1. Describe and analyze the Etruscan temple as seen in the Model of a typical Etruscan temple (Figure 6-3). What materials were used? How are Etruscan temples similar to and different from Greek temples? The Etruscan temple seen in the model shows a tall building, with 8 columns in the front of the building that create an entrance to the temple, a large covering that creates a roof and extends to the sides. It contains roof made of tiles and on the top we can see statues on the corners as well as a bigger statue in the middle with open arms as if to symbolize welcoming. The temple was made of different types of materials that included wood, stone, tile and mud brick. The Etruscan temples were similar to Greek temples by the styles of the roof and the Doric styles in the columns. They were also different by the setup of the columns, size of the temples and materials used. 2. Compare and contrast the form and content of the Archaic Etruscan sculpture Apollo of Veii (Figure 6-4) to the Archaic Greek sculpture Anavysos Kouros (Figure 5-9). Note how their functions differed as well. The Apollo de Veii statue is …show more content…
seen wearing a pleated robe that hangs down its body. It seems to be standing against a column since we can notice that behind its legs. Apollo de Veii statue displays no arms but the way the arms are placed can resemble its arms where in open position. We can also notice the long braided hair under a cap and the colored face. The Anavysos Kouros statue, displays a very detailed nude body of Kroisos. We can see the muscles in legs, the detailed lines of bones in arms and knees. He stands will broad shoulders and hands in a fist position standing his ground. His displays a very serious look with a blank stare and his hair braids. Both statues differ in the materials used to create them, the color tone added, and the physical body sculpture. The statue of Apollo stands over a temple and Anavysos statue stands over the tombstone of Kroisos. 3. Address the significance of funerary art and architecture for the Etruscans. Include analyses of the Sarcophagus with Reclining Couple (Figure 6-6) and the frescos seen in the interior of the Tomb of the Leopards (Figure 6-1) in your response. In the Sarcophagus with Reclining couple sculpture we cans see a couple that is lying down enjoying the moment.
We can see the male in the sculpture is looking at the women in admirations as he places his hand on her shoulder. We can also see the females fingers bent like are she’s counting something on her hand. In the Tomb of the Leopards, the fresco painting depicts a celebration-taking place. In the painting we can see males and females enjoying and having a good time. We are able to see males playing instruments, drinking out of jugs etc. 4. The Capitoline Wolf (Figure 6-12) is this considered the best-known Etruscan sculpture, however its authenticity as Etruscan has recently been debated. Discuss the form and content of this sculpture and the related controversy as addressed in this Khanacademy essay (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site.. The sculpture of the Capitoline Wolf is displayed having a blank scare looked while it feeds infant toddler versions of Romulus and Remus who was 2 children who were found abandoned when they were young. We can easily see the lines of the ribs in the body of the wolf, which can make us think the physical condition if was in. On top of the wolf we can see scales that run along the legs and the eyebrows in v shape displayed a confused scared look. Underneath the wolf we can see the 2 young children, who are feeding off the wolf. Their bodies display well-nourished babies as we see the thickness in their legs, stomach and arms. There has been a debate about how authentic the sculpture was of the Etruscan period. Some of the areas that are questioned included the hollowness inside, the sculpture being one piece instead of two and displaying patterns of other time period. (www.khanacademy.org) 5. Describe and analyze the form and content of the late Etruscan sculpture Aule Metele (Figure 6-18). How do we see the “Romanization” of Etruscan sculpture? The Aule Metele is the statue of Aule Metele himself standing tall with his arm raised in the sky as if he is getting ready to speak to someone. He can be seen wearing a pleated robe, with boots and on the bottom of the robe can be seen scripture writing with a message. “His head, with its close-cropped hair and signs of age in the face, resembles portraits produced in Rome at the same time.”(Kleiner, Aule Metele) The shape and features given to his face display the aged look and as well as the slender shaped of head and neck. The sculpture is created in dark tone of bronze that was very common during the time of Etruscans. The Etruscan sculpture displayed “Romanization” by the traditional Roman attire, Aule Metele himself being a citizen of Rome, and display other traditional Roman features.
The durability of clay has brought forth an immense abundance of Greek pottery, a craft mastered by Athenian artists. Archeologists have found hundreds of varieties in creation, shape, function, style, and artwork in Archaic vases. The museum has been blessed with one of these priceless artifacts; it is the duty of this establishment to accumulate as much data as possible surrounding the vase. In first identifying technique, dimensions, and condition, as well as describing shape, ornament, and figural scenery, one may then begin to analyze the vase. This serves the general purpose of understanding where the artifact stands in Greek culture and history. Through the examination and research of figural scenes, it is then possible to compare these to other scenes and styles of the same and other painters. Finally, one can then hypothesize where, why, and how this piece was used.
Throughout the history of Ancient Greece thousands of great works of art were produced. Works were created in many different media, ranging from life-size statues to larger than life architectural structures. One type of art that can sometimes be overlooked, though, is pottery. There are many examples of great Greek pottery, but the two that will be used as a sample are Artemis Slaying Actaeon and Woman and Maid. By considering the backgrounds of these works, and comparing them directly we are able get a taste not only of the artistic styles of the time, but also a taste of ancient Greek culture.
