Comparing The Explorer, And Frederick Douglass

669 Words2 Pages

Different Perspectives
(How The Explorer, and Frederick Douglass differ through social and archetypal perspectives.)

Literature. The most accurate pieces of information that the world has today. There are millions of millions of book, or texts that have been written. Some are absolutely true accounts, while others are slightly falsified and then there are the out right lies that are written. Writing has developed to the point where authors have meanings behind their work, that are hidden in the words. Perspectives have also changed with the people of today. There are two perspectives that The Explorer by Gwendolyn Brooks, and Frederick Douglass by Robert Hayden can be read at: social and archetypal.

Both of the aforementioned texts were …show more content…

This particular poem is relatively short, only fourteen lines; however, Gwendolyn says a lot in this piece. It starts out saying that the narrator would like to find some peace in the household. Searching, searching, not able to find relief from the human voices that follow them around. The narrator doesn't want to deal with the griefs and the choices especially. This can be related the the African American struggle of the time because not a hundred years earlier, slavery was a common practice. Slaves would do whatever the white man said. Never having been given any choice in the matter making them afraid to finally do so for themselves. “He feared most of all the choices, that cried to be taken,” (pg.1064, line 12). It can also be related to everyone else in that now that change of the treatment of African Americans was coming about, they demanded to be heard. Perhaps the average white man was seeking relief from the voices he heard and the decisions he was faced with everyday due to …show more content…

Hayden's text deals more directly with freedom and liberty compared to Brooks. “When it is finally ours, this freedom, this liberty...” (pg. 1067, line 1). He talks of how these two concepts are and should be as necessary as those things of survival, like breathing. He also compares it to diastole and systole, the opening and closing of the heart and how that's involuntary, just as the mentioned rights should be for everyone. This can be related to African Americans because their rights at the time were currently lesser than that of white people. This shows the imbalance and difficulties it presented. It could also be related to everyone in that he compares it to pieces of survival that everybody needs in order to live. So it specifies no one in

Open Document