Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Respond essay : why do we have too few women leaders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Respond essay : why do we have too few women leaders
These Ted Talk are given by Sheryl Sandberg (Why We Have Too Few Women Leaders), the current COO of Facebook, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (The danger of a single story), a novelist. In both Ted Talks, these women address the issue that relate to their place of expertise. Repeatedly throughout the Ted Talks, Sandberg and Adichie bring up the challenges and issues that are current in their place of work while also adding their personal stories and insight. As a result, they bring awareness to these issues to all those involved in that specific place of work; and they are able to effectively explain the points presented in the presentation. Also, through the personal stories and insight shared, both women allow their audience to see first hand …show more content…
By sharing this experience, Sandberg was able to expose to her audience how women are belittled and undermined in the workplace and how it results in women playing a much more passive role in their position, causing them to refrain from taking advantage of certain opportunities. Similarly, Adichie does the same. In her presentation, she includes an experience she had with a family from her homeland. As a result of her single sided knowledge of the family, Adichie passed false judgement on this family. From her story, Adichie exposed to her audience that having only a single sided knowledge on any situation blinds the individual from seeing the situation for more than that. While incorporating personal stories, both women introduced outside sources to help strengthen their arguments. Both Adichie and Sandberg introduce their sources by introducing the author, giving a brief background on them, then presenting the evidence they wish to use. I find this to be effective because by giving a brief background on the author, it demonstrates to credibility of the source. Additionally, the way they present their sources does not interrupt the flow of the presentation. They are able to intertwine their sources together and tie it back nicely to their original topic. It appears so
Women respond very well to tone and word choice, which Tannen uses to her advantage. She uses personal experience to relate with her more female audience. For example, in the criticism section she uses a scenario that occurred between a male and female editors. Tannen “appreciated her tentativeness” that she gave Tannen when wanting to cut out part of her story(301). In contrast to that her male editor gave her a much different response, saying “call me when you have something new to say”(301). By stating a scenario with two very different outcomes, she falls more bias to women. This is effective to her more female audience because it paints women in a positive light and paints the men in a very negative light. The obvious bias towards women can arguably hurt her more than it could help her. Tannen automatically outs her male audience at a very awkward side, and makes it impossible for them to feel sympathy towards her. This hurts Tannen’s opportunity for having a broad audience, but for what she wrote it for she is very effective. If we are simply talking about how effective it was for women then Tannen hit home with them. Tannen’s choice of using what men say is also very smart, and helps with her effectiveness. She heard a man say, that after working for two women he realized neither of them have a sense of humor(304). By using examples like these
Sandberg’s definition of a feminism is gender equality with an existing social system. She has transformed and made a positive impact for females in the workforce; inspiring and motivating them to achieve higher corporate jobs. At the beginning of her article Hook analyzes cause and effect by stating that feminist conjecture about a subject without firm evidence was only considered by academics for a long time and Sandberg is changing that idea. The “visionary feminist goal which is not of women running for the world as is, but women doing our part
Hillary Clinton’s speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton.
When speaker Brené Brown was about to give a talk, the event coordinator struggled with calling her a “researcher,” saying that people might not want to come because they would think she was “boring and irrelevant.” Instead, she wanted to call her a “storyteller” since she thought Brene´Brown’s story-telling abilities were a highpoint. Brown’s academic insecurity was not satisfied in simply being called a “storyteller.” She decided her qualitative research was, in actuality, collecting stories and concluded, stories, were “data with a soul.” She then embraced the title “Researcher-Story-teller,” which combined her unique abilities (Brown, 2010). Building our own personal brand is a combination of strengths; its “what makes us
Sheryl Sandberg came to Ted to give a speech in 2010. She had a story about her preschool daughter and asked Pat, the CEO if she could add it to her speech. Pat responded with “Absolutely tell that story.” That’s when Sandberg then realized she could help others especially, woman by being honest about her own experiences and challenges. Sheryl Sandberg says “I tried to be authentic and share my truth”. She also says “she feels short of doing it all and it felt good to not only admit it to others but herself.” When you give a speech you should always want to be authentic, open, and transparent. Allowing yourself to do this will allow the audience to listen and understand what you’re opening up about during the speech. If you’re not authentic
Chimamanda Adichie, in one of her eye-opening speeches, The Danger of a Single Story, provides the audience with a new insight into the negative impacts that can occur as a result of viewing a story from a single perspective and not putting in an effort to know it from all available viewpoints. Adichie in her simple, yet well-grounded speech, filled with anecdotes of her personal experiences effectively puts across her argument against believing in stereotypes and limiting oneself to just a single story using a remarkable opening, the elements of logos, pathos and ethos, repetitions, as well as maintaining a good flow of thoughts throughout the speech.
After Watching Carol Dweck’s Ted Talk I realized how our lives as students would be so much easier if schools used the “not yeat” technique except, it comes with some downsides because if you tell someone “not yet” it might defeat their confidence if they have tried several times before.
