Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parenting styles literature reviews
Parenting styles literature reviews
Summary about parenting styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parenting styles literature reviews
Authors demonstrate similar messages and themes throughout their writing, from poetry to personal memoirs. Similar parental qualities such as parenting styles also show through, as well as whether the author was raised via nature, nurture, or even willpower. Jeannette Walls’s The Glass Castle, and Sylvia Plath’s Daddy are two pieces of literature that demonstrate their similar relationships with their fathers, similar parenting styles, similar character development,
Throughout both authors’ writing, their strained relationship with their fathers is shown. In Plath’s poem, her father’s oppressive nature becomes evident even in the first stanza: “Black shoe, in which I have lived like a foot” (1). Here, she is speaking metaphorically, calling her father a black shoe, and describing herself as the foot within it. Furthermore, her usage of the adjective “black” to describe the shoe creates a tone that the reader can infer has a negative connotation. Rather than create a positive image of comfort and protection, the specific word choice of “black shoe” clues the reader in on the oppressive nature of her
…show more content…
father. Similarly, Jeannette Walls’s father, Rex, displays the same qualities: “He did it again and again, until the realization that he was rescuing me only to throw me back into the water took hold” (66). An unusual method, Rex was teaching Jeannette how to swim by “drowning” her until she figured out how to. Most parents would choose less extreme methods to achieve the same result, yet Rex’s misguided and oppressive characteristics cause him to act this way. Both of these writers’ fathers exhibited similar parenting styles, namely, Authoritarian. Authoritarian parents are defined as demanding, unresponsive to child’s needs, gives no choices to child, and reserved in warmth and nurture. Jeannette and Sylvia’s fathers both demonstrated these qualities, such as when Rex didn’t want to let Jeannette leave home for New York. Plath also alludes to her father’s commanding and controlling nature many times, describing him as Hitler and herself a Jew. That strong metaphor lends itself to the sheer amount of oppression she experienced under her father’s authority. Furthermore, each daughter was raised through a different method (nature, nurture, or willpower). Jeannette most prevalently displays willpower; as a young girl, she mimics her father’s adventurous nature, but slowly realizes that her father is not as perfect as she thought. She moves to New York, and starts her own life relatively separate from her father’s. Plath, on the other hand, was raised moreso through nature. Her writings about the constricting, oppressive man that is her father suggest that she may exhibit the same plaguing qualities. Ultimately, Plath commits suicide after two unsuccessful attempts, most likely due to how oppressively she was raised. Her dad’s nature of near-abuse was passed on to Plath as well. Kohlberg’s stages of moral development measure an individual's “moral maturity”, and Plath and Walls are each in their own stage.
Jeannette demonstrated Level Three, Stage Five. Her deeper understanding of society and her impoverished situation are evidence of this, as she understands that rules and outcomes can be changed and moves to New York to start her own life because of that. Furthermore, she understands that her father and mother aren’t quite all there, and that they have serious mental issues. Plath demonstrates Level Two, Stage Four. Her understanding of the fact that her father’s treatment of her was wrong shows that she has passed stage three of level two, where she would have just been trying to please her father. However, she didn’t pass into Jeannette’s stage, because she didn’t try to change her situation and eventually that lead her to kill
herself. Sylvia Plath and Jeannette Walls demonstrated similar characteristics, such as the parenting styles of their fathers, but also differed in terms of how they ultimately developed, with Jeannette growing via willpower, and Plath by nature. Each demonstrated similar but different stages of Kohlberg’s Moral Development, as well. Ultimately, the two women are a testament to how similar parenting can still have two very different outcomes in children.
Level one is typically common in younger children. The two stages in level one are pre-conventional stages. Stage one is obedience and punishment driven; one will judge an action by the consequences given. Stage two is out of self interest. Level two is mostly common in teenagers.
In this touching, non-fiction memoir by Jeanette Walls, The Glass Castle recounts the story of her vagabond upbringing in the 1960‘s. Walls notes her parents lack of conformity while also showing their unconditional love, in rather unconventional ways. While touching the bases of alcoholism, poverty and child neglect, the author still maintains the point of a passionate determination to preserve the alliance with her siblings through it all.
In “The Glass Castle”, the author Jeanette Walls describes her childhood and what motivated her to chase her education and move out to New York City with her siblings and leave their parents behind in West Virginia. The main struggle Jeanette and her siblings had was the conflicting point of view that they had with their mother on parenting. Despite their father Rex Walls being an alcoholic, constantly facing unemployment, and being a source of hope for his children, Rose Mary Walls had her list of attributes that shaped her children’s life. Rose Mary had a very interesting view on parenting in Jeanette Wall’s memoir and this perspective of parenting influenced her children both positively and negatively.
Firstly, one’s identity is largely influenced by the dynamics of one’s relationship with their father throughout their childhood. These dynamics are often established through the various experiences that one shares with a father while growing up. In The Glass Castle and The Kite Runner, Jeannette and Amir have very different relationships with their fathers as children. However the experiences they share with these men undou...
the importance of those things. But, it can be a crucial symbol for someone’s life. That is the impact of symbolism in one’s life. In the book The Glass Castle, written by Jeannette Walls, The Glass Castle has a significant importance in her life. The Glass castle represents the status of the Walls family, the hope and faith for the future, and even life in general. In the story, The Glass Castle is used as the end goal of the Walls Family’s adventure of life. Furthermore, the Glass Castle supports Walls’ purpose of the hardships in life.
