Comparing The Australian Flag And The Coat Of Arms

586 Words2 Pages

The symbols of our nation represent who we are. Some of us are supportive of these symbols but others disagree that they represent modern Australia. The Australian flag and the Coat of Arms are symbols that represent an Australia that we do not live in. Both national symbols are stereotypical, do not represent our diverse society and do not include our national colours or history. The national symbols should be changed to something that represents modern Australia.

Kangaroos and emus are native to Australia, but how many of us have actually seen an emu? The Coat of Arms is stereotyped in a way it implies that these animals are everywhere in Australia. However, they may be seen daily in some parts of Australia like the Alice Springs but in places near the coast, many would not have seen these native animals. Although the …show more content…

This is not the case for the Australian flag. A Union Jack, the Southern Cross and the Commonwealth Star, are all elements that represent Great Britain. These symbols may be important to those with a British background, however, it does not include those of other backgrounds. Australia is a diverse society with 50% of people born overseas and 20% of Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders (2016 census) with a 2.2% annual growth rate (www.abs.gov.au). This leaves out the majority of the population. A flag should represent a nation proudly and honorably, but when the majority of the people are left out, does this suggest that we are not satisfied with the citizens in this modern country? Although the Australian flag is not a precise representation of modern Australia, the Union Jack is still relevant to today’s society. The Union Jack depicts the convict past of our nation and British settlement of this nation. To make this flag represent modern Australia, our diverse cultural needs to be shown through the Australian

Open Document