Comparing Metropolis And 1984

1338 Words3 Pages

For the attention of the publisher, Tara University Press, This cover reflects my interpretation of the texts Metropolis (1927) directed by Fritz Lang and 1984 (1948) written by George Orwell. Metropolis is a silent film created during the Weimar Republic in Germany. It draws on Expressionism to highlight meaning and important aspects of the film’s message. Although this is seen as a golden age of cultural renewal and experimentation in Germany, they were still suffering the effects of the losses from WW1. This film is significant because it was part of the extremely visual culture of the time and was presented as entertainment. 1984 entered a world still reeling from the devastating effects of WW2. British society was particularly stratified …show more content…

Both texts share the common element of Power, with the Power figure dominating the life of the classes under them. The male protagonists perceive that something is not right in the society they lived in, due to the power figure or group. The image of a brain covered in barbed wire is contrasted with another brain thinking about what it wants and needs in life. This is because in 1984 the Outer Party could not own or experience things people in the 21st century take for granted. They did not have free choice about sex, love, food and freedom due to the totalitarian …show more content…

The red fist shows Democratic Socialism which was Orwell’s hope for the future of Britain. 1984 shows what Orwell believed could happen in the future if an autocrat ran a totalitarian state so 1984 was written as a warning against the development of a totalitarian regime. Metropolis contains, however, a hope for the future, as Lang believed all classes could work together. Winston and Freder both tried to defy and change the society they lived in, however Winston drastically failed, by giving into the society he lived in, but Freder became the mediator, or the heart, between the hands who were the workers, and the head, who was his father Frederson. Metropolis had a hopeful ending, with the view that revolution was destructive and that cooperation with authority was a better alternative and in order to rise up against the power figure you need cooperation which is what Freder brought. However, in 1984 rebellion and revolution are encouraged but ultimately futile. This is demonstrated when Winston’s desire for privacy and personal thoughts and possessions is taken away from him and he is eventually brainwashed into believing everything the state told him, showing how, no matter how hard workers tried, they could not be free to live at their own accord. The book starts with Winston hating Big Brother “Down with Big Brother” and, “I hate Big

Open Document