Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of animals in our life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Animals play a large role in our lives whether they are pets seen in nature and many other ways, but what is their purpose? Two poems that answer this question are, Animal Wisdom written by Nancy Wood, and The Last Wolf written by Mary TallMountain. Both poet’s attitudes about animals are alike because they both think that animals are smarter than people. In Animal Wisdom Nancy Wood states, “When they realized they had something in common people began saying the same things. They defended the Earth together though it was the animals who insisted on keeping their own names.” This shows that the poet thinks that animals are smarter than people because they found the purpose of the world and taught the people. The animals also knew that it would be a big mistake to join people and that they should remain separated. In the Last Wolf, Mary TallMountain states, “I know what they have done.” This shows that animals are smarter than people because humans have destroyed the Earth and the animals are ne except for one wolf. The animals knew that they Earth must be protected but humans didn’t care. …show more content…
In Animal Wisdom, the imagery is of animals being created and learning about the world. In the Last Wolf the imagery is of a single wolf running through a dark and dirty city while the world is being destroyed. The differences in the imagery of Animal Wisdom are that happy and bright images are thought of, many animals are seen, and the characters in the poem are happy. In the poem, The Last Wolf, dark images are imagined, only one animal is seen, and the characters in the poem are
Margaret Wise Brown was truly fascinated by animals, and she understood children’s attraction to animals. Tellingly, when Brown reflects on her childhood she mentions her “thirty-six rabbits, two squirrels…a collie dog, and two Peruvian hens, a Belgian hare, seven fish, and a wild robin who came back every spring” (Days Before Now). From this information about Brown, one understands where her love of animals originated--her childhood. Additionally, animals were kind to her and did not restrict or belittle Brown the way some individuals did regularly. Brown was allowed to have constant interaction with animals, which proved to be influential in her writing career. Overall, Margaret Wise Brown used numerous animals, especially rabbits because of her love for creatures and the understanding she possessed of children’s love of and interest with animals.
It has been said that the wolf is one of the most voracious and horrifying animals that exist in nature today. But, in all reality, is that actually true? One is unable to make an assumption such as this without a firsthand experience, or so that is expressed in In The Shadow of a Rainbow and Never Cry Wolf. Authors Robert Franklin Leslie and Farley Mowat make every attempt to convey the true nature of the wolf throughout their journeys, as they prove claims falsely accusing wolves, with documented evidence of complete vigilance. These works of literary nonfiction effectively refute anti-wolf claims made within them through being dangerous to the wildlife, dangerous to humans, and viciousness.
In order words, Nature is beautiful in the more simple way, but at the same time if nature starts to recognize danger or the feeling of dying, she will defend herself. Humanity need the use of ethics and humility at the same time in order to have a good ecological environment. During “Thinking Like A Mountain” Leopold describes the intricate of a mountain’s biomes and the consequences of disturbing their ecological balances, describe specifically with a wolf and a deer. Leopold use the wolf and the deer as an example of how human treats nature. Referring to the wolf way of think, “he has not learned to think like a mountain” like humanity has not learned to think in the way that Mother Nature want us to think (140). Leopold describes how “a land, ethic, reflects the existence of an ecological conscience, and… Reflects a conviction of individual responsibility for the health of the land” giving an exact example by having a group A and a group B (258). Group A describes what one needs when on the other hand, group B “worries about a whole series of biotic side-issues” (259). By having this two groups being described, humanity today is like the group A, when one really need to change their way of mind and start to be like the group B. Society needs to use the ethics with humility in order to conserve the health of the natural
all the hunted animals convey connotations of evil, and this is doubtless the reason why the author of the poem seems so involved in the outcome of the hunts and never tires of triumphantly describing the final slaying of the pursued animals. (Howard 85)
In the poem by Joy Harjo called “Eagle Poem,” Harjo talks about prayer and life and how they revolve around mother-nature. She suggests that while being one with nature, we feel we are in a place in which we haven’t imagined and the things in which we would love to do in that magnificent and calming place. After one reads the poem, he/she enjoys the lyrical type of it. This is because “Eagle Poem” sticks to one idea and extends it throughout the entire poem. For instance, it talks about prayer, nature, and animals from start to finish.
Most people will never see a grey wolf but they live in many different kinds of places. A grey wolf’s range covers most of North America. Grey Wolves got their name because they have thick grey fur. Wolves prefer to eat animals with hooves and smaller animals like muskrats. The grey wolf is a fascinating creature to study.
The poem “Traveling through the Dark” by William Stafford portrays the events of a speaker who must hurriedly dispose of a deceased deer. Before disposing of the body, the speaker notices the deer is pregnant and undergoes an ethical dilemma before ultimately getting rid of the carcass. In the poem “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kumin, numerous woodchucks are causing crop damage on the speaker’s farm. The speaker undergoes systematic killing of the woodchucks to rid the problem. Both of these poems describe the relationship between the speaker and animals. However, the two speakers view animals in a very contrasting manner. The speaker in “Traveling through the Dark” cares for the well-being of animals while the speaker in “Woodchucks”has no regard for animal life. Stafford and Humin reveal these opposing viewpoints through literary devices such as diction, tone, and imagery.
