More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences and similarities between dulce et decorum est and the charge of the light brigade
Differences between dulce et decorum est and the charge of the light brigade
Similarities in The Charge of the Light Brigade and Dulce Et Decorum Est
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing Dulce et Decorum Est with The Charge of The Light Brigade
The poems I am going to compare and contrast are "Dulce et Decorum
Est" by Wilfred Owen and "The Charge of The Light Brigade" by the Poet
Laureate of his time, Lord Tennyson. These poems both have a main
subject of war. The main difference though, which leads to many other
differences in the two poems are that they were written very in
different centuries and times.
This time difference meant approaches to war were different and hence
the tones of the poems are very dissimilar. Owen is responding
directly to a poem written by Jessie Pope. He was outraged at the tone
of her poem. Pope was encouraging people to go to war and fight for
their country in with a glorified tone and ironically she was unaware
about the atmosphere of the war. Owen, who was a soldier and fought on
the front line during the war, had a very different attitude to
fighting. He includes vivid descriptions of events throughout battles,
and felt as though war was a waste of young, innocent lives. However
in Tennyson's "The Charge of The Light Brigade" his attitude is very
unlike Owen's. Tennyson sounds heroic and gallant, proud to be at war.
This is partly because Owen's point of view was written from first
hand experience where as Tennyson didn't attend the Battle of
Balaclava (the battle his poem was based on) and so only heard
glorified reports of the event.
The rhyming in "Dulce et Decorum Est" is surprisingly more regular
(ABAB rhyming scheme) than Lord Tennyson's "The Charge of The Light
Brigade". Despite this, the rhymes are not the major feature of the
poem and so does not stand out as...
... middle of paper ...
...rand and gallant movement. The men's
uniforms and swords are described as "flash"-ing, continuing the
glorious, glittering attitude of the cavalry. Throughout the poem, no
mention of blood and suffering is mentioned as in "Dulce et Decorum
Est" because the aim of the poem is very different to his. Tennyson
was reporting as duty, being Poet Laureate of his time, making the
people interested feel proud and happy about the events "blunder".
Personally I prefer "Dulce et Decorum Est". This is because I agree
with Owen and his attitude to war, it being an unnecessary waste of
lives, young and old. I also dislike the rhythm and rhyming patterns
used in "The Charge of The Light Brigade", it seems so shallow and
meaningless, whereas in Owen's poem the phrases and subtle rhyming
portrays a deeper and more meaningful attitude.
The first poem we are going to look at is ‘The Charge of the Light
Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen and Seaman, 1941 by Molly Holden both present different interpretations or views on war. These different views will have a variety of impact on the reader. The two poems also have several recognizable similarities, which connects them both together. There are many factors to be considered when comparing the similarities and differences between these poems, such as perspective, imagery, time period, etc. These, and many more, will be looked at and analysed in this essay.
In this essay you will notice the differences and similarities between ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’. ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ was written in nineteenth century by Alfred Lord Tennyson. In contrast, ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ was written in the twentieth century by Wilfred Owen. The main similarity we have observed is that they both capture war time experiences. However, the poets’ present these events using their own style, and the effect is two completely different observations of war.
“Dulce Et Decorum Est” is a World War One poem written by Wilfred Owen, to express the dreadfulness of war and that no glory awaits men.
The two poems I will be comparing and contrasting are ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen along with ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ by Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Wilfred Owen wrote his poem in the duration of the World War one, the poem was first published in the 1920’s. Owens imagery shown in the poem is repulsive and presenting an ugly side of war, the language used by the poet is fierce. On the other hand Lord Tennyson wrote the poem at some point in the Battle of Balaclava in the 1854 however, Lord Tennyson has a diverse vision on war due to not understanding how war was, his imagery demonstrates a calm slow story explaining how he thought war would be. Both poems are similar however they tell there stories in different ways.
On the first read-through of Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est it seems to just be a poem describing a soldiers experience in World War I, but there is much more to the story than that. Through the use of several literary techniques, Owen is able to vividly describe the speaker’s experiences and at the same time make them relatable to the people reading the poem. He also is able to criticize the people who he thinks are at least partly responsible for “tricking” a younger, more gullible him into the situation in the first place.
all young people may think it is a honour to die for your country, but
All exceptional poetry displays a good use of figurative language, imagery, and diction. Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est" is a powerful antiwar poem which takes place on a battlefield during World War I. Through dramatic use of imagery, metaphors, and diction, he clearly states his theme that war is terrible and horrific.
Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” and E. E Cummings’, “next to of course god america i” are poems that critique patriotic propaganda. Both poems use words and images to effectively depict the influence that patriotic propaganda has on war. “Dulce et Decorum Est” uses descriptive words to create realistic images of the horrors soldiers are faced with during combat, whereas “next to of course god america i” uses sarcasm to inform readers that the abuse of propaganda can be used to manipulate others. The attitudes they convey are quite similar; both suggest that propaganda is a lie; it is not sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.
Comparing two war poems written by Wilfred Owen: Dulce et decorum Est. and Anthem for Doomed Youth. In this essay I will be comparing two war poems written by Wilfred Owen: ‘Dulce et decorum Est’ and ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’. By Comparing the two I will be able to distinguish the fact that Wilfred Owen is very anti-propaganda and that's why he feels so strongly about this. The two poems have many similarities but also a fair amount of differences, which I will be discussing in this essay.
Wilfred Owen emphasises the condition of the men in order to show the reader the effect that the war had on the soldiers. He often compares the young soldiers to elderly people:
To conclude this essay, with regards to all of the analysis above, I have concluded that Owens poem shows how cruel war is in our time but Shakespeare's speech is mainly to inspire and motivate whether Owen's poem is to inform about the reality and the harshness of war it self. Owen has experienced the war personally and is so able to write about it in detail hence the similes and the metaphors. However due to the fact the Shakespeare has no experience in war itself, he would have to improvise and make up some limes.
Dulce et Decorum Est In Wilfred Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” the speaker’s argument against whether there is true honor in dying for ones country in World War I contradicts the old Latin saying, Dulce et Decorum Est, which translated means, “it is sweet and honorable to die for the fatherland”; which is exemplified through Owen’s use of title, diction, metaphor and simile, imagery, and structure throughout the entirety of the poem. The first device used by Owen in the poem is without a doubt the title, which he uses to establish the opposing side of the argument in the poem. The poem is titled, “Dulce et Decorum Est”, which comes from Horace’s Odes, book three, line 13, and translated into English to mean: “It is sweet and honorable to die for the fatherland”. With this title it would seem as if the Owen himself condones the patriotic propaganda that resulted in the deaths of young men in World War I, tallying upwards of hundreds of thousands.
The Soldier by Rupert Brooke, and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen are two poems which were written during the First World War, and both being written about this conflict, they share the same theme of war poetry. However, the two poems deal very differently with the subject of war, resulting in two very different pieces of writing.
How Wilfred Owen Uses Language and Imagery in His Poetry to Communicate his Attitudes of War