Comparing Poems 'A Barred Owl And The History Teacher'

631 Words2 Pages

In the poems “A Barred Owl” by Richard Wilbur and “The History Teacher” by Billy Collins, both poets include literary elements such as forced enjambment/caesura and stressed shifts/division to showcase a universal theme of preserving innocence and tainting the horrors of the world for their own personal comfort, illustrating that while the protection of innocence seems like a necessary ideal, is it beneficial to the growth of the child? Fear is a natural and instinctual emotion that all beings experience, especially at the vulnerable stage of a blissful childhood. And while it may seem necessary to try to prevent any negative emotions and suffering found in this state of terror, it begs the question of whether or not such horrors can be beneficial towards a child’s …show more content…

In continuation of this theory, both poets include clear shifts in their pieces to divide the discomfort of the protector from the naivety and ignorance of the children. Take, for example, the stanza division in Wilbur’s poem, where his first stanza ends with the question “’Who cooks for you?’” (Wilbur 6). The inclusion of this isolated question is used as a parent’s explanation of the owl’s fearful chant, explaining that the assonance of the owl’s hoot mimics the assonance in the terms “cooks” and “you.” It is a clear lie that the parents express with the only intention of making both parties comfortable. However, this is ineffective as we see the child’s curiosity and analysis in the following stanza. In comparison, Collins also uses shifts to divide the teacher’s comfort and his student’s curiosity and questioning. The first half of the poem is the teacher’s justification of his censorship while the ending of the poem ends with the student’s own analysis, challenging their “protector’s” methods by openly “wondering if they would believe that soldiers in the Boer War told long, rambling stories...” (Collins

Open Document