Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is texting affecting teen literacy
Is texting affecting teen literacy
Is texting affecting teen literacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is texting affecting teen literacy
Texting Compare Contrast Essay
Introduction
With children’s increasing use of mobile phones, concerns have been raised about its influence on their literacy skills. One well-known feature of children’s text messages is that they do not always adhere to conventional written language rules and use a register. In this register, children make use of phonetic replacements, such as lol and drop words . This has led to the assumption that characteristics of textese may leak into children’s general writing, ultimately resulting in language deterioration . However, this is in sharp contrast to findings from several studies showing that children who used textese frequently did not
Michaela Cullington, a student, wrote a paper “Does Texting Affect Writing?” in 2010 for an English class. The paper is an examination of texting and the belief that it negative effective student’s writing. Cullington goes into detail about textspeak- “language created by these abbreviations”- and their use in formal writings. She organizes the paper in a way that is confusing to understand at first (pg. 1). At the end of the paper, she discusses her finding in her own research which comes to show that texting does not affect writing. But this is contradicting to the information she received from the teachers. The students and the teachers were seeing differences in the use of textspeak in formal writing. Cullington has good support for her
In the article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?”, the author Michaela Cullington conveys her speculation that texting does not correlate to how students write formal essays. At the beginning of the article Cullington introduces the term texting and the convenience texting brings. Later expressing her concern that the texting language “Textspeak” is actually affecting students writing; then contradicts these views by using primary and secondary sources (news articles, books, her own surveys and research). In addition, she uses an anecdote to tell of her own experience with texting and writing. Together with other evidences and research put together, she uncovers the debate between textspeak and formal writing. On the basis of her research, she concludes that the state of texting does not interfere with writing or writing abilities.
Three years ago, linguist John McWhorter spoke at a Ted Talk conference about whether texting is killing language and went so far as to question the definition of language itself. His video, “John McWhorter: Txtng is killing language. JK!!!” distinguished to the reader the difference between writing and speaking and how texting was one in the form of another. Texting, he said, is a way of writing as one speaks, or specifically fingered speech, rather than as many believe, a mutilated version of the English language. According to McWhorter, texting is becoming a second language for many people, and those who do text are actually, in a sense, being bilingual. Texting itself is not very different from a foreign language, other than for its strong
On the other hand, childhood psychology looks at the child internally, concerned with examining the mind and behaviour, from foetus to adolescence, influenced by hereditary and environmental variances.
My daughter Myla Jane and her cousin Braelyn Jade are different in appearance and attitudes, yet are the same in the things that they enjoy and their daily routine of everyday life. When you look at the two girls, you can’t tell by their looks that they would be anything alike. Although they are a lot different in looks, they do share similarities. When seeing these girls at a back-to-back view, the only things that you would find to be similar are their enjoyment of the same things and their routine they follow throughout the day.
Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.
“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.
The first similarity I observed after reading the books, is that both books are non-fiction, informational text. They both tell the process and/or procedure of how crayons are produced. Crayons are a piece of everyone’s childhood, often encouraging skills such as, social and peer interactions, following directions (e.g. color by number), and promote a child’s exploration and replication of their natural and social world, which surrounds them. Second, both books used real photographs to give the reader an acute, informational perspective of the tools, materials, and resources used when making crayons. This format allows the reader to gain direct “real world” insight, into how a crayon is made. Third, each book explained the different tools and materials used to make a crayon. For example, a young reader may not know what a
The use inventive spelling, abbreviations. As high school students start to use short texting, some of their grades dropped due to the spelling errors they make. So many teens get used to wing abbreviating that they just begin to write that that way. Some teenagers writing skills have turned into sentence fragments, because of the limited space they put into text sentence. In my research how does texting affect teen literacy the percentage was 64 percent of students who say they incorporated text language in their writing, 25 percent said they did so to convey have used text shortcuts a lot of students, vocabulary and grammar is also affecting their literacy. The outlook of the teachers is that. Text plus recently released results of its own survey of 1,214 teens that use their services. 43 percent of which have texted in class, they seem to pay more attention to their phone than what the teacher is teaching. They seem to have the phones that will spell the word for them so they have to worry about spelling. In the age of text message, where words are reduce to no stand abbreviating, symbols, But in my research I pointed out that technology has put new emphasis on reading and
Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R U Txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(1), 46-67. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?q=texting+spelling+grammar&id=EJ862013
Drouin, Michelle, and Claire Davis. “R u txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?.” Journal of Literacy Research 41.1 (2009): 46-67. Humanities International Complete. EBSCO. Web. 25 Oct. 2011.
Attending kindergarten means having more structure in a child’s young life, and they are ready for it after going to preschool. They have learned to socialize, follow simple rules, and stay on a task longer and longer. They are now ready for more intense learning; this is an opportune time for a teacher to harness the mind and still keep the fun and adventure of a kindergartener’s mind going.
A crucial part of English is speaking, listening, reading and writing as a collective. This forms the basis of English learning within and outside the classroom. Speaking is required for writing as ‘preparing to write by talking through ideas… help young writers to gather ideas before facing an empty page’ (2011, p3, Goodwin). Communicating with peers through speaking and listening can develop children’s ability to write, and through reading, children improve their imagination. Through modern technology children are now able to access English learning through personalised and adapted methods. Accessible technology such as ‘electronic texts can be programmed to adapt to an individual reader’s needs and interests during reading, which may in turn affect the strategies readers use to read and comprehend texts’ (2006, p108, Wray). This allows children to have a greater choice over the texts they choose to read and the interactivity between text and reader is increased. With information technology developing at its current rate, a large majority of children now have access to multimodal tech...
New technologies are transforming current literacies and literacy practices, whether intentionally or unintentionally these new technologies impact on literacy instruction in classrooms (Hagwood, Stevens and Reinking, 2003). Literacies and skills such as phonics, knowledge, vocabulary, comprehension, spelling, phonetic awareness and spelling are enhanced. Students build to build on these foundational literacies and skills in order to adopt and adjust to literacies of the future.
The amount of children having access to smart phones, or being given smart phones at a young age is becoming a more common practice. These children and teenagers are primarily using the devices to text message friends and using what is know as text speech (ex. Lol means “laughing out loud” or ttyl means “talk to you la...