Comparing Logos And Ethos In Mark Antony's Speech

1072 Words3 Pages

There are many parts to a speech that make it powerful. The three main categories that can decide how good a speech is are logos, ethos, and pathos. Logos is a person's logic and reasoning behind their argument, ethos is the trust between the speaker and the crowd, and pathos is the emotion in a speech. All of these are important to helping a speech be as strong as possible and without them, a speech with a lot of potential can seem dull and unimportant. When comparing and contrasting speeches, these are some key components to look for. If we compared Martin Luther King Jr's “I Have a Dream”speech with Mark Antony’s speech in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Martin Luther King Jr's speech is more powerful because although they both had a firm belief that they deserved what they were protesting for, Martin Luther King Jr. had much more pathos, with emotional pauses and analogies.
In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony performs a very touching and successful speech. After the conspirators kill Caesar, Antony carries Caesar’s body out onto the steps of the senate house in front of the civilians of Rome. Before the speech, the people are happy that Caesar has been killed and are completely …show more content…

To start, Martin Luther King Jr referenced the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence which added reliability to his speech giving it more power. Another difference was how Martin Luther King Jr paused very often. While Mark Antony did pause, he did a few long pauses while Martin Luther King Jr had smaller but more numerous pauses. This allowed for more thinking on what he had just said which helped the people remember key points in his speech very clearly, which gave his speech a much more enduring effect. Finally, Mark Antony used props during his speech by holding up the evidence of the will, Caesar’s body, and Caesar’s robe to help him gain strength and this helped him be

Open Document