Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Function of children's literature
Function of children's literature
The source of aggression
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Function of children's literature
It is not uncommon for narratives of different genres to have some similarities that allow for comparison. However, evaluating the differences aside from unifying elements serve to set them apart. Despite having been written millennia apart and for different audiences, “Romulus and Remus,” Hamlet, and Wonder Woman have elements in them that allow for comparison, and through comparison, it is possible to reveal the differences that lead to the drastically different outcomes for the same principle action—murder of a family member. While Wonder Woman and Hamlet were primarily written for leisure and entertainment for the audience (inclusive of young children), the purpose of “Romulus and Remus” was as more of a historical record. Therefore, the …show more content…
values pressed in each of the multiforms differ. “Romulus and Remus” features a more objective, chronological sequence of events, as Romulus seeks utmost power and is unafraid to destroy anything in his way, including his own family members. Wonder Woman and Hamlet, on the other hand, show the importance of family within their respective narratives, which leads to different consequences, in comparison to “Romulus and Remus,” for those that go against their family. While all three multiforms feature the murder or at least, attempted murder, of a sibling, the consequences of the action are for more dire for Wonder Woman and Hamlet than for “Romulus and Remus,” as the aforementioned (former two?) narratives stress the importance of familial relations to a greater extent. The three narratives are share a common element of attempted or successful member of a family member.
The primary aggressor in “Romulus and Remus” is Romulus himself, who murders his brother in cold blood over a disagreement about where to build a great city (). In Hamlet, Claudius grows jealous of his brother, King Hamlet, so he murders him and takes both his kingdom and his wife. The principle aggressor in Wonder Woman is Ares, son of Zeus and Hera, who chooses to fight, and attempts to kill, his sister Diana (Wonder Woman) in order to obtain his goal of destroying mankind. While all three multiforms are connected by this component of (attempted) murder of one’s own family member, the differences within the narratives are critical in understanding why each piece had different consequences for their respective …show more content…
aggressors. From the time Romulus and Remus were young and to adulthood, they were never part of a structural family—as part of the archetypal mother, father, and children family unit.
Instead, they were banished from their home as infants, cast into the woods, and left to fend for themselves (Langhorne 1798:84). Plutarch’s description of the siblings never quite focuses intently on the relationship between the siblings as twin brothers. Rather, more details are stressed on their individual characters. Both brothers are described as strong warriors, quick thinkers, intelligent leaders, and men who are unafraid to use violence in times where it is deemed righteous (Langhorne 1798:87). Although the brothers from childhood to adulthood were mainly together, their relationship dealt was more mutualistic than full of affection. As a consequence, the lack of a strong fraternal bond between the two brothers, and the general acceptance of violence as a means to solve conflict throughout the narrative, led to Romulus killing his brother, without facing severe
ramifications. In Hamlet, the importance of familial bonds are shown, and are upheld by most of the characters in the play. Claudius through his jealousy and envy is the principle aggressor in the family, and the one who first breaks the bond the familial bond. Claudius murders King Hamlet, and attempts to disregard it as an accident—a mere untimely death of a good king as he was bitten by a serpent while napping in castle’s orchard (HOW TO CITE HELP). In addition, King Hamlet’s widow, Queen Gertrude, waited for only two months before marrying her brother-in-low, potentially betraying her King Hamlet, insulting her some Prince Hamlet, in order to presumably to keep the role of Queen (Act I, Scene 2). Although Claudius feels remorse for his actions in confession (Act III, Scene 3, Line 40), he still attempts to murder his nephew and step-son Prince Hamlet (CITE), through staging a “rigged” fight against Laertes. Prince Hamlet shows a fierce loyalty to his father, and vows to avenge his death (CITE). However, in the process of doing so, he becomes blinded by revenge, and not much unlike his uncle, is not hesitant in attempting to murder family members. In essence, Claudius and the rest of the principle characters in the play all, for their own reasons and with their own methods, break the family unit, which results in dire consequences for each member. The antagonist in Wonder Woman, Ares, understands the family unit, having grown up with his parents, Zeus and Hera. However, as shown in the movie, his violent tendencies have him banished (CITE??). As a consequence, Ares becomes very jaded, especially towards the human race—he believes them to be inherently corrupt. On his path to cause corruption and chaos to mankind, and eventually destroying them entirely, he is unafraid to go against the wishes of his family in preserving peace. He does show slight hesitation before attempting to kill his sister, Diana, requesting her to join his cause, but after she refuses to relent, he resolves to murder her since she stands in his way (CITE). On the other hand, his sister, Diana, understands the importance of family, love, and the goodness of people. Having grown up with the Amazons, a tightly-knit community, she is well-understanding of the emotional bonds between family members and the necessity of affection and bonds (CITE). In addition, her experiences with Captain Trevor, Charlie, Sameer, and Chief Napi, only reinforce her opinion that mankind is in fact, good, and only negatively influenced by Ares. As a result of wanting to uphold her the Gods’ wishes, who send her to Earth as the God-Killer, as well as her own personal beliefs that Ares is a tyrant, she is forced to kill her brother (CITE). Since Ares’s justification for attempting to kill his sister was more selfish and destructive than Diana’s, the consequences he faces are far more severe than Diana’s.
