Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How history influences literature
How literature change the face of history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sheila and Mrs Birling are from a same wealthy family, with the relationship of mother and daughter, but they have different in characteristic and attitudes throughout the novel, which show the contradiction in ideology of different generations. Right at the beginning of the play, during the engagement, Sheila and Mrs Birling have already shown contradict in their view of life. Mrs Birling advocated for Gerald when he excused for his absence for all of the last summer; “ When you are married you’ll realize that men with important work to do sometimes have to spend nearly all their time and money and business. You’ll have to get used to that, just as I had.” She revealed her conservative thought, that men can put their work at the top, needn't …show more content…
However, Sheila was not influenced by her parent’s characteristics, showing a big change in ideology in Britain’s society in the early 20th century. With Eric, Sheila represents for the younger generation, fresh and ambitious. They're emotional, curious about life that they’re about to experienced. That describes for the compassionate Sheila giving to Eva Smith: ”But they are not cheap labour, they are people.” Both of the girl might be the same age, but they’re born in different family and situation. One was born in a wealthy, upper class family, growing up with a silver spoon , the other born in the working class, growing up with misery that has followed her entire her life but there are no barrier that can stop the painful emotion to touch Sheila’s heart, showing how she cares about Eva, understanding her life, although she has never suffered from lacking of money, worried about how she gonna live on the next day. However, the Mrs Birling shows a complete opposite view towards Eva Smith’s condition, she gave a snobbish comment to Eva: “Girl of that class”; there are no understanding given to other people from other classes life by her, instead of that, all she thinks about them are just prejudices. She was the last one who can save Eva Smith from her miserably life that had been turned up and down for too many times, and she just coldly refused her proposal for help, showing the naive and ignorance characteristics of her, although she works for the charity organization, which the main objective is helping women in disadvantaged circumstances. She applied her prejudices on the girl, and her lack of moral mind had decided to refuse the proposal, assumes that the father of the child and the girl were the ones who are responsible regardless the circumstance , although
Kingsolver develops the story of a strong young woman, named Taylor Greer, who is determined to establish her own individuality. The character learns that she must balance this individualism with a commitment to her community of friends, and in doing this, her life is immeasurably enriched. Many books speak of family, community, and individuality. I believe, however, that the idea that Barbara Kingsolver establishes in her book, The Bean Trees, of a strong sense of individualism, consciously balanced with a keen understanding of community as extended family, is a relatively new idea to the genre of the American novel.
The description of the house is a good example of how unsocial many families were during this time because all anybody, who was "anybody", wanted was to show how wealthy they were, and to climb the social ladder. I shall now talk about the characters themselves. Mr. Birling is described as being, "a heavy-looking, rather portentous man in his middle fifties with fairly easy manners but rather provincial in his speech. " He is a prosperous factory owner and is "a self made man". He follows all the capitalist traits of the time and works heavily under the capitalist business mentality, "build them cheap, sell them expensive".
This is the concept of collective responsibility. Priestley says, 'things could really improve if only people were to become more socially responsible for the welfare of others'. We have to confront our mistakes and learn from them. The play starts off with the Birling family celebrating their daughter's engagement to Gerald Croft. The family included Mr Birling, Mrs Birling, Eric Birling, Sheila Birling and Gerald Croft.
At the start of the play, we are introduced to the Birlings who are no
Birling is presented as a self-centred capitalist very early on in the play. His pleasure in the marriage of his daughter is purely for his own profit. "Now you've brought us together and perhaps we may look forward to a time when Crofts and Birling are no longer competing but are worki...
Priestley explores the relationships between men and women as he shows that the Birlings look at people's gender to judge them. Sheila is a representation of stereotypical girls during that time period, who obsess over pretty clothing and expensive things. As when she gets the ring, she describes it as "a beauty". Moreover, Priestley shows that men have a higher status than women and they make all the decisions as Sheila asks Gerald "is it the one you wanted me to have?" Furthermore, in the play, it's shown that the expectations of women were to act innocent and pure and that they should seek protection from "unpleasant and disturbing" things. In addition, Priestley shows the stereotypical traits of women as when Sheila gets sacked, it's because
Priestley mainly uses the characters in the play to present his views, especially Mr and Mrs Birling, to present his ideas about class and society. In the Birling family, Mrs Birling is the most upper class, and is always referring to the lower class female factory workers such as Eva Smith as ‘girls of that class’. She seems to think that working class people are not humans at all.
