Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influences in American literature
Natural rights in american democracy
Early american literature puritains influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influences in American literature
Haider Qazi
Gregg Bergersen
HIST 1301
13 September, 2014
“John Locke vs. Thomas Jefferson”
John Locke's Second Treatise of Government and Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence are two of the most significant texts of all time. Many countries around the world have used these texts as the foundation for their declaration of independence. These authors laid the base for the knowledge of the State of Natural Rights of human being which is the establishing bases of our government. We can understand that The Second Treatise of Government and the Declaration of Independence are very identical in their message, which clearly substantiate Locke's work influenced Jefferson. Unpredictably as it is, Jefferson has been suspect over the times for plagiarizing John Locke.
The most significant similarity between both writings is that
…show more content…
they are strongly focused on the belief that all men are created equal and have the right to be happy in their life. Locke enlightens us that humans have natural rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of property. Jefferson restates this claim as absolute rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Simply both documents mention that no person is above or superior to another person and that everyone is equal. The natural law of man is not under the authority of man, but ruled by the Natural Laws. Also they state that those natural rights can't be taken away because humans are born with rights that are governed by natural laws and not by a government. The wordings in both of these writings are nearly identical in explaining these rights of Nature. The State of Nature is addressed by both authors in their documents. Both authors used the State of Nature as the source for their ideal government. Jefferson believed that if one set of government is not functioning appropriately under the State of Nature, then the people should separate from it and commence a new solitary, because this is what the Law of Nature enables them. Locke states that everyone is free under the State of Nature and under a government. However, if the government contravene the laws of nature then the government must be overthrown. Both Locke and Jefferson use the Law of Nature as the best style of government that could be achieved. Jefferson believes the people should be in charge and decide the government.
He says the people have the right to amend or eliminate the government and create a new one that will work in the best interests of them and protect their safety and pursuit of happiness. Locke states this idea, but in a different way. In his article he refers to this as the authority to penalize a crime, to protect mankind by having the authority to prevent something from occurrence. In other terms of this the public can modify, eliminate, or generate innovative laws and government.
In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson brings up many crimes that King George III committed not in favor of the colonies. 1One in particular, which was “He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.” Locke makes the point in his essay that we are not to ignore laws that need to be passed. If that law needs to be passed, then no person should keep it from passing. He makes it clear that what needs to be
done. The most important similarity in the two works is the call for representation in government. The idea that people rule the government through representatives is the basis for their ideas. This sparked both authors to write these works. The differences in their writings are very slim. Jefferson took straight from the Second Treatise of Government because it expressed exactly what the Declaration needed to say. In a sense, the first portion of the Declaration is just a summed up version of Locke’s article. However, John Locke went into extreme detail and gave reasons and purpose for his ideas. Jefferson stated in the simplest way the principles that the colonies wished to establish. Another difference is in the manner upon which they were written. Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence as a statement to establish just cause for the actions that the colonies were going to take. John Locke wrote his essay as an excuse of the Glorious Revolution, therefore, stated his view of the ideal government and how it is supposed to be governed. Although they have similar principles, they were written for different reasons. One difference is in the content. John Locke heavily addresses the right of property. The idea that if one puts labors into something, then that person owns it. Jefferson, however, never addresses this point in the Declaration. This would have strengthened the Declaration even more by claiming the colonists own their land because they work it. In conclusion, it is clear that “The Second Treatise of Government and the Declaration of Independence are based on the same ideology of equality, and these ideologies govern our people today. What these men wrote changed the world, its governments, and the way we think of our civil rights as human beings.
In Thomas Paine's Common Sense, there are some similarities and differences in the tone as compared to Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. Paine's approach to his work contrasts that of Jefferson's. However, they still use the same basic techniques to making their feelings known, which include examining the problem, giving reasons for why it is a problem, and offering their opinion on the solution. Jefferson's and Paine's difference in their tone is evident when examining who they are addressing the documents to, the overall layout of their documents, and the relative importance of the documents.
Thus as a result of Jefferson’s admiration of Locke the two documents share numerous similarities with one another. One of the common themes shared by both the Declaration of Independence and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government is the focus on natural rights of man. These rights include the fundamental belief that all men are created equal along and entitled to liberty. Locke however believed that men were also entitled to property along with men being created equal, and having liberty. These rights would allow the people to dissolve the government if there needs were not being fulfilled. Also as a result of all men being entitled to these rights Locke believed that violation of his conceptions of natural rights such as slavery was the result of struggle between authority and the governed. In contrast the Declaration list that man is given the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Omitting Locke’s belief that men are entitled to property rather than happiness. However despite this difference both documents share the belief that men should be
Thomas Jefferson wrote his Draft of the Declaration and was influenced by many of the ideas and concepts of John Locke. He did modify some of Locke’s ideas but most of them were the product of Locke’s belief in the Law’s of Nature and the fundamental unalienable rights of all human beings. As a result, their writings influence and demonstrate basic rights of people and make up our government. The world in which we live in is a product of the ideals of these men, who lived over 200 years ago; we are a representation of a republic
John Locke, one of the leading philosophers of the European Enlightenment was very important when it came to political thought in the United States. His ideas of the reasons, nature, and limits of the government became especially important in the development of the Constitution. In one of his most famous writings of that time, Two Treatises on Government (1689), Locke established a theory where personal liberty could coexist with political power ; meaning that the people would agree to obey the government and in return, the government would have the responsibility of respecting the people’s natural rights. In other words, he laid out a social contract theory that provided the philosophy and source of a governing author...