After watching Adichie’s TED talk “The Danger of the Single Story” and the film directed by Christopher Quinn God Grew Tired of Us, a main similarity within both of the media was addressing the stereotype misconceptions in parts of the world. Stereotypes exist all over the world and one misconception of one individual could later represent an entire population. In addition to stereotypes, Adichie expands the reasoning for these stereotypes to lie behind power. Meaning that an individual obtaining power has words that have the most impact and leaves that specific listener close-minded to their opinion. Adichie explains in the TED talk “The Danger of the Single Story,” Power is the ability not just to tell the story of another person, but to
Brian Little, an award-winning psychology professor explains the science behind personalities in his Ted talk, “ Brian Little: Who are you really? The puzzle of personality.” He is a professor at Cambridge University and his students often describe him as, “A cross between Robin Williams and Einstein.” Brian wrote the book Me, Myself, and Us: The Science of Personality and the Art of Well-Being. Brian uses his degree in psychology and the acronym OCEAN to explain the different characteristics of personalities in his TED talk, “Brian Little: Who are you really? The puzzle of personality.” In his Ted talk, Brian describes how the acronym OCEAN applies to the science of personality. He says, “ So “O” stands for “open to experience” versus those
On page 113 of “Writing Arguments” we can read, “arguments are often improved through the use of stories that make issues come alive or sensory details that allow us to see, feel, and taste the reality of a problem” (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson 113). Throughout Goldberg’s article we see her using examples from individuals that she has interviewed; getting their personal story and making it more real for the reader. Through this technique, readers find themselves to be more relatable to the writer because the article is now more personal. For example, in the article written by Goldberg, one woman talks about how she is afraid to publish articles or post to blogs for fear of backlash from the online community for having views that may be different from others that are also writing online (Goldberg 14). You see stories on the news of people being bullied and publicly humiliated online and this is what is going on with the feminist movement right now. Bloggers and activists are de-crediting others in their field due to comments and incidents on social media cites which make people afraid to voice their opinion. This is something that many readers may struggle with and can relate to so the writer is smart in bringing up this topic for
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie made numerous of valid points in her Ted Talks (2009), The Danger of a Single Story. She enlightened readers that incorrect information can travel through generations and never be corrected. She expressed that one single story is the gateway for judgement, and once you present a person as one thing over and over again that one thing becomes that person. Ms. Adichie explained that a single story creates stereotypes which are incomplete stories. A single story also provides a piece of a story that can be seen as the whole story, which develops misconceptions. Furthermore, it robs people of dignity and shines light on how we as people are different and not similar. Overall, we should educate ourselves so that we
Adichie presenting the speech was to inform the non-feminists that feminism is not all about anti-men. She uses her past stories to reflect on
Emily effectively transitioned into the content by starting off with the causes for insufficient punishment for criminals engaged in sex trafficking by giving multiple examples of victims and criminals through a few references. For example, The Washington Post and ABC News were sources she mentioned where she received her information from. Emily then transitioned to the effects of the lack of jail time for traffickers. Quiana casually led into the content of her presentation by mentioning the extent of hazing and then transitioned over to discussing the effects of hazing. She gave some examples and stated her sources, Texas State University and Hartwick College. Quiana applied a personal touch to this part of her presentation by mentioning her own exposure from a previous college she had attended. Both presenters transitioned into the solutions of their topics effectively by stating their bills and giving examples of what can be done. One example Emily gave was to encourage victims to testify and one example Quiana gave was to have students sign a
Renowned British actress and activist for the feminist movement, Emma Watson, in her speech to the United Nations, “HeForShe,” argues that gender discrimination is a plague to human civilization. Watson’s purpose is to sway the audience that gender inequality has to come to an end, with the support of men and women as advocates for egalitarianism. Additionally, she enlightens the audience that the problem originated from political affairs, the economy, and social disparity. Watson creates a compassionate tone in order to convey men, specifically those who negatively perceived feminism or did not think that feminist issues affected them. Nevertheless, Watson’s speech is ineffectively persuasive due to the poor description she formulated
Women leaders have the crucial soft skills of empathy, innovation, facilitation, and active listening (Masaoka, 2006). They also have first-hand life experiences that bring technical skills and experiences from the street level to the workplace (Masoka, 2006). Women often build stronger relationships with clients and outside contacts than their male counterparts. This relationship building skill, provides a key aspect which helps to move businesses forward (Giber et al., 2009). Fortune 500 companies with a high percentage of women significantly outperformed those with fewer women. Companies with the highest representation of women showed higher returns on equity than those with fewer women employees (Giber et al., 2009). Thus, future organizations may have a higher percentage of female leaders than we have experienced in the past. Future leaders must ensure that there is equality among the workforce and that women are accurately represented among the