Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Poem analysis
How has religion affected literature
The impact of religion on American literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Poem analysis
Poems are a great way to open venues and foster our emotional learning and thinking, but it can also complicate a simple message. Human life has been a mystery ever since the beginning. People are constantly thinking about other life form like extraterrestrial or if there’s a higher form of life like a god. For others, religion is the answer and worshiping a god that most people have never seen before. Dickinson being a devout Christian knows there’s God. Frost, on the other hand, was widely believed to be an atheist, but had an interest in Christianity. Dickinson’s “Heaven is What I Cannot Reach” and Frost’s “Design” both have the sense of higher life. But Dickinson view it as something unreachable, but Frost sees it as an attainable, incomprehensible object. Comparing the poems will give a better insight on the poem’s meaning.
Dickinson’s “Heaven is What I Cannot Reach” has all over Dickinson’s writing style mainly because of the
…show more content…
For Dickinson, heaven is a place she cannot reach because of certain memories and circumstances. But linking it with “Design”, it shows that with death, one can reach the top of a sacred place. As Dickinson said, “The Apple on the Tree- / Provided it do hopeless – hang- / That Heaven is-to Me!”, referring to the infamous event in heaven involving the Tree of Knowledge (Dickinson lines 3-4). It seems she wants to go to a paradise free of pain and sorrow, but she still persists on going regardless of its past. The flower representing the tree, the moth representing Adam, and the spider for the serpent. Frost the second stanza of his poem asks, “What brought the kindred spider to that height” coincides with the question, how did the serpent or Satan get to heaven if he was cast out and forbidden to return. Going back to Dickinson, the answer may be that the interpretation to “Her teasing Purples - Afternoon” is about heaven and the spider was delighted to reach
Dickinson 's poem uses poetic devices of personification to represent death, she represents death as if it were a living being. Dickinson 's capitalization of the word “DEATH”, causes us to see death as a name, in turn it becomes noun, a person, and a being, rather than what it truly is, which is the culminating even of human life. The most notable use of this, is seen in the very first few lines of the poem when Dickinson says “Because I could not stop for Death, He kindly stopped for me”. In her poem Dickinson makes death her companion, as it is the person who is accompanying her to her grave. She states that death kindly stopped for her and she even goes as far as to give death the human ability to stop and pick her up. The occasion of death through Dickinson use of personification makes it seem like an interaction between two living beings and as a result the poem takes on a thoughtful and light hearted tone. The humanization of death makes the experience more acceptable and less strange, death takes on a known, familiar, recognizable form which in turn makes the experience more relatable. As the poem
Although both poems were written by the same poet around the same time, their idea of what lies after death differs. In one of the poems, there appears to be an afterlife, while in the other poem, there is nothing. For example, in her work of, “Because I Could Not Stop for Death”, Dickinson tells the reader a tale of a woman being taken away by Death. The Death would either take the women to hell or heaven, giving us our first indication of an afterlife. Also in the fifth stanza, Death and the woman make a stop before a house where they see “… The Roof was scarcely visible – The Cornice in the Ground-“; the woman is lying in the soil beneath, where her Soul and Spirits are looking towards the house, representing an afterlife. As the poem proceeds to the sixth stanza, the reader is given a conclusive evidence of the afterlife when the woman revives how it has been centuries since the death has come to visit...
Emily Dickinson was an intricate and contradictory figure who moved from a reverent faith in God to a deep suspicion of him in her works. (Sherwood 3) Through her own intentional choice she was, in her lifetime, considered peculiar. Despite different people and groups trying to influence her, she resisted making a public confession of faith to Christ and the Church. (Sherwood 10) She wanted to establish her own wanted to establish her own individuality and, in doing so, turned to poetry. (Benfey 27) Dickinson’s poems were a sort of channel for her feelings and an “exploration” of her faith (Benfey 27).
