Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to compare and contrast two creation myths
Comparing myths and relgions of creation
Creation myths and how they are similar and different
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to compare and contrast two creation myths
In the Hebrew Story of "Creation and the Fall of Man- Genesis 1-3," and book "Mythology," by Edith Hamilton, both mentions on how evil came into this world. They may come from two different religion beliefs; however they both tell the basic idea of who was responsible for evil but the plot is changed. There are many similarities between Edith and the Hebrew bible’s story. For instance, in the Hebrew story they have a woman named Eve and in Hamilton, it’s Pandora. They are the first women to be created and serve a purpose to be alive. Although, the two served a different purpose as to why they were alive, they were both a gift to man to accompany them. Furthermore, in the bible it mentioned, ‘The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to …show more content…
How evil was entered into the worlds was that in Hamilton’s book, it came from a box while evil entered when Eve took a bite from the forbidden fruit. Moreover, Eve was intentionally made to be good unlike Pandora who was created to bring misfortune upon men. However, their attributes were different from one another, for the serpent said to Eve, ‘“You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. ‘“For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil,”’ (NIV, Gen. 3) which Eve blindly took his word for it, falling for his trick. Pandora, on the other hand, was full of curiosity leading her to break the rule Zeus had warned her about and opened the evil box. Other than the women, the Lord God in the bible was the creator of man and women, but in Hamilton Prometheus is the creator of man and Zeus had the idea to create a mortal woman. Also, hope was trapped in the box forever leading for mankind to lack optimism, but in the bible hope was never trapped for it was there to aid mankind. Hence, evil came into the world in many different ways and purposes. To sum it up, both stories were written from a diverse culture which leads to the beliefs in ancient times to be contrast. Both had the same idea of having reasonable beliefs of how the world came to be, however based on who wrote the story will have variety of events. Such as gods creating what, the purpose why things happened, the people doing it intentionally and not and so forth. Overall, the creation of mankind all started from a great ruler who slowly progressed their way into making earth from good to its
An Analysis of Peter van Inwagen’s The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy
While reading different stories, you can find many similarities between the texts. For example, Romeo and Juliet and Pyramus and Thisbe are two stories that have many similarities. Throughout the story, the characters have many of the same traits. Similar events take place in the two stories. All these events lead both stories to a tragic ending. Stories can be similar in many ways. The characters, the setting, and the story line itself. Stories can also be very different. One may talk about an event that will break your heart, while another might bring a smile to your face. The two stories The Man to Send Rain Clouds and Old Man at the Temple have many similarities and differences in their settings due to the place, time, and culture.
Eve does exactly what God commanded her to not do. Now that I have explained the main things a bout both stories I will continue by discussing the main themes and symbols that are existent in both stories.
John Steinbeck includes more of the tale of Genesis: 4 than is actually told in the bible. The basis of this is a Jewish story involving twin sisters of both Cain and Abel. The two disputed over Abel’s twin whom Abel was to marry. Cain murdered Abel and wed the twin sister of his brother (Fonterose, Joseph. p.3380). The story differs also in that it is Abel who leaves his home instead of Cain. Abel found his Eden, represented by Salinas Valley, but lost it after fathering a second generation very similar to the first, Caleb representing Cain and Aron representing Abel (Fonterose, Joseph. p.3379). The story is changed by Steinbeck to illustrate the idea that men naturally have both good and evil tendencies within them, and that this mixture compels men to choose between the two. The story told is similar to an alternate interpretation of Genesis: 4 called timshel. This alternate reading introduces the idea that Cain feels evil and kills Abel because of the jealousy he feels towards his brother and God’s love for Abel (Levant, Howard. p.243).
The problem of evil is a difficult objection to contend with for theists. Indeed, major crises of faith can occur after observing or experiencing the wide variety and depths of suffering in the world. It also stands that these “evils” of suffering call into question the existence of an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God of the Judeo-Christian tradition. The “greater good defense” tries to account for some of the issues presented, but still has flaws of its own.
In John Perry's book Dialogue on Good, Evil and the Existence of God, he used three characters in the dialogue in order to clarify the positions of the three characters (Weirob, Miller, and Cohen), the arguments they provide in support their positions and the "end state" of their discussion. This allows us to examine our understanding of the good, evil and the existence of God.
