Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Though there are many similarities and differences between the epic stories of Beowulf and The Epic of Gilgamesh, there is a generalized statement that can encompass what this essay is trying to achieve in just one sentence. Two brave, epic heroes both partake on a journey seeking glory, but want different outcomes. Beowulf is venturing for fame and the unending respect and love he would receive from those he saves while Gilgamesh aims for a more prized turnout; immortality. Not only do the characters want different outcomes, but they partake on their journey in completely different fashions. Beowulf is willing to take on any challenge or battle by himself without fear while Gilgamesh utilizes a companion at all times and is fearful of death; …show more content…
hence his immense longing for immortality. Although the protagonists of two very different stories would be seemingly incomparable, Beowulf and Gilgamesh can be compared and contrasted effectively. One word that would perfectly describe both characters’ journey would be epic.
Throughout both stories the protagonists are doing heroic deeds and winning legendary battles, certainly setting them apart from the average person and therefore making them epic. Both Beowulf and Gilgamesh are epic, but in their own ways. Beowulf utilizes a unique fighting strategy of using his bare hands to take down a series of enemies with monster-like characteristics to save the people of the Gales. He seeks glory and uses his bravery and strength to achieve it through his eventual death. Gilgamesh is classified as epic through a different method of characterization. First of all, Gilgamesh’s journey took place in a completely different setting in Mesopotamia. Secondly, Gilgamesh isn’t respected like Beowulf and isn’t as strong as he uses weapons instead of his bare hands. Lastly, there is one final difference between Beowulf and Gilgamesh in terms of being epic. This is the fact that Beowulf dies and Gilgamesh doesn’t die during his story. Although he never reaches immortality, Gilgamesh can be deemed more epic because of his ability to stay alive, whether it was due to his own doing or …show more content…
not. There is no disputing that Gilgamesh and Beowulf are both epic heroes, but they differ greatly in their beliefs. They are similar in the beliefs that there is no afterlife. While this holds Gilgamesh back, Beowulf embraces it and wants to make his life as memorable as possible. They are different in the aspect that Beowulf believed it was righteous to help others and Gilgamesh seemed to only care for himself. Beowulf also believe God had a part in his survival and possibly even caused him to stay alive. Gilgamesh, on the other hand, believed his life was completely in his own hands and his fate was up to him. Nobody was helping him stay alive and this led to more fear. Overall, Beowulf is represented as a Godly character with good morals and a strong will. Gilgamesh is represented as a selfish character with bad morals and is ultimately searching for the wrong thing. What would an epic hero be without his or her epic flaws?
Throughout history, pieces of literature featuring epic heroes always include a major flaw in the seemingly perfect character. Whether this is to keep the story interesting or add a touch of realism to the piece, every epic character has an important flaw. In comparing and contrasting the flaws of Beowulf and Gilgamesh, we notice both startling similarities and differences. In being similar, Beowulf and Gilgamesh have both been caught bragging or boasting to their followers. To some, this is not so much a flaw as much as it is a characteristic but boasting is seen by many as negative. Both characters can also come off as cocky or arrogant because they are aware of their achievements, giving them confidence which leads to arrogance. Although similar, Gilgamesh seems to have more character flaws as he exercises his power much more, he is more selfish, and more conceited than Beowulf to a noticeable
extent. It may seem like Beowulf and Gilgamesh cannot be compared in any way but it is actually quite possible to compare and contrast these two characters effectively. It is obvious that both characters are epic heroes who go on their own journeys to seek glory. However, it is not obvious what the goal is of each character. Through a set of different beliefs and character flaws, it is determined that Beowulf seeks glory and fame while Gilgamesh seeks eternal life through immortality. All in all, the protagonists of the stories of Beowulf and The Epic of Gilgamesh can be effectively compared and contrasted.
When deciphering between what it considered to be heroic or monstrous, it is important to keep in mind the angle in which a story is being told. While reading Beowulf, the protagonist of the epic poem could be considered either heroic or monstrous through the eyes of different characters. Beowulf can be classified as a hero according to The Hero’s Journey through the eyes of Hrothgar and Hygelac. On the other hand, Beowulf could be viewed as being monstrous according to Monster Theory through the eyes of Unferth and Grendel’s Mother.
In the poem Beowulf, which Seamus Heaney translates to modern English, the character Beowulf bravely conquers all enemies thrown at him, including sea monsters and other perilous creatures. This allows him to gain fame throughout Geatish and Danish lands. His righteous deeds cause the previous heir, Hygelac, to appoint Beowulf to king before he dies, and Beowulf bravely leads his country until he perishes protecting it. On the other hand, in The Last Kingdom, by Bernard Cornwell, the Danes capture a young English boy by the name of Uhtred, and integrate him into their war driven society. Uhtred learns various battle tactics by general Ubba, whose ruthlessness in battle grants him fame and riches. When Uhtred goes back to the English,
What is hero? A hero, under the Merriam-Webster definition, is a person who is admired for brave/great acts or fine qualities. This is a very broad definition that combines both ancient and modern belief of what --or who-- a hero should be. Beowulf is an epic poem that focuses on an Anglo-Saxon hero. As such he embodies the traits that his culture valued most. Deadpool, on the other hand, portrays the most recent ideas of what traits a hero should embody. With these examples from contrasting periods, we are still able to see similarities and differences that shows how modern and Anglo-Saxon idea of heroism reflects its culture.