2). Again, there is a slight change of tone, as Dickinson reminds us of how hope exists in any place, across all lands, across all seas, and in the hearts of every single being. She also reminds us of how hope asks nothing of us, only a resting place to perch, but it does not require a crumb of nourishment, yet provides warmth for all. God, too, never asks for a crumb, but is the creator of the hope, which perches in the soul, the creator of the warmth that the bird holds and gives to all. The tone and word choice in both the second and third stanzas further promote Dickinson’s theme, hope will never dwindle or abandon a soul, no matter the size of the
Dickinson, on the other hand, was a free-style writer. She was carefree of how her writings do not include any type of meter or structure. She did not use standard punctuation. Instead, she referred to the use of dashes, unsystematic capitalization, and broken meter. It is not clear as to why she chose such a unique style of writing, but it worked for her. She was not concerned with correctness but with structure that would include considerate features. In “Defrauded I a Butterfly,” Dickinson left little room for meter or style used from European models in her time being it only consisted on two lines. Also, in “I’m Nobody! Who Are You?” the reader may recognize that the she did not use a traditional rhyme scheme that would usually be able to identify in poetry. She used AABC instead of the more noticeable and most often used ABAB or a more rare scheme ABCB.
In both the first and second stanza, Dickinson is trying to make sense of her feelings by eliminating the different possibilities of her current mental state. She uses specific details in order to make these images clear to the reader: Dickinson is standing up, so these feelings cannot be that of death; bells are ringing to signify mid-day, hence the darkness surrounding her cannot be a result of night; the cold she is experiencing is not physical because she can also feel siroccos, which is a hot, dry wind that blows from northern Africa across southern Europe, on her skin; nor can the hea...
On to the case with Dickinson she did write with a defined structure to her works. Dickinson’s style of writing used a ballad stanza, these were four line stanzas. So by comparing both of their works, their structure is different. Another key difference with both works is their use of rhyme in the works.
Emily Dickinson had a fascination with death and mortality throughout her life as a writer. She wrote many poems that discussed what it means not only to die, but to be dead. According to personal letters, Dickinson seems to have remained agnostic about the existence of life after death. In a letter written to Mrs. J. G. Holland, Emily implied that the presence of death alone is what makes people feel the need for heaven: “If roses had not faded, and frosts had never come, and one had not fallen here and there whom I could not waken, there were no need of other Heaven than the one below.” (Bianchi 83). Even though she was not particularly religious, she was still drawn to the mystery of the afterlife. Her poetry is often contemplative of the effect or tone that death creates, such as the silence, decay, and feeling of hopelessness. In the poem “I died for beauty,” Dickinson expresses the effect that death has on one's identity and ability to impact the world for his or her ideals.
In Emily Dickinson’s “I Dwell in Possibility-” she condescendingly celebrates the esoteric ability to unveil mind as a medium to heavenly experiences through the use of conceit, imagery, and illusion. Initially Dickson partitions those that “dwell in Possibility” far away from the inane inexplicable group that lives in a “fairer house than Prose” Wasting No time to identify the strengths of those that are able to break into the mind are far greater than those that live the simple life . In other words, Dickinson’s “possibility” is limitless similar to the underlying conceit of the mind. She no longer mixes with the strangers in the “fairer house” down the street because she is of much higher class and has more time rearing activities than mix with the trivial neighbors. The use of conceit at the early stage of the poem further emphasizes the condescension that Dickinson shadows throughout the poem. Specifically Dickson use of conceit establishes the underlying meaning that only those who are able to use their imagination can connect a house to their mind will understand her work but more importantly the meaning of life. Dickinson continues to explain that the esoteric have “more numerous of
Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost both think that individuality is very important to a person equally like Ralph Emerson. Although they may have a lot in common these poets are different in many ways. Both Frost and Dickinson were American poets and were both from New England. A big similarity between Frost and Dickinson both talk about death. Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost both talk about the power of nature in their poetry. Frost and Dickinson have a reasonable evidence on why human beings should live life to their own agenda but, what if that person cannot stop living somebody else dreams? How can these poems help people break away for society and become a strong confidence individual person?
