Comparing Morality In The Dalai Lama And Pope John Paul II

1032 Words3 Pages

Both the Dalai Lama and Pope John Paul II discuss the relationship between religion and morality in their writings. The Dalai Lama clearly states in his book, Ethics for the New Millennium, that his views on ethics are not influenced by any religion, including his own: Tibetan Buddhism. The Pope openly believes that morality and his religion, Catholicism, go hand-in-hand, and one cannot work without the other, which he explains further in his Veritatis Splendor letter. In this paper, I will argue that the Dalai Lama and Pope John Paul II are both influenced by their religions, though not equally, in their discussions of morality. Other than the actual religious differences, they view morality in very similar ways.
The Dalai Lama and John Paul II acknowledge that all people, regardless of religious background (or lack thereof), long for happiness in life, and in some cases, after life as well. They also agree that happiness is not found in material possessions or progress. The Dalai Lama conveys this through his observation that “materially developed countries…are …show more content…

For example, he brings up the “Maydhyamika,” or “Middle Way,” an idea that says the world is essentially a connected organism led by cause and effect. Everything is dependent and nothing stands alone. Good and bad deeds all effect something else and each life links to other lives, forever blurring the distinction between the “self” and the “other.” He then says that, due to the Madhyamika and its notion of connectivity, everybody’s individual happiness depends on the happiness of others, and everyone must act accordingly. He also discusses the idea that “life is suffering,” and that the goal of human nature remains the desire to avoid or end that suffering, a part of the Buddhists’ Four Noble

Open Document