The difference between an archaic statue such as Kroisos (fig. 5-11) and a classical statue such as Doryphoros (fig. 5-42) may not seem very great in a single glance. In fact, you may not notice any differences in that one glance. Yet, if you were to look at them closely, you can see that these two statues actually have very little in common.
The Ancient Egyptian sculpture, “Statue of Nykara and His Family”, was sculpted during the late fifth dynasty. The sculpture is a depiction of Nykara, his wife, Nubkau, and son, Ankhma-Re. The statue is in poor condition with pieces of limestone missing and chips on the three subject’s faces and bodies. The painted limestone shows the conventional colors for the male and female subjects. There is a clear discoloration among Nykara and his son’s bodies. The brownish red color they once were has eroded to a light yellowish color, which resembles the purposeful color of Nykara’s wife. The hieroglyphs on Nykara’s seat insinuate that the sculpture is meant to be viewed from the front view. This is also evident by the way the three subjects are facing forward in frontal view. There are hieroglyphs on both the chair and base of the statue near Nykara’s wife and son’s feet.
An analysis of Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II and Augustus of Primaporta, reveals that there are many similarities, but also many differences between these two pieces of sculpture. These similarities and differences are found in the subject, style, and function of both works of art.
There were buildings found with complex drainage systems and wide, paved streets, perfect for merchants, show sophistication unlike anything else from that time. The city was well planned and organized, and the size of some of the buildings indicate that they may have been used for religious or administrative purposes. The architecture is similar to that found on Crete, which is evidence of cultural diffusion between the two places, and their possible influence on each other. Crete-like architecture shows a trade route and influence from Crete, which means historians can find more connections between the Minoans on Crete and the Minoans in Akrotiri, which we would have not gained otherwise. From the buried city at the Akrotiri excavation site, we gained so much information about life in the Bronze Age, especially about their society and
The development of an empire is a change strongly emphasized in the Archeology as a radical departure from the Hellenic tradition, and consequently a major source of conflict among the Greeks. Prior to the adven...
Conlin, Diane Atnally. The artists of the Ara Pacis: the process of Hellenization in Roman relief sculpture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997. (P. 4)
Another difference in these civilizations is in the architecture of each region. The architecture of the Romans was also more advanced than that of the Greeks; they used concrete and placed emphasis on arches, vaulted ceilings, and domes while Greece emphasized balance and symmetry. Greek temples aimed at impressing by designing intricate, aesthetically pleasing outer views, while Roman architecture's goal was to impress by enclose a vast amount of space.
Metropolitan Kouros is a life-sized statuary marble sculpture of kouroi formed in the sixth century BCE. After that, The Spear Bearer(Doryphoros) is also a life-sized marble sculpture of a man made by Polykleitos in 450 to 440 BCE. Both sculptures are made of similar materials, and they are made in same country, but different period. In addition, their subject matters are a little bit different, and the styles of them are very different.
Bibliography:.. Bibliography 1) Bloch, Raymond. The Etruscans, New York, Fredrick A. Praeger, Inc. Publishers, 1958. 2) Bonfante,. Larissa. Etruscan Life and Afterlife, Detroit, Wayne State University Press, 1986. 3) Grant, Michael.
In modern society, Greek pottery is considered an art which is regarded as much for its aesthetic splendor as its historical significance. However, the role of pottery in ancient Greek culture was far more functional as its primary use was for the transportation and storage of such liquids as water and wine (Encyclopedia Britannica). Due to the durability of the fired clay material, Greek pottery is the only remaining art form that allows us to explore the evolution of this ancient culture. Through that examination, three distinct stylistic periods have been unveiled: Geometric, Orientalizing and Archaic. This analysis will detail these distinct periods as well as three design techniques prevalently used: black figure, red figure and white ground
3: art: denarius in Cyprus; to appreciate its texture, the kind of metal used, and to make an estimation of the period when it was first
The end of the Geometric period resulted in the beginning of the Orientalizing Period, dated between 700-600 BC. Within this time frame, Greek introduced a new innovation, the Peripteral Temple. For many years prior, a row of colonnade was used on the interior primarily to hold up the roof of the building. In contrast, columns are seen being used on the outside, creating a visual wall around the building exposing parts of the interior. With in the temple existed the megaron style, carried forward from Bronze Age homes. It was also in eastern influenced period, the first real stone temples, and terra cotta roof tiles came to exist to hold the weight on these new stone temples. The population grew drastically, introducing new techniques and styles, which blended to form designs with balance and symmetry. It was during this period, two major Greek designs were developed, the Ionic and Doric order. (Pedley, 2012: pg. 180) The Doric order, being the first and most simple, consisted of baseless columns placed closely together as the Greeks did not know how much weight the shortened columns could hold. Reason behind this was the lack of length in the columns were believed to hold less weight and therefore forced into being placed closer together. This closely set arrangement created a very bold statement in the Doric temple. The Capital, which sat on top of the concaved shaped shaft, was left plain but when grouped alongside others, suggested a bold harmony. In contrast, the Ionic order was less bulky and more delicate than the Doric order. The top of the capital is decorated with two scrolls, also known as volutes, which could have resembled a shell or animal horns. Above the capital, held room for a surrounding frieze depictin...
The painting depicts two figures, the one of a woman and of a man. The dominating central figure is the one of the woman. We see her profile as she looks to the left. Her hands are crossed in a graceful manner. She has blonde hair and her figure is lit by what seems to be natur...