The simultaneous distance and closeness within the relationship between the father and the child are inevitable even in the most tragic and happy events in life. The poems “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad” by Jan Heller Levi and “In the Well” by Andrew Hudgins are both about the closeness and distance in a father and child relationship. Both poems are written in first person, or in the child’s point of view to emphasize the thoughts of distance and the experience of childhood thinking to the readers. The poems both use similar literary devices such as motifs and imagery to illustrate and accentuate the ideas of each event that the narrator, a child, experiences. Similarities between both poems are the use of water as a motif of the barrier to being farther away from the father, and the use of different synonyms for the word, father, to indicate the amount of distance at each point in the poems. On the other hand, each poem takes its route of distance in completely opposite directions. “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad” by Jan Heller Levi and “In the Well” by Andrew Hudgins accommodate the similarities for the use of the same motif, water, and the use of several synonyms for “dad” throughout the poems, but also differentiate because they proceed in opposite directions from the beginning to the end.
Brad Manning’s “Arm Wrestling with My Father” and Sarah Vowell’s “Shooting Dad” are two readings that are similar in topic but are presented in different ways. Manning describes his relationship with his father was a physical relationship. Vowell describes her relationship with her father as more political. In both Brad Manning’s and Sarah Vowell’s essays, they both had struggled to connect with their fathers at an early age and both come to a realization that their fathers aren’t immortal.
Intergenerational conflicts are an undeniable facet of life. With every generation of society comes new experiences, new ideas, and many times new morals. It is the parent’s job go work around these differences to reach their children and ensure they receive the necessary lessons for life. Flannery O’Connor makes generous use of this idea in several of her works. Within each of the three short stories, we see a very strained relationship between a mother figure and their child. We quickly find that O’Conner sets up the first to be receive the brunt of our attention and to some extent loathing, but as we grow nearer to the work’s characteristic sudden and violent ending, we grow to see the finer details and what really makes these relations
Character Response #1 “‘I didn 't propose to you,’ Dad said, ‘I told you I was going to marry you.” (Walls 27) This shows how Rex is a determined person, that he wants to be there for his wife no matter what happens. It shows he wants to be a wonderful husband and father and he won’t back down until he gets what her. He seems like a confident person and he is the reason they got married because he had true feelings for Rose Mary and he actually cared about her.
When looking into works of literature, some stories seem to be similar to others. They can have a similar setting, point of view, theme, or sense of language and style. However, all of these points could be very different as well and could cover different theme or style. Flannery O’Conner’s “Good Country People” and Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use” have some contrasting elements, such as their points of view and use of symbolism, but their similarities in the underlying theme, language, and the setting of these stories reveal how these two stories are impacted by education on both the individual and their family.
It is commonly believed that the only way to overcome difficult situations is by taking initiative in making a positive change, although this is not always the case. The theme of the memoir the Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls is that the changes made in children’s lives when living under desperate circumstances do not always yield positive results. In the book, Jeannette desperately tries to improve her life and her family’s life as a child, but she is unable to do so despite her best efforts. This theme is portrayed through three significant literary devices in the book: irony, symbolism and allusion.
The aspect of character development plays a prominent role in various works of literature, and no exceptions arose within this novel. Jeannette Walls, author of The Glass Castle, uses detailed portions of the story to prominently display her character development and vibrantly show growth. The memoir follows the life of Jeannette and the struggles she faces along her journey. Living in a blue collar family, she faces many challenges that the average person may not deal with. Though the adventurous and wild-hearted Jeannette slowly begins to face reality and must adapt to her situations. Throughout the novel she matures and develops, altering her personality and thoughts. Several occurrences in the novel affect certain aspects of her personality and change certain beliefs that she once had. Her thoughts on her parents, the reality of the family's issues, and the beliefs of her future all begin to clear up and shift as she develops as a character.
Could the dysfunction of the Walls family have fostered the extraordinary resilience and strength of the three older siblings through a collaborative set of rites of passage? One could argue that the unusual and destructive behavior of the parents forced the children into a unique collection of rites of passage that resulted in surprisingly resilient and successful adults. In moving back to Welch, Virginia, the children lost what minimal sense of security they may have enjoyed while living in their grandmother’s home in Arizona. The culture and climate (both socially and environmentally) along with an increased awareness of their poverty resulted in a significant loss of identity. As they learned new social and survival skills in this desperate environment, there is a powerful sense of camaraderie between the older children. Their awareness, drive and cunning survival skills while living in Welch result in a developing sense of confidence in their ability to survive anything. This transition, while wretched, sets the stage for their ability to leave their environment behind with little concern for a lack of success. As the children leave, one by one, to New York, they continue to support one another, and emerge as capable, resourceful young adults.
...and how we perceive ideas about what writers are trying to get across. This story is a clear representation of family values and true inheritance.
Even with the differences in relationship with their fathers, both Sylvia Plath and Theodore Roethke struggled with depression and mental illness due to losing a major parental figure like their fathers at young ages. It is difficult to lose someone and you can see in Plath’s and Roethke’s writings that they had complicated relationships with their fathers that shaped and influenced their