Compare And Contrast Stephen A. Douglas's Violation Of The Compromise Of 1820 To 1860

255 Words1 Page

Stephen A. Douglas, an American Politician, wanting to appeal to his supporters, decided to create a northern transcontinental railroad route cutting through the territory of Illinois. However, there was one issue with this plan: the railroad with which it needed to cross through needed to be organized as a state. In attempt to gain the support of the South, Douglas combined the Kansas and Nebraska states where popular sovereignty would be practiced. This meant that instead of the state allowing or disallowing slavery, the people would decide whether slavery should be practiced. This act, known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, directly violated the Compromise of 1820, which stated that new states created above latitude 36°30’ would have to be free.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis of The Shattering of The Union by Eric H. Walther

    402 Words  | 1 Pages

    It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30´. Results of the Kansas-Nebraska Act were numerous and for the most part fatal to the country. The Act caused the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 to be virtually nullified, and caused compromising between the North and the South to be nearly impossible in the future.

    Read More

  • Summary And Slavery: The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise

    672 Words  | 2 Pages

    Congress was put in a tough position when Missouri applied for statehood, for they couldn’t have an uneven number of states. If they didn’t have an even number, they would have to come up with another idea to make slave states and free states equal, such as adding a state or neutralizing an existing slave state. Instead of making one of the existing twenty-two states neutral to slavery they accepted Maine as free state. The acceptance of Maine as it’s own state did not occur until 1820, but the addition of it did even the amount of slave states and free states to twelve and twelve. The Missouri Compromise did not only ban slavery from Maine and allow s...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Compromise Of 1877 Or The Tilden-Hayes Compromise

    98 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1877 or the Tilden-Hayes Compromise, resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election between Democratic candidate Samuel Tilden and Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes (Lecture). Democrats agreed that Rutherford B. Hayes would become president in exchange for the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and the granting of home rule in the South. President Hayes’ withdrawal of federal troops from Louisiana and South Carolina marked a key turning point in American history. Southern states swiftly passed laws alienating African Americans and implementing racial segregation and the era of Jim Crow started effectively ending the Reconstruction Era.

    Read More

  • The Compromises of the Founding Fathers in Founding Brothers byJoseph J. Ellis

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Founding Fathers were a revolutionary group, diverse in personalities and ideologies but shared the common goal of American liberty. They understood that the citizens should have a say in their government, and the government only obtains its power from the citizen’s consent. In order to avoid endless debates on issues that needed to be solved immediately, the revolutionary leaders compromised their beliefs. Joseph J. Ellis writes of the compromises that changed the constitutional debate into the creation of political parties in, The Founding Brothers. The 3 main chapters that show cased The Founding Brothers’ compromises are The Dinner, The Silence, and The Collaborators.

    Read More

  • The Similarities and Differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers played a major role in US History. They dealt with many problems in politics. The papers were made after the Revolutionary war. People started to worry that the government would not last under the Articles of Confederation. Without having a backup plan just yet, some delegates met up and created the Constitution. The constitution had to be ratified before it became the rule of all the land. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers discuss whether the constitution should be approved or not. Some things Anti-Federalist and Federalists argued was a strong national government, a standing army, and whether or not the constitution should be ratified and why.

    Read More

  • Sectional Compromises In The 19th Century

    1433 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are two mind paths to choose when considering the statement that the compromises of the 1800s were not really compromises, but sectional sellouts by the North, that continually gave in to the South's wishes. The first is that the compromises really were compromises, and the second is that the compromises were modes of the North selling out. Really, there is only one correct mind path of these two, and that is that the North sold out during these compromises and gave the South what it wanted for minimal returns. The three main compromises of the 19th century, the compromises of 1820 (Missouri) and 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 each were ways for the south to gain more power so that eventually, it could secede.