This essay is the comparison between Beowulf and a modern day hero. I consider any American soldier to be my modern day hero. In this essay I will explain in three paragraphs of how my modern day hero is like Beowulf. With in these three paragraphs I will go over how they are both fighting for a good cause, how they are both rewarded for what they do, and how they are both treated with much respect.
In Beowulf, the essence left behind by a true hero is extremely important. In epics such as this one, leaders tend to have the determination and boldness of a hero. On the other hand, the main character, Beowulf, does not only display these certain traits. In this heroic poem, respect and trust come naturally. Honor and integrity are present throughout the poem. There are many moments in Beowulf that manifest the many traits that a person should have. This proves how important these attributes are to the characters and the Anglo-Saxon society. Although Beowulf has no known author, it embodies many of the beliefs and morals of the early Germanic society. The author of this epic poem uses many approaches in order to demonstrate that respect and trust are fundamental characteristics of a leader and hero.
Merriam- Webster online dictionary defines an epic hero as, “ A grand and noble character in an epic poem, admired for great achievements or effected by grand events.” The same dictionary also defines an epic poem as, “a story told about a hero or exciting events.” The Epic of Gilgamesh is often considered the oldest story on earth; which would make Gilgamesh, the story’s controversial main character, and the world’s oldest epic hero. This epic set a precedent for all epics to follow; it displayed most of the traits that society commonly perceives an epic hero and epic poem should have. The Epic of Gilgamesh exhibits tendencies of an epic poem through its inclusion of an epic hero, multiple gods and goddesses, and it’s vast array of settings across the world. Additionally, Gilgamesh presents attributes of an epic hero through his quest for immortality, his noble birth and his battles with superhuman foes.
Both Beowulf and Gilgamesh make for great representatives of the term “epic hero” by showing near legendary levels of greatness, might, and strength. However, their differences are significant enough that one can clearly
known in the Bible as Erech (now Warka, Iraq). According to the myth, the gods
Reading through Beowulf I began to compare it to the last great epic I read, Homer’s Odyssey. While the Odyssey and Beowulf are each examples of both historic and modern ideas of heroism, the acts of Beowulf’s hero seem to fit better within its context.
Many diverse cultures exist across the globe, differing in several aspects, such as beliefs, practices, and values. An example of two cultures that demonstrate dissimilar values are Ancient Anglo-Saxon and Ancient Mesopotamian. These two cultures are known to have expressed opposing heroic values. Two texts that can be accurately used in this comparison are Beowulf, an Ancient Anglo-Saxon text, and The Epic of Gilgamesh, an Ancient Mesopotamian text.
Erika Mercado Essay 2 Modern Heroes: Dante vs Beowulf A modern hero is a good-hearted person with these attributes: bravery, strong, and contributes to saving the lives of his homelands. Beowulf demonstrates the characteristics of a modern hero: a leader, fearless, and generous. Beowulf is a young hero whose character exerts powerful strength in battles. Dante the Pilgrim does not display hero attributes in The Inferno.
Beowulf and Song of Roland consists of similar themes, war and fighting respectively. In Beowulf, the fight was between a man and a beast, which is assessed to be a dragon. Similarly, in the song of Roland, the clash was between two armies. At the terminus of the article, Beowulf and the song of Roland, both face a tragic ending. The warriors die due to their arrogance and ill logical way of cerebrating. However, in Beowulf, the hero destroyed his life due to inadequate weapons. In addition, none of his companions stepped forward, when they witnessed the weapons failing to hit the target. But, in the song of Roland, the knight gave his life after all his partners and Oliver died. To recapitulate, the readings has a through report of the war
An epic hero according to Anglo-Saxon literature is a hero who is larger-than-life; someone with self-confidence, great strength, and the qualities of loyalty, bravery, and honor. Beowulf can be considered an epic hero for multiple reasons throughout “Beowulf.” Beowulf is a character constructed on all of the Anglo-Saxon epic hero qualifications. For starters, Beowulf is seen as a noble character, that is willing to provide security for the people by risking his own life. As a character, Beowulf conducts superhuman strength, and can complete impossible tasks. These are only some among many other reasons and characteristics Beowulf can be classified as an epic hero.
At the start of both stories, the protagonists are quite similar. The Beowulf from the epic boasts with every new person he introduces himself. This shows that he is very confident and arrogant. This Beowulf is willing to slay beasts in the name of glory without deciding for himself
The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey both are held in high respect by literature analysts and historians alike for the characterization of the hero and his companion, the imagery brought to mind when one of them is read, and the impressive length in relation to the time period it was written in. The similarities that these two epics share do not end with only those three; in fact, the comparability of these works extend to even the information on the author and the archetypes used. However, The Odyssey and The Epic of Gilgamesh contrast from one another in their writing styles, character details, and main ideas. Both epics weave together a story of a lost man who must find his way, but the path of their stories contrast from one another.