With our culture, we find certain kinds of inaccuracies, such as the exaggeration Beowulf’s boast, to be unstimulating. As a society, we now have the knowledge and common sense to not believe everything we hear without validation. Because of this, our culture places more value on entertainment that is more realistic within the actions of the characters, but more complex within the plot itself and how the characters interact with each
The movie Minority Report and the book Oedipus the King both explore similar themes, and imagery. Consistently throughout both features, the idea of presumed murder, the imagery of sight, and the question of predetermined fate shape each storyline and provoke similarities between them.
In the opening of both the play and the novel we are introduced to the two main female characters which we see throughout both texts. The authors’ styles of writing effectively compare and contrast with one another, which enables the reader to see a distinct difference in characters, showing the constrictions that society has placed upon them.
In Oedipus Rex by Sophocles and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, there is a deception where readers think one thing, but are presented with a different point of view. They are profoundly similar for various reasons regarding structure and theme. They are complementary in establishing the primary conflict of drama during the storyline; however, Oedipus Rex encompasses foreshadowing that divulges drama from past experiences. Additionally, the authors incorporate violence as a key component in the conflict presented. However, the drama differs in plot, as well as symbolism, in which the reader understands it before or amid the story through gradual discovery. The themes and presentation of these dramatic plots are initially compelling, distinctive,
Famous texts often have many similarities as it makes good discussions to find all the possible things that are very related to one another. These certain texts between Romeo and Juliet and Pyarum and Thisbe are almost so closely related, that there are infamous of resemblances that you can point out. There are the obvious general observations, but once you dig deep, you find that there are much more comparisons that meet the eye. Since they are so closely related, we are able to really truly understand the concepts that stand out through each reading. This will make our thoughts deeper and more powerful towards both texts. In Romeo and Juliet, the text is very similar to Pyramus and Thisbe through a love connection between characters even though differences between families make it a struggle, miscommunication and misunderstandings, and the conclusion of a tragedy.
Set ages apart, Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman and Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex provide different perspectives on the topic of tragedy and what is defined as a tragic hero. Although Oedipus would be thought of as better representing the tragic hero archetype due to tradition and time period, the modern tragic hero of Oedipus Rex is more of a dismal one. Through analysis of their respective hamartias, it is exemplified that the New York businessman with his humble story proves to be more thought provoking than the King of Thebes and his melancholic tale. **By incorporating a more relatable character and plot, Arthur Miller lends help to making Willy Lowman spiral toward his own downfall while building more emotion and response from the audience than with Oedipus. When Oedipus learns of his awful actions, this invokes shock and desperation.
Gioia, Dana, and X.J. Kennedy. "Oedipus the King." Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing, Compact Edition, Interactive Edition. 5th ed. New York: Pearson; Longman Publishing, 2007. 887-924. Print.
