Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in the middle ages
Gender roles in the middle ages
Gender norms devience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in the middle ages
Camelot 3000 and Queer Theory
Queer Theory is the idea that our identity is generated from fluid components and heteronormative society suppresses the fluidity of these components forcing those who identify as queer to rebel against heteronormative society. This suppression of fluidity and rebellion of heteronormative identity is prevalent throughout Camelot 3000. Isolde is the figure piece for everything queer and goes against any form of heteronormative identity. She is a woman who loves a man trapped in a woman’s body. Isolde’s love for Tristan transcends his physical sex as she sees him as he sees himself. Tristan is a woman who sees himself as a man and Isolde’s love goes against the heteronormative view that she must continue to
…show more content…
love a male body. Her appearance also hints at queerness, as she does not present herself within the norms of the time. Her hair and clothing suggest a push away from any established custom.
The mix of her appearance between male and female designated hairstyles and odd costumes exemplifies the nature of her rebellion against a heteronormative society. Isolde’s queerness is rarely confined to normal panels; instead, she overwhelms the borders of the panels. This insinuates a type of counterculture to what society follows by defying any norm. Her queerness works as a destructive force in heteronormative order. As Isolde arrives and meets Tristan once again, she makes him question everything and long for his male body again. This swirl of emotion causes him to almost destroy the round table. This can be seen as a metaphor regarding how queer theory’s purpose is to overturn the established order of heteronormative thinking. Queer theory stands to defy what is perceived to be ‘normal’ by deviating from any established heteronormative standard within society. Isolde’s queerness draws from her refusal to bend to society’s norms. Consequently, her queerness helps destroy the heteronormative identity that was preventing Tristan from embracing his love for her. Isolde’s queerness in avertedly shatters the boundaries within sexuality, by establishing a fluid spectrum of sexuality …show more content…
unconcerned with societal norms. Isolde’s queer unconditional love for Tristan disrupts what is perceived to be ‘normal’ by demonstrating that gender holds no authority over love.
When Isolde first meets Tristan eye to eye again, she professes her concern for his safety as if nothing mattered and their love remained as it always was. Her queerness can be seen through the page as she is not featured in a panel and simply exists outside the bounds of rational and conservative panels just like her love for Tristan (Camelot 3000 Chapter 6 p. 24). There is a diagonal line in the background illustrating the dynamic and changing force that Isolde’s love represents. Isolde’s love for Tristan is a major disruption of the established heteronormative identity. This is a defiance of heteronormative identity, while everyone views Tristan as a woman now; Isolde acknowledges Tristan as the man he sees himself as. This is a clear rebellion to the heteronormative standard, but it also demonstrates the benefits of a love that bypasses all norms and is true only to the person inside regardless of gender. At first Tristan’s love for Isolde is overshadowed for his self-hatred of not physically being a man. He must first come to terms with his queerness instead of attempting to become ‘normal’ by fitting into a heteronormative standard in which Isolde helps him break out of and find
self-acceptance. Isolde’s appearance is a symbol of queerness, which causes her to be in contrast with society’s heteronormative composition. The manner in which she portrays herself falls in line with her attitude as they both disregard the established norms of society. In one panel we see her kissing Tristan while carrying flowers in her braids and wearing non-standard clothing (Camelot 300 Chapter 7 p. 7). Her hairstyle does not conform to any gender specific hairstyles; it transitions from a Mohawk that is stereotypical of men to braids with flowers that represent a feminine characteristics. This odd assortment of hairstyles presents itself as queer by disrupting the heteronormative ideal of a woman’s hairstyle. Isolde’s refusal to abide by heteronormative ideals of appearance or sexuality places her at odds with society. However, her clothing, although odd and out of touch with society still conveys her as a woman. She wears short skirts at times or thongs with high-heeled boots. This demonstrates that even though her hairstyle and love might not conform to society her clothing fall in line with the suggestive undertones of women’s clothing in heteronormative society. Thus showing that some aspects of her persona embody queerness, but not all of her is pushing the idea of rebelling against what is perceived to be heteronormative. However, queer theory does not require you to rebel against every aspect of the heteronormative order. The fact that she disrupts societal norms advances queer theory. Her characterization shows that queerness does not mean she cannot hold feminine characteristics while exhibiting queerness in her appearance and her romantic life. Isolde’s inability to fit inside panels represents the conservative and rational nature of heteronormative society that she refuses to comply with. Her non-conformity to heteronormative standards is hinted since her biggest appearances are outside the panels. In the panel or lack of panel where she is embracing Tristan the small slanted panels represent queerness (Camelot 3000 Chapter 12 p.28). These panels lack color and do not follow any pattern; instead they show what appears to be an intense panel of passion labeled as lesbian sex. Most characters occasionally fall out of line with the panels hinting that they too embody some aspects of queerness. However, Isolde embodies queerness because she constantly defies heteronormative and heterosexual norms by existing in non-panels and overlapping existing panels. Her appearance in non-panels is indicative of her queerness, since the panels act as metaphor for heteronormative norms. Tristan’s self-loathing, however, at times stands in the way of this as a pillar of heteronormative society, but Isolde’s love manages to transform that self-loathing into love. She does this by shattering the pillar of heteronormative society through her persistent demonstration of queer love. Isolde is the embodiment of queer theory because she represents a person whose identity is ever evolving to what she feels and does not conform to any standard or norm. Her love for Tristan surpasses any heteronormative standard that society might attempt to impose on her. She loves him for the man who he sees himself as despite the fact that he feels trapped inside a woman’s body. This love is queer because it doesn’t follow societies’ view instead it pushes against society's heteronormative perception of what love should be. The fact that her appearance goes against the fashions of a heteronormative female indicates Isolde’s queerness. She is demonstrating that she is neither of societies’ intended genders instead following her own queer path. A final observation of her queerness comes from her portrayal in the comic panels or lack there of. Isolde rarely fits inside the panels always over lapping and transgressing across the rational and conservative borders that make up the panels. Her queerness acts as a destabilization of everything in the heteronormative world because her sole presence causes Tristan to become engulfed by his emotions that almost lead to the destruction of the round table.