The interjections and short phrases he uses, like “Fetch? “Catch?” or “oh joy” seem abrupt and distracted, much as the dog is distracted and taken away by the world around it. The control and power that the hawk feels and seeks over its world is in stark contrast with the dog’s fascinations and distracted thinking.The tones of the two poems, developed through diction and imagery, vary greatly from one another and contribute to further contrast among the perspectives of a hawk and a dog. The tone of “Hawk Roosting” can be described as concise. Clear and straightforward choices of diction like “I kill,” “assert my right,” and “eyes closed” are unmistakable and show the hawk’s clarity. The images that Hughes shows from the perspective of the hawk include those of nature, comparatively small from the bird’s high point of view: “rough bark,” “revolve it all slowly,” “the sun is behind me.” The clear and controlled diction and the images from nature that Hughes employs contribute to a concise tone from the hawk’s point of view, which shows the control that the animal has over its own actions and the way that it feels that same power over the larger world. The tone of the passage “Golden Retrievals” is dissimilarly very
It is universally acknowledged that all creatures on Earth fare by survival of the fittest. In the case of “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kumin and “Traveling Through the Dark”by William Stafford, the power dynamic of human and animal is illustrated. Each speaker encounters animals, and approaches their situation with a different attitude but identical decision. The speaker in “Woodchucks”, a farmer, is struggling with a Woodchuck infestation and resolves to shooting the woodchucks on the farm one by one. Meanwhile, the speaker in “Traveling Through the Dark” is conflicted about what should be done with a dead pregnant deer left on a empty road, and whether he should push her off the cliff to avoid any future accidents. In the two poems, each of the
When humans and nature come together, they either coexist harmoniously because nature's inhabitants and humans share a mutual respect and understanding for each other, or they clash because humans attempt to control and force their ways of life on nature. The poems, "The Bull Moose" by Alden Nowlan, "The Panther" by Rainer Maria Rilke, "Walking the Dog" by Howard Nemerov, and "The Fish" by Elizabeth Bishop, describe what happens when humans and nature come together. I believe that when humans and nature come together they either clash and conflict because individuals destroy and attempt to control nature, which is a reflection of their powerful need to control themselves, or humans live peacefully with nature because not only do they admire and respect nature, but also they can see themselves in nature.
While reading “Thinking like a Mountain” by Aldo Leopold, published in 1986, and “Landscape Use and Movements of Wolves in Relation To Livestock in a Wildland-Agriculture Matrix” by Chavez and Gese which was a piece from The Journal of Wildlife Management, published in 2006, I have become interested in investigating the question of how wolves interact with livestock. In Leopold’s article he explains how humans are taking away the role of wolves. He explains how when humans hunt animals, they are taking away the wolves role within the environment. His whole article is a personification because he gives the mountain feelings, which we know they do not have feelings. Leopold wants the audience to think and feel how the environment does. In his article he also explains how the wolves interact with the cattle. I am researching how wolves affect the livestock on farms. My second article, by Chavez and Gese, is about expanding the wolf range in Minnesota. Chavez and Gese’s
The film Wolf, starring Jack Nicolson, Michelle Phieffer, and James Spader is one of my very favorite films. I consider it a horror/ suspense film. Which made choosing either Fargo or The King's Speech a tough decision. I chose The King's Speech. Will Randall, an editor at a publishing house in New York, is bitten by a wolf on his way back from meeting with a client in New England.
Wordsworth and Hopkins both present the reader with a poem conveying the theme of nature. Nature in its variety be it from something as simple as streaked or multicolored skies, long fields and valleys, to things more complex like animals, are all gifts we take for granted. Some never realize the truth of what they are missing by keeping themselves indoors fixating on the loneliness and vacancy of their lives and not on what beauty currently surrounds them. Others tend to relate themselves more to the fact that these lovely gifts are from God and should be praised because of the way his gifts have uplifted our human spirit. Each writer gives us their own ideals as how to find and appreciate nature’s true gifts.
Armbruster, K. (2002). “Good Dog”: The stories we tell about our canine companions and what they mean for humans and other animals, 38 (4), 351, 26. Retrieved from http://www.siue.edu/PLL/
A lion with the ability of critical thought can relay an important allegorical message that RCK’s and Sansloys behaviors alone may not. Similarly, a goal-oriented and cruel hyena immediately can bring up notions that the actions of the witch’s son or Sir Satyrane on their own may be insufficent to express. The lion both reveals RCK’s mistakes and shows how men can behave like beasts as compared to Sansloy. Moreover, the hyena reveals the insidious intentions of the witch’s son, and the problematic motives of the knightly Sir Satyrane. These animals serve as both a representation of animal symbolism and as agent characters that are able to take action within the plot and allegory of the poem.