, Ralph and Jack get on extremely well.

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Character Analysis Essay

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    General Zaroff used hunting tactics when they were eating “the last supper” at Zaroff’s house. Every time Rainsford looked up, he said, “he found him studying him, appraising him narrowly” (Connell 66). By this, the reader can tell that Zaroff is trying to notice Rainsford’s tendencies. Knowing these can make hunting him easier. Also at dinner, Zaroff explains to Rainsford that “God made him a hunter” and how his father believed that “his hand was made for the trigger” since he was ten (Connell 85). Zaroff sharing this with Rainsford is proof that this man is a talented hunter and has been for a long time. Rainsford is quite the hunter himself. So much so, that Zaroff knew who he was when he arrived. The General stated, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home” (Connell 52). Also during the hunt when Rainsford set up the Burmese tiger pit and claiming one of Zaroff’s dogs, Zaroff tells him, “You’ve done well, Rainsford” (Connell 194). If his enemy believes that he is a great hunter, then he must be. Especially because Zaroff thinks so highly of himself. Going back to when Rainsford was

    Read More

  • A Comparison of The Destructors and Lord of the Flies

    2323 Words  | 5 Pages

    A Comparison of The Destructors and Lord of the Flies In Graham Greene's "The Destructors," the author presents the Wormsley Common car-park gang, a group of adolescent delinquents who commit petty crimes for fun. William Golding, in his novel Lord of the Flies, presents a slightly younger group of boys who are wrecked on an uninhabited island and develop a primitive society that eventually collapses and gives way to despotic savagery. Although these two cases seem rather different, the boys in both situations show common characteristics. They react to the outside environment of their worlds in similar ways.

    Read More

  • Inherent Evil of Man Exposed in Lord of the Flies

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through the story Simon acted as the Christ Figure. The death of Simon symbolized the loss of religious reasoning. As the boys killed Simon they had let out their savage urges and acted in a cannibalistic manor. Even after the death of Simon Jack and his tribe did not feel any penitence to what they had done, killing to them had become second nature.The circle became a horseshoe. A thing was crawling out of the forest. It came darkly, uncertainly. The shrill screaming that rose before the beast was like a pain. The beast stumbled into the horseshoe."Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!" (Golding 141).In this quote a figure had crawled out of the forest and the ring had opened to let it inside. Mistaken as the beast by the Jack's tribe, Simon was beaten to death. After the group disbanded for shelter from the storm. The storm subsided and the tides moved in and out, Simon's body was washed to sea. Here because of the storm, the darkness and fear the boys became hysterical. They acted savagely not knowing what they were doing. The boys did not take a second look to what their actions were. They had let their malicious urges control them. He cam-disguised. He may come again even though we gave him the head of our kill to eat. So watch; and be careful (Golding 148). Here Jack is warning his tribe about the beast. Not caring or taking any notice to what had taken place with Simon. Jack or his tribe does not feel any remorse for the murder they had committed, whether they realized that or not. To Jack and his tribe what they had done was a pretentious accomplishment. A death could go by their eyes blindly.

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game

    367 Words  | 1 Pages

    G. Zaroff is a cruel person because instead of hunting animals, he hunts humans and does not care for the value of life. He displays this quality when he tells Rainsford “I refuse to believe that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about value of human life. In this quote he shows his cruelness because he doesn’t care about humans but himself. He also doesn’t care for the value of human life.