In both myths the relationship between humans and nature is shown as a positive one but with negative effects from humans’ greed and necessity for more. In the beginning of the Creation Story it is stated in the first few lines “And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” God then began to create the Earth in seven days. On the first day he created day and night out of the darkness and light. The second day led to the creation of the sky. The third day was the creation of the land. The fourth day led to the creation of the season. And finally on the fifth and sixth day, animals and humans were created, and the first two were a male and female named Adam and Eve. At the end of everyday during creation the words “and God saw it was good” are written. God is happy with his creation of nature. The phrase shows the positive connotation of...
Good, is portrayed by God, and evil seems to be what fate has in store for the
Has evil always been around, or did man create it? One could trace evil all the way back to Adam and Eve; however, evil came to them, but it was not in them. When did evil become part of a person? No one knows, but evil has been around for a long time and unfortunately is discovered by everyone. In many great classics in literature evil is at the heart or the theme of the novel, including Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird. This classic book demonstrates the growing up of two children in the South and illustrates the theme of evil by showing how they discover, how they deal, and how they reconcile themselves to the evils they experience.
The creation myths that I have studied are similar in many ways. They also have differences that show an inherently different way of thinking about the world. All have creators-gods that make the world into what is now. There are conflicts within their world, and these conflicts change the face world. God to god or human to god maybe be involved in these conflicts. Their bloody struggles prove who is more powerful, causing change in the control of the world. Some gods are beneficial to man and others are self-serving, using man only as a tool.
Since God is perfect, he could not have created evil. Rather, the origins of evil date back to Adam and Eve. Satan, a fallen angel, managed to tempt Eve into eating the forbidden fruit; thus introducing evil into the world. One may wonder why God, whom is omnipotent, decided not to eradicate evil from the world. The answer is straightforward. When God created man, he gave him free will due to his immeasurable love. As a result, the introduction of evil into the world gave man a choice; to follow God and pursue righteousness, or pursue evil and henceforth separate oneself from
The desire to do good is oftentimes easily distracted by the constant temptation to perpetrate evil. Ideas of good and evil, however, stand highly subjective; in other words, what may not offend one person may seriously affect another. The contrast between good and evil is prevalent in the values of a multitude of cultures and societies, yet each culture and religion depicts good and evil differently. For example, Christians portray good and evil through God and his angels and Satan and his sinners. These portrayals of good and evil undergo an evolution as time progresses. Both Paradise Lost by John Milton and Canto XXXIV of the Inferno by Dante Alighieri display evil through Satan. The two writers effortlessly distinguish the conflict between
God is the source of evil. He created natural evil, and gave humans the ability to do moral evil by giving them a free will. However, had he not given people free will, then their actions would not be good or evil; nor could God reward or punish man for his actions since they had no choice in what to do. Therefore, by giving humans choice and free will, God allowed humanity to decide whether to reward themselves with temporary physical goods, and suffer in the long run from unhappiness, or forsake bodily pleasures for eternal happiness.
The presence of evil has been a conflicting view amidst various philosophers dating back thousands of years. With the belief in God across the world, an essential question arises: Since God is claimed to be omniscient, omnipotent, and all-loving, then how can there be evil in the world? Augustine of Hippo, a preeminent philosopher who was born in Algeria, North Africa in 354, had attempted to expound this significant contradiction. In 360, Augustine followed the religion of Manichaeism, which was founded by a Persian man named Mani. They believed that humankind, being a byproduct of the devil, was inherently evil and, therefore, not culpable for evil in the world. With the belief that humans were capable of free will, Augustine ultimately broke ties with the Manichaeans. Human beings as one entity of body and soul were made good by the almighty God and with their free will were able to cause evil phenomenons to occur, which rules out the idea that God is the cause of evil. Peter Kreeft was one that agreed with the ideals of Augustine and offered an answer to why God created the possibility of evil.
It is impossible to deny the existence of evil in the world as we as human beings experience pain and suffering every day. It is generally accepted that there are two different types of evil – natural (based on God) and moral (based on humans). Moral evil is caused by human beings and occurs when humans inflict suffering on other people like September 11th, world wars, the Holocaust and other human related travesties. We also inflict evil on animals with testing or hunting for game not using the animals as God intended for fur or food. Humans also have obliterated the environment with pollution, destroying the rainforests and the way we litter and think nothing of it.