In “The Gift of The Magi” and “Blues Ain't no Mockingbird”, both stories characters are poor but have very different thoughts on that matter and different methods of how they live their lifestyle. Their reasons for being poor are also different because in “The Gift of The Magi”, the story is set during the depression and in “Blues Ain’t no Mockingbird”, the family is poor because they are black and during that time there were very strong racial tensions. The characters in both stories are very motivated by their love for each other or their family. In “Gift of the Magi” this is shown through gifts the husband and wife give to each other. In “Blues Ain’t No Mockingbird”, the “Granny and Grandaddy” show love for their family by defending their home from a selfish uncaring production crew who came to film the family and to exploit them. The major evidence in “Gift of the Magi” is when …show more content…
the couple buy something for one another and by unfortunate fate sell the one thing that works with what the other one bought. In “Blues Ain’t No Mockingbird” the grandaddy protects his family by taking action against the camera men by actually breaking a camera to make his point clear. This proves my point that the characters in both stories are motivated by love for the other person or family. In “GIft of the Magi”, the love is shown through gifts that were bought using the little money both of them had at that time.
The money was acquired by them selling their most precious items. Dell sold her hair and Jim sold his watch. Unfortunately both of them bought a gift that was supposed to go with one another’s most precious item. Dell bought a watch fob to go with Jim’s pocket watch and Jim bought a tortoiseshell comb for Della's hair. You also must remember that the reason that the gift options were so limited was because they were very poor and didn’t have many expensive things. This may be evident why both chose to sell that one thing was because it was all they had. This act of love is described as selfless love towards someone. One last point that is very important to make is the fact that they both still loved their presents. This is shown when it is said, “but she hugged them to her bosom, and at a length she was able to look up with dim eyes and a smile and say: “My hair grows so fast, Jim!”(464) The next topic is the way love is portrayed in “Blues Ain’t No
Mockingbird”. Love in “Blues Ain’t No Mockingbird” is very different from “Gift of the Magi” in both context and what the love’s objective is to show protection for the family. The two main characters and protagonists are exploited by a very selfish and racist production crew that only cares about showing the world the poverty that black people had to deal with back then. In the beginning of the story, granny tries to get rid of the cameramen but can’t. Near the end of the story Granddaddy Cain comes and seems absolutely insane when he is described as having “rocks all in his jaw” (501). Next he comes out of the forest and pins some hawks to a door. This intimidates the cameramen like crazy and to make sure they got his point he after that breaks the camera and ruins the film because it was exposed to the sunlight. This insane example of “protection” shows just how far this man will go to protect the family he loves. This may also be a bit of a problem because this intense motivation may not always be the best cure for every issue. Some other traits that were said in the beginning were that this family didn’t like getting pushed around and they also valued their privacy. this is completely understandable as they shouldn’t be bothered by random cameramen who just came on their property just to annoy them.
“[T]here is one way in this country in which all men are created equal- there is one human institution that makes a pauper the equal of a Rockefeller; the stupid man the equal of an Einstein, and the ignorant man the equal of any college president. That institution, gentlemen, is a court” (Lee 233). These are the words uttered by Atticus Finch, an important character in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Atticus is a lawyer, and at this point in the novel, he is trying to defend Tom Robinson, a black man who was accused of raping a white woman. This reflects upon how society was in the 1930’s, when the color of your skin affected your chances of winning a trial. In fact, it is speculated that To Kill a Mockingbird is loosely based off of the trials of the Scottsboro Boys, a famous case from this time period. Most of the main characters associated with both trials share similar traits, experiences, and backgrounds.
In this scene, a Mad Rabid dog, named Tim Johnson, comes through the streets of a the town of Maycomb.
Poverty can be a terrible thing. It can shape who you are for better or for worse. Although it may seem awful while you experience it, poverty is never permanent. In Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird, which takes place in Alabama in the middle of the Great Depression, Walter Cunningham and Burris Ewell are both in a similar economic state. Both of their families have very little money; however, they way they manage handle themselves is very different. In this essay, I will compare Walter Cunningham and Burris Ewell’s physical appearance and hygiene, their views on education, and their manners and personalities.
Beyond buzzing courtrooms of segregated townspeople and skies raining ashes reeking of kerosene, Harper Lee’s Atticus Finch (To Kill A Mockingbird), and Ray Bradbury’s Guy Montag (Fahrenheit 451) are both sui generis characters in their own stories because of their shared similarities deeper than eyes, ears, and noses. From their burning passions for knowledge and literature to their patient, unbiased hearts, the two men shake their communities to new realizations. Their idiosyncrasies made the relentless lawyer and runaway fireman standout in a society where laws are governed by people blinded in the bliss of oblivion.
