Compare And Contrast Pax Sinia And Han China

845 Words2 Pages

During the periods of the Pax Sinica and the Pax Romana, the Han Chinese and the Roman Empire were alike in politics (both had a bureaucratic government), but differed in religion (Confucianism vs. polytheistic practices) and engineering (while both developed highly groundbreaking technology such as paper and running water, Han China made advances in practicalities, while Rome made advances in sophisticated daily living.)

During the period of the Pax Sinica, the Han Chinese continued the political practice of bureaucracy, which was instated by the Qin Chinese in about 250 BCE. A bureaucracy was a form of government in which the dynasty, in this case, places political power in hired state officials. The Han improved upon this system by allowing more freedoms to the population, which was brutally oppressed during the Qin dynasty. They also expanded the empire from Korea to middle Asia, which allowed more direct …show more content…

He did this because he wanted to avenge his adopted dad’s murder by the hands of the Senate. However, when Rome conquered places, they allowed these regions to continue living as they had before, if they pledged allegiance to the Roman Empire, and followed Roman law codes. To be sure that these rules were followed, Rome hired state officials to manage each region, and maintained the presence of Roman soldiers.

Both Han China and the Roman Empire maintained a bureaucratic system of government, and, although they had serious differences, such as the amount of bureaucrats and the amount of expansion within the civilization during the time of peace, both civilizations maintained some regional diversity (as long as allegiance was pledged to the ruling empire) and maintained fair law, which the state officials enforced and were also subject

Open Document