Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The charge of the light brigade by alfred tennyson
What does alfred lord tennyson show about the power in charge of the light brigade
The charge of the light brigade by alfred tennyson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Compare and contrast Tennyson's The Charge of the Light Brigade with
Kipling's The Last of the Light Brigade.
Tennyson and Kipling both wrote the story of the Light Brigade who
fought in the Crimean war, in the battle of Balaclava. This battle
took place between the English and the Russians in Eastern Europe on
the 25th October 1854.
Lord Alfred Tennyson wrote his poem also in 1854, just after the
battle had ended, and his aim was to build national pride in the
hearts of the English people, and to " Honour the charge they made."
Tennyson wanted to boost the moral of the English people because of
the Light Brigades defeat. Tennyson wanted to change the feeling of
defeat, to one of heroism, and to show that the Light Brigade were in
fact brave to go up against the " Jaws of death" with only "six
hundred men."
Kipling on the other hand, who wrote his poem in 1891, 37 years after
the battle had ended, saw how the Soldiers were living in poverty and
wanted to make the public feel guilty for abandoning the soldiers when
they needed support the most. Kipling wrote the poem as a response to
Tennyson's poem, and refers to Tennyson as being the "Master singer."
Kipling also tries to shed a reality on the battle, and how the
English were loyal to the soldiers when they were need, but now that
the battle is over the broken soldiers returning no longer fit the
heroic image the public hold, and so their country no longer cares. In
fact exposing the publics expressed support to be only shallow lip
service.
Tennyson wrote his poem with rigid, rhythmical, and evocative
language, and tries to glamorise the Battle, and in doing so, makes
the poem too fanciful.
While Kipling on the other hand wrote his poem using...
... middle of paper ...
...their lack of fidelity towards the soldiers.
In conclusion I personally find Kipling's poem more effective. I find
this because although Tennyson tries to make people feel a sense of
national pride, the battle took place because of an error, and they
the English people were massacred. They were brave because they knew
they were committing suicide, but they went anyway. This makes them
very brave, and quite foolish, but not heroes.
On the other hand, Kipling is angry, and disgusted with the English
people's fake loyalty because they only needed the soldier when they
were fighting, now the battle is over they are just get in the way.
Kipling sheds a reality on the lives of the soldiers now, but sets his
poem out like a story, which is very clever.
Kipling only wanted justice to be served, and for the English to see
how they had treated their "Heroes."
The first poem we are going to look at is ‘The Charge of the Light
“The Soldier” written by Rupert Brooke in 1914 is a pro-war poem to express the bravery of soldiers going to war and fighting for their nation. Brooke's poems use of extended metaphors “Earth a richer dust.” Is used to explain that when a brave soldier dies the ground will forever hold its value. This allows him to convey his message of bravery by fighting for your nation because the earth will forever be grateful of your brave actions. He also uses personification “A dust who England bore, shaped aware,” To compare England to a mother as it gave life to the soldier and molded the
Posttraumatic stress disorder is a psychological disorder that occurs after a person has been through a traumatic event, such as combat warfare. In this essay, I would like to compare Vietnam soldiers to soldiers in the Trojan War, and contrast the similarities and differences between the two, also analyze how soldiers’ lives have been affected similarly throughout two completely different wars. I would also like to show the irony of war, and how war doesn’t only dehumanize soldiers, but it also inspires valuable human qualities. In the movie Achilles in Vietnam, Dr. Shay does a great job by showing us how the psychological devastation of Vietnam veterans compares to the one Achilles experienced after losing his beloved comrade, Patroclus.
In the Crucible, we are introduced to the main protagonist John Proctor; the way that Arthur Miller presents him by rebelling against the authority in Salem. Out of the entire town he is the only person that speaks out, realising that the authority is unfair and unjust; he is not like everyone else in the town who keeps quiet to themselves. There are many situations where we the readers can see very clear examples of him rebelling against the authority that controlled Salem. One example of Proctor rebelling against authority in Salem was when he did not go to church on a Sabbath day and instead decided to pray in his own home ‘Mr Proctor, your house is not a church; your theology must tell you that’. That is one clear example of him rebelling
Yan Martel and William Blake described the tiger’s appearance, soul, and creation similarly. Both authors felt that tigers are fierce, strong, majestic and so on, however they also said how fearful tigers are.
The themes of the two poems are portrayed in very distinctive ways. ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ explains in a majestic approach, that fighting in war is something every soldier should honour. The poem is also about the loyalty of the soldiers, not the bad luck or foolishness of men. Tennyson presents this in his poem to show the bravery of the soldiers, although, he only highlights on the benefits of war.
Bao Ninh's The Sorrow of War is a contrapuntal reading to American literature on the Vietnam War. But rather than stand in stark contrast to Tim O' Brien's The Things They Carried, The Sorrow of War is strangely similar, yet different at the same time. From a post-colonialist standpoint, one must take in account both works to get an accurate image of the war. The Sorrow of War is an excellent counterpoint because it is truthful. Tim O' Brien writes: ". . . you can tell a true war story by its absolute and uncompromising allegiance to obscenity and evil." (O' Brien, 42) Bao Ninh succeeds in this respect. And it was for this reason that the Vietnamese government initially banned The Sorrow of War. A thorough textual and historical examination of both the war and post-war experience of Vietnam reveals that its experience was similar to, if not worse than, that of America.