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Disquisition of Government by John Calhoun

    3726 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Disquisition of Government by John Calhoun was written as a document to primarily defend the ideologies of the South. It was a work of that elaborated on John Calhoun’s Political Theory, which mentions the idea of a “concurrent majority”, which is that a concurrent majority on an issue is one composed of an agreement of the most important minority interests in a society. He believed that a constitution having a majority behind it would protect people against the numerical majority. Calhoun tries to show in the Disquisition of Government, that a majority rule by equal and competent individuals counterbalances a minority rule for a society that has a balance of liberty, rights and power.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the first events that demonstrated Lincoln’s disapproval yet tolerance for slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, proposed by Stephen A. Douglas and signed by Franklin Pierce, divided the region into two territories. The territory north of the 40th parallel was the Kansas Territory and the south of the 40th parallel was the Nebraska Territory, the controv...

    Read More

  • What Were the Key Issues Leading To the Civil War?

    2033 Words  | 5 Pages

    As the country began to grow and expand we continued to see disagreements between the North and South; the Missouri Territory applied for statehood; the South wanted them admitted as a slave state and the North as a free state. Henry Clay eventually came up with the Missouri Compromise, making Missouri a slave state and making Maine it’s own state, entering the union as a free state. After this compromise, any state admitted to the union south of the 36° 30’ latitude would be a slave state and a state north of it would be free. The country was very much sectionalized during this time. Thomas Jefferson felt this was a threat to the Union.

    Read More

  • Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    369 Words  | 1 Pages

    As history reveals itself there is seen that America went through many obstacles to become what it is today. Along the way there were many compromises, Acts, laws etc. that were passed or revoked in order to make the U.S better for everyone. Some of these didn’t work out so well because they either were not necessary or they needed some adjustments. While some caused “explosions” in the nation others actually helped. So how did the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act impact us? Why were they implemented to begin with?

    Read More

  • Essay On Missouri Compromise

    454 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the first place, Henry Clay composed the Missouri Compromise as a method for dealing with a disparity in the nation; the document was a seemingly easy solution to a quickly growing problem, and although it kept peace between the North and South for a good thirty-four years, it was unable to prevent the inevitable Civil War like it was meant to. Before the Missouri Compromise was even a notion, the ratio of free states to slave states in the nation remained secure and balanced; two states, one free and one slave, entered the country at a time, keeping the peace between the two sides of both the nation and the Senate. Twenty-two states had already received a place in the Union before Missouri, an area soon to become a slave state, applied

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Compromise

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    This Compromise helped ease tensions for a while but the issue kept building on. Slave owners were frustrated because the Underground Railroad was successful which lead to slaves being able to escape and head north. Southern states agreed to admit California as a free state as an alternative but only if Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act, which required northern states to give, escaped slaves back to their owners. Congress overturned the Missouri Compromise and allowed each state to decide whether they wanted to be a slave or free state. It was necessary to compromise this issue because slavery was

    Read More

  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of Kansas

    1029 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stephan A. Douglas was the person behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. He made it to win southern support and to have Nebraska be made into a territory. Also, Douglas wanted to build a transcontinental railroad going through Chicago. This senator of Illinois strongly endorsed the idea o...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Essay On America's Second Revolution

    1481 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the majority of nineteenth century was a time of great economic growth. The South was the largest cotton supplier in the world, relying heavily on slave labor. Similar to the South’s boost in economy, the North was also flourishing. The North continued to make great advances due to the modernization of becoming completely industrialized. Although America had major economic advances as a whole, a race for power ensued. It became a battle of Slave states vs Free states. In order to have progress within the government of an equal amount of both slave and free states, compromise was inviable. The Compromise of 1860 and the Missouri Compromise are examples of this. As the country began to move west, Missouri wanted to become apart of America, they applied for state ship. However, the then territory identified as a slave state. Instead of denying persimmon to enter the country, the Union requested that Maine would be instated as a free state. This became known as the Missouri Compromise. A temporary solution, one that allowed both parties to remain

    Read More

  • Civil War Abolitionists

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both states entering as free states would throw the balance the Union already had going on, one free state for one slave state. So to keep the Southern states satisfied congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska acts. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise that said people living in the 2 states would get to vote on whether they would be slave states or not. When people from Missouri snuck their votes in to make the states slave states, the tensions between Southern and Northern states got even worse. A violent war broke out in Kansas between abolitionists and people who supported slavery. This of course added to the heated tensions that were already

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Stephen A. Douglas's Violation Of The Compromise Of 1820 To 1860

Open Document