The film presents the stereotypical behavior of gay men that is evident in our society. Many of the costumes are designed to highlight the characters and the way they live. For example, Bernadette wears long flowing clothes usually white or an off cream. ‘She’ is an older ‘women’ and dresses to look like one with flowing skirts and tops with her hair done up simply.
... homosexual being felt in the world around the 1970’s and 1980’s. The time period in which this play was written was one of great dissonance to the LGBT movement. For Harvey Fierstein to be so bold and public with his own lifestyle was truly admirable and brave. Fierstein shows us that ignorance can destroy a life because of what is unknown.
homosexual liberation. Some have demonstrated their anger and concerns about prejudice against homosexuals in both riots and artistic forms. Therefore, these people seek to prove to the heterosexual world that homosexual ‘deviancy’ was a myth.
First, no matter what is represented on stage, the fact that boys are actually playing cross dressing men and women is insistently metaphorical; the literal fact of trans-vestism (that is, the boy actor impersonating either a woman, a woman cross dressed as a man, or a man cross dressed as a woman, not the represented character) is divided between the homoerotic and the blurring of gender. On the other hand, the represented female character who cross dresses functions literally to relieve the boy actor, at least for a time, from impersonating a woman. Represented characters who cross dress may pre-sent a variety of poses, from the misogynist mockery of the feminine to the adroitly and openly homoerotic. In the case of the title character of Jonson's Epicoene, the motif is utilized as disguise intended to effect a surprise ending for Morose and his heterosexual audience, for whom the poet also pr...
Tristan makes himself into the perfectly chivalric knight. This is the view from the outside, however, he is clever and cunning outwitting the King to pursue his love. Iseult is the wife of King Mark, Tristan’s uncle, and Lord. Tristan and Iseult both individually owe complete loyalty to King Mark. At the end of any competition, it is customary to give something
By knowing Stephen’s thoughts, readers also know definitively that in some ways, Stephen feels like a man and wishes she was one, such as when she asks her father if he thinks she could become a man if she prays hard enough (19). Thus, some readers will consider the possibility that Stephen is in some ways more than a cisgender (a person who identifies with the gender they were assigned at birth, or whose sex and gender match) lesbian woman; in today’s terminology she might be transgender, non-binary (not a part of the gender binary of male or female), or even genderfluid (going back and forth between male and female or other genders). Stephen subverts of gender norms, as in some ways she also subverts what many think of as a lesbian character. Her feelings and society’s norms at the time lead her to think that because she is attracted to women, perhaps she was meant to be a man (because attraction to women is an attribute innate to men). For readers today almost ninety years later, seeing a character like Stephen who shares so many of the same feelings, reservations, worries, and even self-doubt about love and identity reminds us that people of the
Judith Butler’s concept of gender performativity suggests that there is a distinction between “sex, as a biological facticity, and gender, as the cultural interpretation or signification of that facticity” (Butler, 522). Performing certain actions that society associates with a specific gender marks you as that gender. In this way, gender is socially constructed. Alfar defines the societal expectation of women as the “constant and unquestioning feminine compliance with the desires of the masculine” (114). Considering Macbeth from a modern perspective and taking this distinction into account, it is necessary to determine if the play is concerned with sex or with gender. Before the action of the play even begins, the audience is warned that “Fair is foul, and foul is fair” (1.1.11). The first scene of the play casts the world of Macbeth as a land where everything is opposite or disordered. This line at the very start of the play cautions audiences to not take the play at face value because things are not always as they appear to be. Because of this, “all the binaries become complicated, divisions blurred. Thus the binary nature of gender identities, male/female, is eliminated” (Reaves 14). In the world of Macbeth, the typical gender constructions are manipulated and atypical. If the play does not deal with sex, the qualities of Lady Macbeth cannot be applied to all women but rather, representative of society’s construction of gender, “the patriarch, and the limited, restrictive roles of women” (Reaves 11). Within this reading of Lady Macbeth, Shakespeare’s examination and questioning of gender construction allows modern day readers to recognize the enduring relevance of
...e seen in a less stringent sense than the infidelity that is skyrocketing in many marriages of today. Iseult has not vowed to love King Mark, but she was only given away as a prize to the king because, "for the love of King Mark, did Tristan conquer the Queen of the Hair of Gold" (367). Honestly, there should not be serious consequences for Tristan and Iseult in the same way that the Clintons had to endure the outcomes of an unfaithful spouse. Both Tristan and Iseult reacted against the religious code of being faithful to King Mark, while they burned with passions for each other. Closely analyzing this scenario, the reader of this story would have sympathy for Tristan and Iseult as "star-crossed lovers," to use the language of William Shakespeare in Romeo and Juliet.
