Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on transcendentalism literature
Transcendentalism essays
Essay on transcendentalism literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lydia Maria Child and Henry David Thoreau expose their private cultural realities, while challenging urban life through rural nature at Walden Pond and the urban streets in New York. Furthermore, Lydia Maria Child and Henry David Thoreau are both influenced by romanticism through transcendentalism, which relates how objects of the world are essentially only small excerpts of the all-inclusive universe. Although Lydia Maria Child and Henry David Thoreau are similar in their quest to challenge superficial urban life and individual simplicity, each author respond differently to their vivid surroundings and celebrating togetherness or with individual loneliness.
Lydia Maria Child and Henry David Thoreau both challenge simplicity in cultural realities,
…show more content…
however the authors individually challenge their cultural realities in their own unique settings. Lydia Child, a known activist, responds to the understanding of a certain spiritual struggle within an individual, and the temptations of existence surrounding New York. Consequently, Child, who celebrated togetherness, is exposing life in a major city, containing a great number of people within an inadequate space. For example, Child explains, “My spirit is weary for rural rambles. It is sad walking in the city (109).” Child refers to the only joy derived from living her urban life was the rising and setting of the sun, which distracted her from the weary eyes searching for comfort and hope within the world. Child’s weariness is rooted deep within loneliness of the soul. Furthermore, the author refers to the economy of New York stating, “Pence I will give thee, though political economy reprove the dead (192).” Consequently, Child elucidates the impression that distributing charity may result in overall dependency. Lydia Child presents a specific example to a solution of this economic problem. Lydia Maria Child states, “if the Law of Love prevailed, vases of Gold and Silver might even more abound–but no homeless outcast would sit shivering beneath their glittering mockery (192).” The author’s previous statement regarding providing a solution consisted of living more simply and avoiding the distraction of fast-moving urban New York. Like Lydia Maria Child, Thoreau being one of the fathers of transcendentalism, is also captivated by the thought of simplicity bringing depth to ones mind.
For example, Thoreau wanting to learn the true meaning to living life states in Walden, "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life (235).” “Furthermore, Henry David Thoreau lives out two years of his life with simplicity and truth at Walden Pond. For instance, Thoreau states, “I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life (235).” Consequently, Henry David Thoreau believed nature could free an individual by forcing a person to develop individual thought. In order to achieve a happier existence, Thoreau responds to simplifying human presence on earth, while mastering self-reliance. Thoreau argues, “most of the luxuries, and many of the so-called comforts of life, are not only indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind.” Consequently, the author relates how simplicity is best compared to the technology that makes life seem simple, actually making life more complicated. Psychological and physiological necessities are what keep people pursing life, and luxuries hinder people from reaching full potential in life. Thoreau offers solutions to problems of lost souls living with the distractions of life within the realm. For example, the author states,
“Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say, let your affairs be as two or three, and not a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million count half a dozen, and keep your accounts on your thumb nail (144).” Henry David Thoreau desires people to concentrate on fewer issues that make one worry and to keep life as simple as conceivable. Thoreau also questions time within boundaries of life, by stating, “Time is but the stream I go a-fishing in. I drink at it; but while I drink I see the sandy bottom and detect how shallow it is (280)." Henry David Thoreau grows to understand life by focusing on the truth that time disappears quickly, so Thoreau spends his life connecting with nature to experience complete happiness. The purpose within writing Walden, Henry David Thoreau wished to inspire people to change their lives and live deliberately. While Lydia Maria Child and Henry David Thoreau equally share the ideas of achieving simplicity within the soul. However, Thoreau challenges individualism and the importance of self-reliance in contrast with social existence, through exemplifying his values of solitude in contrast with freedom. Henry David Thoreau wished for people to meet their lives and live them to the fullest, without devoting oneself to desperation brought upon by materialistic things, similar to the views of Lydia Maria Child.
People in modern day society should learn from past transcendentalists and engage in the concept of solitude. Henry David Thoreau and Chris McCandless were both transcendentalists that believed in the key fundamental idea of solitude. Henry Thoreau was a transcendentalist that practiced the form of solitude throughout his life. Later in his life, he left society and moved into woods to be alone. Henry David Thoreau wrote a book called, Walden where he recalled important lessons and ideas that his master Ralph Waldo Emerson taught him about transcendentalism. Along with Thoreau, a more modern-day transcendentalist was known as Chris McCandless. McCandless journeyed to the wilderness in Alaska to be able to experience a minimal amount of human
To Thoreau, life’s progress has halted. It seems people have confused progression with captivity driven by materialism. To Krakaeur, people are indifferent to pursing the sublime in nature. To Christopher McCandles the world around him is forgetting the purpose of life. People are blind to nature. In the eyes of these men the world is victim to commercial imprisonment. People live to achieve statuses that only exist because man made them. Fame, money, and monotonous relationships do not exist in nature; they are the pursuits of soulless fundamentalism. The truth is that people pursue meaningless goals, and people don’t want to hear or know how they are foolish. When exposed, reality is so unsettling that it seems wrong. Yet, to be free of the falseness in life is in essence the point of singularity that people realize if there is no truth in love then it is false, if there is no truth in money then it is worthless, if there is no truth in fame then it is undeserving. Without truth everything is a worthless pursuit of a meaningless glass ceiling.
on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have opposite ways of convicing you. Dr.
“Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!” once stated by Thoreau. Henry David Thoreau was a simple man with a simple life. He yearned for simplicity. He was a very wise man as well. In his piece of writing “ Where I Lived and What I Lived For” Thoreau explains a life of simplicity separated from the complexity of society. In “Where I Live and What I lived For” Thoreau most effectively appeals to pathos through the use of allusion, similes, and imagery.