Imagery is a big component to most works of poetry. Authors strive to achieve a certain image for the reader to paint in their mind. Dickinson tries to paint a picture of ?death? in her own words. Thomas A. Johnson, an interpretive author of Dickinson's work, says that ?In 1863 Death came into full statue as a person. ?Because I could not stop for Death? is a superlative achievement wherein Death becomes one of the greatest characters of literature? (Johnson). Dickinson's picture to the audience is created by making ?Death? an actual character in the poem. By her constantly calling death either ?his? or ?he,? she denotes a specific person and gender. Dickinson also compares ?Death? to having the same human qualities as the other character in the poem. She has ?Death? physically arriving and taking the other character in the carriage with him. In the poem, Dickinson shows the reader her interpretation of what this person is going through as they are dying and being taken away by ?Death?. Dickinson gives images such as ?The Dews drew quivering and chill --? and ?A Swelling of the Ground --? (14, 18). In both of these lines, Dickinson has the reader conjure up subtle images of death. The ?quivering an chill? brings to the reader's mind of death being ...
“This World is not Conclusion” is Dickinson’s swan song on the subject of afterlife. She confirms all her previous statements, but in a more resolute and certain way.... ... middle of paper ... ... This, then, is the central theme of all her poems: Though she believes strongly in the idea of an afterlife, she understands that nothing is certain, but that a bit of logic and a large amount of faith will guide her through the chaotic journey towards her final resting place—wherever or whatever it may be.
In her poem “I could not stop for Death-“ she uses many dashes. “Or rather – He passed us – / The Dews drew quivering and chill – / For only Gossamer, my Gown – / My Tippet – only Tulle –" (Dickinson, 13-16). These dashes allowed for the poem to flow and connect. She was able to make the poem flow in the manner that she wanted through the use of dashes. Dickinson also used personification throughout the entire poem. Dickinson gives death human traits and carries these traits through the poem. Another common Dickinson trait is unusual capitalization. Emily Dickinson capitalizes words that she wishes to draw emphasis to. This capitalization allows for readers to focus on the important aspects of the poetry. As we look at the length of the poem we can recognize Dickinson’s use of short lines and stanzas. Although she has short poems she uses compression to fit a lot of meaning into a small amount of words. The final trait can be noticed in the fact that her poem is titled after the first line of the poem. Dickinson did not name her poems in her lifetime and they are now named based on the first line of the poem. As displayed in this paragraph we see that Dickinson has many literary devices that benefit her. She is able to bring more meaning to such a simple poem through the use of dashes, capitalization, personification, and
Through the text Dickinson shows the reader that the little bird or better known as our “hope” keeps us with high hopes, but there are also some events that will happen that will shatter our hope or as Dickinson states “ That could abash the little Bird/ That kept so many warm.” For this reason Dickinson displays free thought in her Dickinson’s appearance of free thought was shown throughout the whole poem by thinking outside the box and comparing a bird to the hope in every single individual's life. Thus concluding her free thought in her poem “Hope” is the thing with feathers.” Throughout Dickinson’s poems “This is my letter to the World” there are forms of transcendentalism in the writing. To be more specific, the form of transcendentalism Dickinson uses in her poem “This is my letter to the world” is important to nature.
She envisions that he would not be sufficiently solid to that for her. Her second contention inside of this segment is that, upon his demise, denied the "Privilege of Frost," she would ache for death. In the third segment of the ballad, Dickinson envisions the last judgment, and how it may be overpowered by her natural adoration. She is not able to see or experience heaven in light of the fact that she is so overcome with her vision of him—not just his face "put out" the substance of Jesus like a flame, yet he "immersed her sight" such a great amount in life that she is not able to "see" heaven, importance, maybe that he diverted her from devotion. The speaker 's involvement in this lyric is profoundly connected to locate, and recommends that that which can 't be seen can 't be experienced. In the stanza starting "They 'd judge us," there is a finished breakdown of rhyme; when she keeps in touch with "I wouldn 't," she be able to not rhyme, and the wavering echoes the broken delicacy of the first