On overall, Priestley has presented the two characters, Arthur and Sheila Birling as completely differently. He wanted to match the story to the historical context of the 1910’s, but he has done this differently with Sheila. This is because the play was written in 1946 and the world had two wars and has started to comprehend the strength of community. She is the young generation of the 1910’s this means in a few years down the line, a war is going to break out and if they keep making the same mistake over and over again, it’s not going to turn out any better, by this, we see what happens in the second world war. This is why Sheila has been presented so that she understands consequences of what might happen if we don’t pull ourselves together.
Wells, both of whom references are made to in the opening pages of the play. A lot of the tension in the play is between Birling and the Inspector, both of who are powerful figures in the household and are both vying for dominance, creating a lot of tension. This is symbolic of the global struggle between capitalism and socialism, the Inspector represents Priestley's socialist views, and Birling, the antithesis of the Inspector represents capitalist views, which is made clear through his speech "the interests of Capital steadily increasing prosperity." When the Inspector is there, Birling is very fast to drop the blame on someone else, insisting "I can't accept any responsibility" which is a complete contrast of what the Inspector says, telling the family to "share the blame among yourselves when I have left" This constant conflict, which is often at the heart of the dramatic genre itself, makes sure there is tension whenever the two characters are talking to each other. This conflict is not the only one within the play.
In the play “An inspector calls” by J.B priestly, Mr Birling and Shelia Birling have contrasting attitudes to social issues. The author uses this to difference to highlight the diversity between generations and their reaction to situations faced. Arthur Birling is the father to Shelia Birling and is presented as the old fashion generation whereas Shelia is the young generation, who is more aware of the responsibility she has towards other people.The play begins with Mr birling and his family celebrating the engagement of Shelia and Gerald. The atmosphere is happy and light-hearted. Before the inspector arrives, Mr Birling is happy with life and himself “It’s one of the happiest nights of my life.” This shows that Mr Birling is quire selfish because he only thinks that it is one of the happiest nights of his life and not of Shelia and Gerald.
He uses the downfall of Eva Smith and a chain of events to demonstrate this. This leads to a very convincing and well-devised play, which puts across JB Priestley’s views clearly and precisely. In Edwardian Britain there was a great difference in the roles of men and women in society and the outlook of what and was not accepted differed substantially. A prime example of this in the play is when Mr Birling says ‘Nothing to do with you, Sheila.
...y is important. But the most important thing to note is that the weaker of the two did change her attitudes, beliefs and actions in order to become a better wife for her husband. Both women seem to be happy as do the men and like most conclusions of Shakespeare's plays, all the loose ends are tied up.
...udice in the social ladder. The Bennet family, although wealthy, was looked down upon, is relation to their social status. They were seen as low on the social ladder, because they had "new money." Lady Catherine, is another example of pride and prejudice displayed through social status, "Now and then they were honoured with a call from her ladyship, and nothing escaped her observation…" Lady Catherine noticed flaws in everyone and used her position and title of "Lady" to rise above everyone and make herself seem superior to them. Her position gives her pride and she flaunts it in a negative way.
In Jane Austen's novel, Pride and Prejudice, Austen reveals a sparkling comedy of love and marriage, wit, form, and feeling that achieve some type of balance between pride and prejudice. Mr. and Mrs. Bennett illustrate how comic characterization can be used to reveal different marital situations. Pride and Prejudice shows many aspects of marriage and demonstrates how one can make the most of their life regardless of the circumstances. Elizabeth and Darcy have discovered themselves through their differences and the loss of their pride and their prejudices. The traits pride and prejudice can be seen as desirable merits: self-respect and intelligence. Pride and Prejudice shows that human nature can be influenced by the society in which one subscribes.
The themes of aloofness and pride keeping people separate and prejudice causing people to make quick assumptions is what is paper is to address. Mr. Bennet’s aloofness caused him to neglect his daughters, which then further caused Lydia’s silliness that almost ruined the family. Mr. Collins is very prideful and his pride causes him so much ignorance that people think him a fool and he is never aware. Mr. Darcy’s pride causes him to appear cold which makes him unfavorable to the one he loves. These are all examples of pride and how they can be the downfall to characters. Prejudice is just as deadly; Mrs. Bennet is seen as a fool because she is a gossip and an extremely prejudiced person. Mrs. Catherine De Burgh’s prejudice combined with her pride make her an intimidating and unpleasant person in general, and of course, Lizzy’s prejudice and her first impressions of Mr. Wickham and Mr. Darcy bring her much heartache. Pride and prejudice are two qualities that people cannot entirely escape from, but one can be proud without being vain just the in the same way one can make observations without the harm of