Comparing Romulus And Remus, Hamlet, And Wonder Woman

1024 Words3 Pages

It is not uncommon for narratives of different genres to have some similarities that allow for comparison. However, evaluating the differences aside from unifying elements serve to set them apart. Despite having been written millennia apart and for different audiences, “Romulus and Remus,” Hamlet, and Wonder Woman have elements in them that allow for comparison, and through comparison, it is possible to reveal the differences that lead to the drastically different outcomes for the same principle action—murder of a family member. While Wonder Woman and Hamlet were primarily written for leisure and entertainment for the audience (inclusive of young children), the purpose of “Romulus and Remus” was as more of a historical record. Therefore, the …show more content…

The primary aggressor in “Romulus and Remus” is Romulus himself, who murders his brother in cold blood over a disagreement about where to build a great city (). In Hamlet, Claudius grows jealous of his brother, King Hamlet, so he murders him and takes both his kingdom and his wife. The principle aggressor in Wonder Woman is Ares, son of Zeus and Hera, who chooses to fight, and attempts to kill, his sister Diana (Wonder Woman) in order to obtain his goal of destroying mankind. While all three multiforms are connected by this component of (attempted) murder of one’s own family member, the differences within the narratives are critical in understanding why each piece had different consequences for their respective …show more content…

Instead, they were banished from their home as infants, cast into the woods, and left to fend for themselves (Langhorne 1798:84). Plutarch’s description of the siblings never quite focuses intently on the relationship between the siblings as twin brothers. Rather, more details are stressed on their individual characters. Both brothers are described as strong warriors, quick thinkers, intelligent leaders, and men who are unafraid to use violence in times where it is deemed righteous (Langhorne 1798:87). Although the brothers from childhood to adulthood were mainly together, their relationship dealt was more mutualistic than full of affection. As a consequence, the lack of a strong fraternal bond between the two brothers, and the general acceptance of violence as a means to solve conflict throughout the narrative, led to Romulus killing his brother, without facing severe

Open Document