Lord Tennyson celebrates the glory of his six hundred brave soldiers who went into battle knowing they would be dead once the war was over. The first verse starts of in action as the chief officer, sends an order for all soldiers to
Between the two authors, Hemingway and Eliot, a similar idea shows through their writing, connecting them. They both use the common aspect of negative tone to reflect how after being in a war, the purpose that used to drive one’s life grows pointless and irrelevant. In the text of “A Soldier’s Home,” Krebs tells his mother “I don’t love anybody,”(Hemingway) which shows the audience the bitterness which he has attained. One may assume this aggravation comes from war due to Kreb’s mother’s surprise at finding this new attribute. Like “Soldier's Home”, “The Hollow Men” by TS Eliot has an indignant tone that shows the negative responses one returning from war has of their surroundings. Eliot shows the melancholy of his text while saying “our dried
Ballad of a Soldier was a movie that was accepted worldwide, even the United States, and critically acclaimed to be an astounding movie that shows a softer side of Soviet Russia. The movie was released in 1959, at this time censorship, although not completely, was loosened. This loosened reign of censorship was due to the fact that Stalin was dead and no longer in power. Many works still had to be government-approved. The movie is set during WWII, but doesn’t really focus on it throughout the movie, except the first ten minutes.
As poet laureate and patriot, Alfred, Lord Tennyson was very influential in 19th century England. He successfully showed the ignorance of the English Army leaders while still reflecting his strong nationalist views in an attempt to create propaganda for the Crimean War in his poem, “The Charge of the Light Brigade.” The charge was a tragic incident that took place in 1854 during the Crimean War, which was England, France and Sardinia against Russia, when English Army generals blundered and sent over six hundred soldiers on a charge that was destined for disaster. The solders were known as the Light Brigade and the charge resulted in over two hundred deaths to soldiers and over three hundred deaths to horses. In this horrific aftermath, Tennyson responded to this event by writing a poem which went on to become a classic. Tennyson was a strong nationalist and very political. He was moved and troubled when he received news of the tragic charge. The poem became a form of propaganda for the Crimean War due to Tennyson glorifying the sacrifice of the soldiers by using his exceptional writing skills. Although this poem is regarded by many as propaganda, he included the word blunder in the poem which showed the ignorance of the Army leaders.
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
Poetry played a vital role in the dissemination of information during the Crusade period. It provided a compact, easily memorized way of spreading news in a time bereft of the benefit of mass printing. According to Michael Routledge, who penned a chapter on Crusade songs and poetry in The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades, poetry was not only a way of recording and spreading news of current events, but also served to record and extoll the virtues and values of the ruling Medieval aristocracy. These values included commitment to one's lord, and an acceptance of the feudal duties of auxilium (armed help in time of attack by enemies) and consilium (counsel and rendering of justice) (Routledge 97). A fine example of poetry's use in the above context can be found in Paul Blackburn's translation of the medieval Spanish epic Poem of the Cid. The poem is a fictional account of the life of the eleventh-century adventurer and military commander Rodrigo Diaz de Vivar. The poem's title derives from Rodrigo Diaz de Vivar's Arabic title, Sayyidi (the Cid) or "My Lord". The poem's content describes a series of events transpiring after the main character, the Cid, is exiled from his homeland. Within the body of the poem, situations extolling the medieval virtues of commitment to one's lord, auxilium, and consilium are revealed. The theme of commitment to one's lord is prevalent throughout the Poem of the Cid. Initially, the Cid is exiled because his enemies have turned his lord, King Alfonso, against him. Despite being banished from his home and family, the Cid uses every opportunity that comes his way to show his valor and loyalty to Alfonso. In reality, being exiled should have turned a man li...
There are many things in this world that are impossible to understand without first hand experience.This can be especially irritating for people who have the knowledge, but see everyone else with the wrong idea. Philip Larkin and Wilfred Owen show this in their poems about the common misconception of war glorification. Through imagery and the use of similes, they explain what it's really like for a person to go into battle. To outsiders, fighting in war is a noble cause worthy of envy and praise, but from the inside perspective the only thing war does is take away the innocence of
George Gordon Byron, better known as Lord Byron, was a leading British poet in the eighteenth century. He is well known for his influence on the Romantic Movement that originated in the eighteenth century. He is mostly known for his scandalous affairs and eccentric way of life. Lord Byron was born on January 22, 1788 to Catherine Gordon, an impoverished Scots heiress, and Captain John ("Mad Jack") Byron, a fortune-hunting widower. It wasn’t until he was 10 years old that he inherited the title of Lord Byron from his great-uncle, the "Wicked" fifth Lord Byron. The title of Lord is typically given formally to a baron in England. In 1801-1805, he attended Harrow School in London, where he experienced his first sexual encounters with males and females. It is also during this time that he fell madly in love with a distant cousin of his, Mary Chaworth. The fact that she was engaged did not deter Lord Byron as his love and passion for her made their way into his poems, "Hills of Annesley" (1805), "The Adieu" (1807), "Stanzas to a Lady on Leaving England" (1809), and "The Dream" (1816). Years later, he recounted that all his "fables about the celestial nature of women" stemmed from "the perfection" his imagination created in Mary Chaworth. Lord Byron began to attend Trinity College from October 1805 until July 1808, where he received a Master of Arts degree. During "the most romantic period of [his] life," he engaged himself with many sexual affairs and activities such as boxing, horse riding, and gambling. He was living well beyond his means and started to accumulate such a debt which haunted him for years. (Lord Byron (George Gordon) (Lord Bryon - Biography)