Comparing Gilgamesh And Code Of Hammurabi

537 Words2 Pages

Mesopotamia is an ancient greek land that was “a collection of varied cultures whose only real bonds were their script, their gods, and their attitude toward women” (Mark “Mesopotamia” 1). The Epic of Gilgamesh is a story of a man named Gilgamesh who is two thirds God and one third man. The story was written by the Sumerian people in 2,000 B.C, the intended audience being regular people and elites alike (Mark “Mesopotamia” 1). Code of Hammurabi is similar to the Epic of Gilgamesh as both served a purpose in their respective times to guide people in their values and morals.
Gilgamesh is the ruler of the Mesopotamian city of Uruk and is “unbridled in his arrogance” (Li “Week 2 - Mesopotamia”). Although physically godly, he oppressed the average population in the city …show more content…

The people of Uruk plead to the Gods for help, so the Gods gave them Enkidu. Enkidu was a man equally as brilliant as Gilgamesh; physically God like as well. However, Enkidu was a wild man due to the fact that he was raised by animals. Enkidu becomes human after sleeping with a woman, in turn, he was rejected by the animal world. After some time, Enkidu travels to Uruk to challenge Gilgamesh after hearing of his actions. After fighting, the two men became friends. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the distinction between class and value are apparent. Gilgamesh is idolized primarily for his God status. He is not idolized for his treatment of women or other city dwellers as it his actions are distasteful. The emphasis on the ranking of class a character has shows the reader that class was a

Open Document