Death is the end to the natural cycle of life and is represented as dark, melancholic and even menacing. The underworld is depicted as a murky and sinister realm where the dead are trapped in a world of eternal darkness. Ancient drama, however, defies the conventional perceptions and representations of death. Despite the foreboding associated with it, characters in ancient drama embrace death in its frightening glory, rather than face the repercussions of their actions, especially when their honor and pride are at stake. Deceit is also an integral part of ancient drama and characters, particularly women, fall prey to it and unwittingly unleash chaos that more often that, negatively impacts the lives of the characters. This paper demonstrates how gender biases can be interpreted from the depiction of death and the characters’ justifications of it in two of Sophocles’ plays – Ajax and Women of Trachis and also demonstrates how female deception leads to the death of the principal character(s).
While Romulus is credited for exemplifying many of Rome;’s fundamental values, his reign over Rome is one that is infamous for its abundant bloodshed, violence against Rome’s neighbouring cities and demonstrations of his accumulated power. In comparison to Romulus’ rule, King Numa Pompilius reign is filled with undisturbed peace and coexistence in Rome and its neighbouring communities. Romulus often resorts to utilizing methods like violence or deceit to achieve his aspirations for the glory of Rome. One of the very first of Romulus’ acts of violence “to obtain sole power” (Livy 37) is to brutally murder his own twin brother, Remus in an angry fit of rage. The murder of Remus is a reflection of Romulus’ violent, ruthless nature and demonstrates the drastic measures he will go to achieve ultimate power. “To increase the dignity and impressiveness of his [ki...
1. Plays have foils to help the audience understand important characters in the play. Foils are minor characters that have similarities and differences with a more important character in the play. Sometimes the minor character is just there for the character to talk to; this is the basis for being a foil. In the play "Hamlet," [Titles] by William Shakespeare, the character Ophelia is a foil to Hamlet.
The tragic hero is one of literatures most used (and sometimes abused) characters. The classical definition of a tragic hero is, “a person with heroic or potentially heroic qualities. The person is doomed by the Gods or some other supernatural force to destruction or suffering. The hero struggles against the fate, but due to a personal flaw, ultimately fails in the battle against fate. It is my personal opinion that Brutus,as he is portrayed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is a tragic hero by this definition. I came to this conclusion due to the fact that Brutus shares many similarities with other tragic heroes in literature such as Oedipus, Hamlet, and Ralph from Lord of the Flies. All four characters share the two critical traits that are needed to be tragic heroes: a tragic flaw that eventually leads to a tragic downfall. The tragic hero was defined by Aristotle, yet the “invention” of the tragic hero goes to Sophocles.
Although Incendies (2010), filmed by Denis Villeneuve, is the rewrite of Sophocles’ play, Oedipus The King, these two stories have their own variations in them. Both of their narratives are surrounding with the same concept: nobody could escape from their family’s history, which it has some tragedy outcomes and violence as the characters’ journey begin. Each character from Oedipus Tyrannus and Incendies responds differently obtaining knowledge about their past, and the closure of these two stories are completely diverse.
Both works, “Macbeth” and “Oedipus,” are well-known tragic plays that illicit important world views on matters of life. They are similar in that their plots are centered on one main concept, their protagonist’s fate and reach a resolution as they are fulfilled to the letter. Both characters were foretold directly or indirectly what their destinies were to be and inevitably, they come true. Macbeth was told by three witches that he would become king, and even though it is unclear whether they possessed supernatural powers or invented the story, it became a reality in his mind and a goal to pursue. Likewise, Oedipus was punished by the gods for killing a sacred being, a sphinx, and his fate of killing his father and marrying his mother infallibly materializes in his future even though he tries to run away and e...
Ophelia and Desdemona play the role of the "innocent lady" in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Othello. The roles of these characters provide a sense of completeness, faithfulness, and obedience to the leading male figures. In both plays, these innocent ladies end up dying. These deaths are both due to a false rejection of love. Othello kills Desdemona because he believes her love is false, and Ophelia dies ultimately because she reads Hamlet's mask of madness as rejection. These deaths exemplify the pattern of harmony turning to chaos in both of these plays, and provide proof of the decay that is spreading to everyone in Venice and Denmark.
Realizing the heinous nature of his actions, Oedipus blinds himself in a fit of anger and remorse - now, as Tiresias, he can see. In an age where popular entertainment is apparently guided by the maxim "more is better" (see the body count in any popular "action thriller") and "special effects" dominate, Oedipus Rex achieves its climax in a refreshingly concise and intelligent manner.