Henry Thoreau uses specific rhetorical strategies in Walden to emanate his attitude towards life. With the use of many strategies Thoreau shows that life should be centered around Nature. People live their lives not ever taking a second glance of what Nature does and has done for humanity and Thoreau is trying to prove his point. Humanity owes Nature everything for without it humans would be nothing.
When you look at today’s government, it is viewed that everyone will be treated equally and decisions will be made in the best interest of the people. But when thinking about the government of the past, one must ask if these same views were expressed by the people of that time? Did everyone fill that they were apart of a just system? According to Frederick Douglass and Henry David Thoreau the answer to that question is no. The government was unjust because so many followed the wrong doings of the law rather than doing what was right, subjected African Americans to harsher punishments
Thoreau and Socrates start Civil Disobedience and Crito with basically the same premise. They both believe that humans are essentially moral beings. Thoreau says that people if left to their own ends will act justly, and should be treated accordingly by the law. Socrates says essentially the same thing, he says that "no one wants to commit injustice" for its own sake, many people end up doing so anyway. Socrates says that the citizens of a government have entered into an agreement to abide by its laws in exchange for protection. He also says that if one believes these laws to be unjust, one can always leave, but if one agrees to abide by the laws they have a duty to be subjected to punishment if they break these laws. Thoreau on the other hand says that it is the duty of the people not to abide by a law if they perceive it to be unjust, and if they claim to be opposed to it and nevertheless abide by it, they are a hypocrite.
To conclude, Thoreau believed that people should be ruled by conscience and that people should fight against injustice through non-violence according to “Civil Disobedience.” Besides, he believed that we should simplify our lives and take some time to learn our essence in the nature. Moreover, he deemed that tradition and money were unimportant as he demonstrated in his book, Walden. I suggested that people should learn from Thoreau to live deliberately and spend more time to go to the nature instead of watching television, playing computer games, and among other things, such that we could discover who we were and be endeavored to build foundations on our dreams.
Thoreau distinguishes what he wishes his life was; he compares what he wants out of life to what he currently has. He says “I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary.” He makes note of how dear and important life is, and how he wishes to live in a way which he hadn’t been before, by making the most out of the life he has left.
Throughout the essay from Walden by Henry David Thoreau he often refers to self reliance and simplicity throughout the essay. He believes that its important for an individual to live independently from
Henry David Thoreau was born in Concord, Massachusetts on July 12, 1817 and died there peacefully on May 6, 1862. He was described by Hawthorne as "ugly as sin." He loved nature, and his constant preoccupation was exploring the woods and ponds making detailed observations of plants and creatures. Henry led a singular life, never marrying, and marching to his own drummer, as he put it. From 1845 to 1847, he lived alone in a small cabin he built by Walden Pond near Concord. He described this unique experiment in natural living in "Walden" criticizing those who "lead lives of quiet desperation" with all the trappings of customary society. His personal independence and straightforward manner was harsh to some people, and he gained very little recognition during his lifetime.
Have you ever woke up in the morning and asked yourself, “Why am I living this life?” Throughout the book of Walden, Henry David Thoreau questions the lifestyles that people choose; he makes his readers wonder if they have chosen the kind of lifestyle that give them the greatest amount of happiness. Thoreau stated, “Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them().” This quote is important because most of society these days are so caught up in work and trying to make ends meet that they lose the values in life. Thoreau was forced to change his life when he found himself unhappy after a purchase for a farm fell through. On Thoreau’s journey he moves to Walden and builds a house and life from nothing but hard work, symbolizes many different objects.
...ing Henry David Thoreau into a prominent American Romantic writer. Such elements include his writings about life in Nature having great solitude; he became friends with the surrounding plants and animals. Secondly, he wrote about what was occurring day to day at Walden’s Pond which showed him as being individualistic. Moreover, there was the idea that God can only be found in nature, and pantheism was constant idea in his book. Finally, Thoreau wrote about intuition as a means of obtaining knowledge, and his use of senses as a tool for building intuition. These ideas time and time again show the various aspects of Thoreau being portrayed as an American Romantic which has lead to a great historical achievement as a writer that he well deserves.
With the statement, “Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them,” Thoreau is saying that many people in the world, including the United States, are not able to enjoy life because they are too preoccupied with working and earning wealth to buy unnecessary goods. Thoreau believes that men only need four things to survive: fuel, food, shelter, and clothing. However, according to Thoreau, people still strive to obtain more and more unnecessary material goods. To obtain these goods, Thoreau writes, “He has no time to be any thing but a machine,” meaning that men are so busy working to make excessive money that work consumes their entire lives. Thoreau, on the other hand, ignores “factitious cares” such as excessive wealth, furniture, and a large home, in order to enjoy his life and not be forced to live his life as a machine.
Henry David Thoreau implies that simplicity and nature are valuable to a person’s happiness in “Why I Went to the Woods”. An overall theme used in his work was the connection to one’s spiritual self. Thoreau believed that by being secluded in nature and away from society would allow one to connect with their inner self. Wordsworth and Thoreau imply the same idea that the simple pleasures in life are easily overlooked or ignored. Seeing the true beauty of nature allows oneself to rejuvenate their mentality and desires. When one allows, they can become closer to their spiritual selves. One of William Wordsworth’s popular pieces, “Tintern Abbey”, discusses the beauty and tranquility of nature. Wordsworth believed that when people