There are many differences between the book; To Kill a Mockingbird and the movie. Some differences are easy to spot and some aren’t. Many things that are in the book aren’t in the movie. Many of these things you don’t need, but are crucial to the plot of the book. Movies and books have differences and similarities, but many things in books MUST be included in the movie.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a phenomenal book that portrays life in the South during the 1930’s. This poverty stricken time, in which many struggled to get through, seemed to never grow dull by the means of the Finch family. Harper Lee’s award winning book was captured in a film containing the same title. Although the movie was in black and white and average in length, it lived up to the vivid story depicted within many pages. This worldwide hit reached many minds, but it is up to the people to decide which one is better: the book or the movie.
The story To Kill A Mockingbird has a wide variety of characters and situations that make it an all-time favorite. The ever-growing popularity of this story has caused a movie version, based on the book, to be showcased. There are noticeable differences between the two that could change the entire feel of the story. The omitted scenes from the book, that are never shown in the movie, include: Jem and Scout going to church with Calpurnia, the school scene in which the Ewells, Cunninghams, and Scout’s teacher and classmates are introduced and talked about, and how Aunt Alexandra, the great influencer of the children in the book, never appears in the movie along with other Finch family members.
In this essay I will discuss three overarching topics and the differences and similarities they show between the film "A Time to Kill" which stars Samuel L. Jackson and Matthew McConaughey and the novel To Kill a Mockingbird which is written by Harper Lee. These overarching topics will be racial prejudice, justice, and morality. I will discuss racial prejudice's role in the court proceedings as well as state what would have occured had Carl Lee and Tom Robinson been white. In the section about justice I will discuss how the outcomes would have occured in real life had both men been judged based on crimes they actually commited and been judged by the law with no extenuating circumstances or racial prejudices affecting the verdict. I will discuss these themes using examples that have Nathan Radley and Tom Robinson from To Kill a Mockingbird and Carl Lee Hailey from "A Time to Kill".
In both books, there are examples of girls who come from white families below the poverty line. Mayella Ewell from To Kill A Mockingbird lives in the dirty, rural part of Maycomb county with her crude siblings and abusive father. Everyone who lives there knows that “Maycomb's Ewells lived behind the town garbage dump.“ (227). They’re too poverty-stricken to live in a respectable community or even somewhere clean. It’s nearly the same way where Celia Foote comes from. By far, Celia comes from the poorest background out of all the characters in The Help. When Aibileen finds out from Celia that she grew up in a poor, Mississippi town called Sugar Ditch, she comments on how “Sugar ditch is as low as you can go in Mississippi, maybe in the whole United States...even the white kids looked like they hadn’t had a meal for a week.” (39). Her statement on how the white children even looked hungry, implies that the black people living in Mississippi aren’t prosperous, but growing up in a town like Sugar Ditch a...
To Kill A Mockingbird is a heroic tale of leadership and courage during racial times. In the novel To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Atticus, To, Jem and Scout are unfortunately exposed to a really racist and prejudiced society and town. Which ends up causing them to lose a case and really confuse Jem and Scout when they are young. In Harper Lee’s novel To Kill A Mockingbird, it uses characterization to help show a theme of loss of innocence when people are exposed to surprising and unfair situations.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
A Time to Kill and To Kill a Mockingbird both have a number of similarities to be compared and contrasted. Both stories can be compared in their themes about justice and racial prejudice. However, this is where the similarities end. The themes and ideas in both novels are vastly different in shape and scope. In A Time to Kill justice is the main theme and most of the ideas are focused on justice and the gray in between the lines of black and white set by the law, racial prejudice is also touched upon very frequently in the comparisons between Jake Brigance and Carl Lee Hailey and how he wouldn't even have had to face trial if he was a white man. In To Kill a Mockingbird justice is a theme which is not expanded upon or explained in nearly as much detail as it is in A Time to Kill. To Kill a Mockingbird also has a much larger variety in it's themes, ranging from the themes of justice to the exploration of a child's way of perceiving right and wrong as well as the idea of coming of age. These stories are honestly and objectively far more different than they are alike.
In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, many different themes come into view. One major theme that played a big role in the character’s lives is racial prejudice. Racism is an unending problem throughout the book. The song “Message from a Black Man” by The Temptations has many similarities to the theme of racial discrimination. Therefore, both the novel and the song prove that racism was a great obstacle for some people at a point.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
Many characters in this book try to buy things that they think will make them happy. For Tom, it was Myrtle, and for Gatsby, it was Daisy. Money only increased their problems, for instead of realizing that the thing they wanted would not satisfy them, they continued to push at happiness with money expecting results. At the end of the book, the reader comes to realize that happiness and love is one thing money can’t buy for most people. There are many examples of this throughout this book.