John Locke, Rousseau, and Napoleon all have very different views on what would make a good society. Locke uses a democracy/republican type view that many countries still model after today. Locke’s view on a happy society is the most open and kind to its people, out of the three. Rousseau takes the complete opposite stance from Locke in thinking a more dictatorship government would be what is best for society as a whole as what is good for one person is good for one’s society. Napoleon plays by his own rules with telling people he will follow Lockean like views only to really want to be an absolutist government under his own power. However, all of their ideas would work for a given society so long as they had a set of laws in place and citizens
Jefferson’s language in the Declaration of Independence shows clear influence from Locke and his theory of Life, Liberty, and Property. Locke’s idea of government is one that sets out to protect these rights and once a government becomes more destructive than useful it is the right of the people to dissolve the government and start over from scratch. It can be seen that Jefferson’s view of government, through his criticisms toward the British Parliament, are in direct alignment with Locke’s.
The American Declaration of Independence has affected the foundation of the United States more than any other event or document in American history. The Declaration of Independence was the basis for what the country was established on. The document was a way for the colonists to emancipate themselves from the cruelty of King George. This document had such an impacting effect because it was such a new way of bringing up concerns. It was the first of its kind in the history of America in the aspect of liberation of a group of people.
Compare and Contrast Declaration of Independence and Common Sense When I was asked to read the Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson and Common Sense by Thomas Paine, I was kind of scared. As I started to read it, I found it to be truly interesting. Reading over them several times to make sure I understood the text and the meaning of them both. Throughout, out this paper I will share many comparisons and contrasts between the Declaration of Independence and the Common Sense pamphlet. There are many reasons why these two documents had a great effect on the American Revolution.
The way that Jefferson structured The Declaration of Independence made the article extremely influential. Jefferson first starts by sharing his belief that governments and monarchies that do not represent the people. He then goes on to tell the rights that he believes all people should have all over the world. The rights he describes are simple and reasonable. From there his last line of that paragraph is “to prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid World.” Then he starts to describe the injustices done to the colonies by the English crown. His structure works well to persuade people because he does not start immediately accusing the king of all these injustices or with strong languages. Like all good speakers and authors, Jefferson starts off with a lightly worded statement about when a group of people should start a new government. He then transitions to a slightly stronger statement about human rights, and then he goes into his compelling injustices of the king. The injustices that he describes include “He has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the Lives of our People. The Declaration of Independence is...
Locke used the arguments that a government is nothing if it is not supported by the power of its citizens. He argued that the citizens of the government were not well represented in the government so it was justified to be overthrown. This is what he thought about the overthrowing of King James of England in 1688. Locke argued that if the people in a country were to dissolve then the government in that country will also dissolve. He saw a country as a big group of people with similar views. He talks about how society decides to act as a whole group. When they split apart is when society becomes different groups and the government then falls. Many colonists were from England and witnessed or knew about the Glorious revolution and felt like they were mistreated the same way the people of England did at that time. Locke’s ideas played a major role in influencing the colonists to realize they were not being treated fairly and they had a right to fight for freedom to create their own
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two political philosophers who are famous for their theories about the formation of the society and discussing man in his natural state.
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence for the American colonists to proclaim freedom from Great Britain's oppressor, King George III. American colonists had been suffering for many years when this important document was drafted. King George III had pushed the colonists into a state of tyranny and most decided it was time to start an independent nation under a different type of government. Jefferson focused his piece toward many audiences. He wanted not only King George III and the British Parliament to know the American's feelings, but also the entire world. The time had come for an immense change amongst the American colonists and Jefferson made sure everyone was aware of it by using his superior strategies of persuasion.
Locke states that in order for a civil society to be established, the individuals must forfeit some of their rights that they have in the state of nature. This needs to be done so everyone can live together in peace.
Rousseau was proud believer that all laws must guarantee liberty and equality to all citizens. He is known for the infamous writing “Social Contract” which foundation is based on “Man is born free, but is everywhere in chains.” In this quote he is stating that a man is free within a natural state, but when it comes to society he is enslaved. Thomas Jefferson looked to Rousseau for ways to handle things in society just as he looked to Locke. Jefferson decided to take this Rousseau’s words and apply it to The Declaration of Independence in the quote “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights. “Thomas Jefferson observed Rousseau’s “Social Contract” to gain justification to address colonial claims in The Declaration of Independence. For example , Rousseau decided to state “. “So soon as we disobey without impunity, disobedience becomes legitimate. And, since the Mightiest is always right, it merely remains for us to become possessed of Might.” In this previous quote, Rousseau means that the people higher than citizens are never wrong , but if the people are wrong then punishment comes along. Jefferson takes this statement and turns into “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a
The turmoil of the 1600's and the desire for more fair forms of government combined to set the stage for new ideas about sovereignty. Locke wrote many influential political pieces, such as The Second Treatise of Government, which included the proposal for a legislative branch of government that would be selected by the people. Rousseau supported a direct form of democracy in which the people control the sovereignty. (how would the people control the sovereignty??) Sovereignty is the supremacy or authority of rule. Locke and Rousseau both bring up valid points about how a government should be divided and how sovereignty should be addressed.