    Read More

  • Jack's Savagery

    1034 Words  | 3 Pages

    The killing of Simon was the first major death that impacted the novel. They believed that what came running out of the woods was the beast and began to attack it relentlessly (not realizing that the beast was actually Simon). All of the boys, including Ralph and Piggy beat Simon because they think Simon is the beast and they fulfill the Lord of the Flies’ “Prophecy ” (Spitzer). All of the boys are overcome by their evil side. The killing of Simon represents the progression of savagery in the boys’ souls. It also reflects the darkness of mankind. “I wasn’t scared,” said Ralph slowly, ” I was – I don’t know what I was. ” When Ralph realizes that the beast that they killed the night before was actually Simon, he is filled with guilt and insists to Piggy that they have taken part in that murder. Piggy denies Ralph and pretends that he had nothing to do with the killing. Simon’s death clearly presents that evil does exist in man, but in a higher state. Golding again manages to convey his message clearly to the reader that evil does exist in man, but to a higher extent. The death of Piggy also reflects the evil side and darkness that resides in mankind.“The rock struck Piggy a glancing blow from chin to knee….The rock bounced twice and was lost in the forest. Piggy fell forty feet and landed on his back across that square, red rockin the sea. His head opened and stuff came out and turned red. Piggy’s arms and legs twitched a bit, like a pig’s after it has been killed” (Golding,222). Roger at this point has been fully taken over by the darkness in his soul, and doesn’t even think properly, which resulted in a murder of an innocent being. The evil side in their souls has controlled them and lead them to do something that is completely savage and cruel. Golding has succeeded in proving that evil is truly inherent in

    Read More

  • Understanding the Symbolism in Lord of the Flies

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    It tells Simon that he should not try to stop Jack’s new rule from gaining power, but alternatively to let the barbarity consume the island. How does the Lord of the Flies intend to stop Simon if he tries to spread his insight about the “beast” to the rest? Because the savagery is already within them, the boys who Simon would try to save, would not want to fathom the revelation. In short, even if Simon tried to tell the boys about the true meaning of the beast, they would not be ready to listen and would not

    Read More

  • What Are The Similarities Between Hitler And Lord Of The Flies

    469 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding describes Jack as someone who promotes unity, someone who is skilled at manipulating people, and someone who idolizes violent actions. Jack has a lot in common with the World War II German dictator, Adolf Hitler, who had also demonstrated desires for unity, the manipulation of others and increased violence. All these similarities between them led to them destroying their society.

    Read More

  • Comparison of The Lord of the Flies and The Man and The Boy In the Road

    1725 Words  | 4 Pages

    In both novels, the main characters are isolated from any form of true civilisation. In Lord of the Flies, the boys find themselves on a desolate island which is devoid of any human life due to a plane crash, whereas in The Road the Man and Boy live in a bleak, destroyed America in which almost the entire population has been wiped out due to an unnamed natural disaster. Because of the lack of resources and essentials, it is inevitable that the main characters have to find means of surviving – in Lord of the Flies; this is mainly through hunting and building shelter and in The Road, the Man and the Boy trek along the barren landscape in search for any remaining food they can find.

    Read More

  • Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis

    1958 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Lord of the Flies, which is a pig head attached to a stick sharpened at both ends is also known as the beast. The beast is a very important symbol that represents the savagery that is inside the boys, but they do not realize it. The boys follow their own instincts and believe that the beast is something that they can hunt down, although it's actually inside each of them, except no one apart from Simon realizes it. "But I tell you there isn't a beast. We've seen the beast with our own eyes. Fancy thinking that the beast was something you could hunt and kill! you knew it, didn't you? I'm a part of you." (pg 36, 108, 158). This relates to the theme because since there is no civilization, the boys have become so savage, that they cannot even realize that the beast is the savagery inside each of them. Jack himself is also an important symbol of savagery. Ever since Ralph becomes chief, Jack wants to replace him so that he can do what he wants without being stopped. Not only that, but his initial arrogance makes him want to have full control over the boys. At first, it seems like he's trying to make himself look superior or equal to Ralph. "I agree with Ralph, we've got to have rules and obey them. I thought I might kill. Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!" (pg 42, 51, 168). This

    Read More

  • Jack Merridew

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    Any individual may seem to be innocent and harmless, but in reality every living being has the capability to be evil. In the story Lord of the Flies by William Golding, some of the most innocent characters allow the evil half of their mind to control them. One example of evil on the island is when Roger murders Piggy in cold blood. This shows how he had progressed from throwing small stones around Henry to pushing a large boulder down a cliff, killing Piggy. Also, the entire group takes part in the murder of Simon, because they fear it is the beast. This brings up a new point about how anybody can access the evil part of their mind while in fear. Then, at the top of the food chain, there is Jack Merridew. Jack wants everything to do with violence

    Read More

More about Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And Lord Of The Flies

Open Document