What the parodies do to the figure of Geraldine is of particular interest. There are many answers to who and what she is. Some, following the conventions of Gothic romance suggest a "fairy tale" resolution which re-establishes the hetero-sexual order (Christabel marries her far away lover) and the supernatural and mysterious Geraldine is expelled.
"The androgynous woman literally incorporates the independence that the male was designed to exemplify prior to the introduction of woman, but the male who depends on a woman becomes effeminate and is perceived as missing something in the outline of maleness," (Rose, 25). While in the forest of Ardenne, Rosalind is dressing in and taking on the male persona.
When Shakespeare reveals his true identity as a cross-dresser to Tristan, Tristan does not judge him. Instead, Tristan embraces Shakespeare’s true self and encourages Shakespeare to be himself all the time, even though if Tristan did tell people he would be highly looked upon for ruining Shakespeare’s reputation. Tristan cares about Shakespeare’s well-being, which causes Tristan to ignore any personal advantage he would gain from outing Shakespeare. Shakespeare thanks Tristan by teaching him new skills. When Shakespeare teaches Tristan how to sword fight and gives Tristan a new look, Tristan does not let his new look go to his head, because Tristan gains a new respect for Shakespeare in the process. Tristan does not abandon Shakespeare after he gained something from staying on Shakespeare’s ship, because a friendship is more important than benefits in Tristan’s eyes. When Shakespeare attends Tristan’s crowning ceremony in Stormhold at the end of Stardust, it is because Tristan’s selflessness preserved he and Shakespeare’s
Critic Sarah Rose Cole (2012) disagrees with Nunokawa (1991) by saying we should not view homosexual and heterosexual identities as two binary opposites, where one must arise after the other as a sign of mental growth. She says that instead of beginning with male friendship and then ending in heterosexual marriage, the poems trajectory focuses solely on male to male relations. According to Cole (2012), Tennyson is emphasizing that male relations and heterosexual romance can work parallel to each other; simultaneously: “First love, first friendship, equal powers, / That marry with the virgin heart” (LXXXV. 107-108). Instead of distinguishing them from one another Tennyson portrays “both same-sex “friendship” and cross-sex “love” as passions that “marry with” the heart” (Cole 62). So rather than homosexuality, emphasis is put on male friendship. It is being suggested to us that rather than view homosexual and heterosexual relationships as being opposed to each other, we should see them as “simultaneous and identical”, as it “not only associates male friendship with marriage, but subordinates marriage to male-male relations”
As Tamsin Wilton explains in her piece, “Which One’s the Man? The Heterosexualisation of Lesbian Sex,” society has fronted that heterosexuality, or desire for the opposite sex, is the norm. However, the reason behind why this is the case is left out. Rather, Wilton claims that “heterosexual desire is [an] eroticised power difference [because] heterosexual desire originates in the power relationship between men and women” (161). This social struggle for power forces the majority of individuals into male-female based relationships because most women are unable to overcome the oppressive cycle society has led them into. Whereas heterosexual relationships are made up of the male (the oppressor) and the female (the victim who is unable to fight against the oppressor), homosexual relationships involve two or more individuals that have been freed from their oppressor-oppressed roles.
When Offred and Ofglen take their first walk, they come upon the Wall. Hung up there are two men labeled “gender traitors”. These men were most likely gay or bisexual, and were having relations with each other. This act is unacceptable to this society; having gay sex feminizes the men performing the act, and a feminine man is worthless in this society. So worthless that the law breakers are put to death instead of separated, berated, or gently punished.
This quote addresses directly the primary difficulty of the issue. The terms gay and lesbian are useful in literature in that they allow a group of people who have been marginalised and even persecuted to become visible. They enable a way of life and a set of identities, harmonious or conflicting, to be presented, to be questioned, to be understood and accepted. As categories they create ‘space’ in which there may develop a more evolved understanding of texts and they also create a genre within which many lesbian and gay writers are comfortable with being placed. A gendered reading of a text can reveal undercurrents and depths which might otherwise not be apparent. These categories also make ‘space’ for the author within the text which leads to a closer tie between the author and the reader in the reading process.