Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference in the ancient civilization
Differences between ancient civilizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference in the ancient civilization
Mankind has lived in organized groups ever since 3000 B.C. when the first civilization was made. Each group had its difficulties like flooding and famine. They each had different responses to these problems, but they also had their similarities. Mesopotamia, Egypt and China were some of the first organized groups in the river valley civilization.
Mesopotamia believes in many gods which is called polytheism. Egypt also believed in many gods and goddesses, over 2,000 to be exact. Both religions believe that their gods control nature. The Egyptian god Ra created the world and controls the sun and for Mesopotamia, Ea controlled and protected them from floods. Mesopotamia and Egypt believe in life after death, but Egypt believes when you
…show more content…
Mesopotamia is between two rivers the Tigris and Euphrates. Egypt has a 4,100 mile long river called the Nile River. Flooding sounds bad in Mesopotamia but it is not. The two rivers only flood once a year, but they are unpredictable. Egypt also has early flooding, if it is a small flood it reduces crops and food. If it is a large flood it can destroy anything in its path.
China and Egypt had advanced societies. Egypt had two main parts to their society,
Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt. Then in 3000B.C. King Narmar unites to make Egypt first dynasty. Egyptian kings are considered gods, but they are called pharaohs not gods. In China they also have a dynasty which was formed in 2000 B.C., 1000 years after the Egyptian dynasty was made. The first ruler of the Chinese dynasty, which was named Xia Dynasty, was a man named Yu. The Chinese built houses out of wood while the Egyptians made their houses out of mostly stone. Egyptian social classes were based upon a pyramid, pharaohs were at the top while farmers and laborers were at the bottom. In China there social classes were kings and warrior nobles were at top the farmers were at the bottom. In China the richer lived in the cities and
The caste system played a great part in religion and philosophies as well. As shown in the graphic organizer, Father>son, older brother>younger brother. This supports the evidence of a caste system in china, not as strict as the caste system in Ancient India. The caste systems were separated by power, a father being more powerful than his son, and wife. His older son will have more power over the younger son, but the father has the power to control all of his sons. This was similar to the Indian caste system. Brahmins had more power over
Traditionally, the Confucian model of society was organized with the gentry at the very top, and the merchant as a class on the bottom (Brook, p. 134).
Although the kings of both lands were closely tied to religious institutions they had very different responsibilities to their people because of the culture of their location. The major point that differentiates Mesopotamia and Egypt is their location. The fact that Egypt was located in the most productive area of ancient times caused Egyptian pharaohs to focus more on their internal concerns, rather than gain new territories. The idea of Ma’at played a big role in the way of the pharaohs ruling over Egypt. Instead of expanding, they were more worried about having harmony and peace within the people, and keeping the balance of ma’at.
The bottom part of the society included the peasants which made up 85% of the population, the peasants was divided into sub-classes, and these sub-classes involved the farmers, craftsmen or artisans and merchants (Hackney, 2013). The highest ranking of the peasants were the farmers, farmers who owned their own lands were ranked higher than those who did not. After the farmers, there were the craftsmen or artisans. The craftsmen or artisans worked word and metal and some of them became well-k...
Egypt has one of the longest histories of any nation in the world. Written history of Egypt dates back to about 5,000 years, the commencement of civilization. While there is divergence in relation to Early Egyptian times, it is said that Egypt came to be around 3200 B.C., during the reign of a king by the name of Menes and unified the northern and southern cities of Egypt into one government. In 1675 B.C., Egypt was invaded by the Hyksos, people from the east, bringing along the very first of chariots and horses ever to come across Egyptian soil. Approximately 175 years later in 1500 B.C., the Egyptians had gotten rid of the Hyksos and driven them out. In 1375 B.C., Amenhotep IV had become the king of Egypt. During his reign he eliminated the worship of Egyptian gods and initiated the idea of only worshipping one god. But after his death, his ideas were retired and old ways were reestablished. Egyptian supremacy then started to decline around 1000 B.C. Between 1000 B.C. and 332 B.C., Egypt was ruled by many such as the Libyans, Assyrians, Ethiopians, and Persians. In 640, Muslims conquered Egypt and founded the city of Cairo in 969 and deemed it as the capital of Egypt. For many centuries Egypt was ruled by Muslim caliphs. A prominent ruler of this period was Saladin, who battled the Christian Crusaders at the conclusion of the twelfth century. In 1798 Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Egypt but was then forced to withdraw in 1801 Turkish and British armed forces. In 1805 Mohamed Ali began ruling Egypt till 1848 and great changed the country in terms of modernization and its military. During Mohamed’s conquest, he borrowed a lot of money from the French and British, which later resulted in Egypt’s coloniza...
Ancient Egypt and Ancient China often seem like polar opposites in almost every way. However, in one way, they are more similar than most people think. The beliefs of both of these civilizations were remarkably parallel, yet perplexingly different at the same time. Religion before 600 B.C.E. varied from society to society all around the globe, with just a few major religions taking hold in large areas. In both Egyptian and Chinese religions, they adhered to a polytheistic religion. Boths religions believed there were many gods who individually ruled over the many different parts of life, instead of one god ruling over all. Both Egyptian and Chinese cultures believed in life after death. Each one of these religions believed in some form of
China is a country that has traditionally had a clearly defined social hierarchy. The teachings of Confucius, the famous Chinese philosopher, embodied the Chinese social structure. He thought set roles and rank were vital for a society to function harmoniously. If an individual tried to deviate from their prescribed role, the country’s social order would be threatened. For centuries, China has had a citizenship comprised of 80% to 90% farmers, a small amount of specialized craftsmen, and a few elite families that controlled and drove society. Through the generations, the strictly defined roles of Confucius have died away, but his ideas of hierarchy are still ingrained in the Chinese way of thinking.
Society formed three main social groups. This new social pyramid is executed in Image 2 (Document 1: The Royal Standard of Ur). The mosaic artwork depicts three scenes stacked upon each other in horizontal strips. At the bottom men are burdened with heavy sacks of food on their backs. These people are apart the lowest social rank: workers and slaves. The picture above illustrates the second tier of the society are farmers, probably the middle class, as people leading animals and carrying fish. On the top is a king, large in size compared to the others in the image, and his subjects at a party enjoying drinks and live music. The main social classes were the wealthy and powerful, agriculturalists, and the lachrymose workers. Social status determined housing conditions. A clear example of social division is Image A: Early Egyptian City. The illustration is divided into two sections. On one side of the Egyptian city there are small, crude buildings conglomerated together. These buildings are inhabited by the poor. On the opposite side of the picture, the buildings are more defined and a majority are spread farther apart. Some buildings are even standing on an individual plot of land. This is the affluent part of the city. Those who were less fortunate lived shoulder to shoulder, while the rich lived separate from them in more spacious
In ancient China, kings ruled with the idea that the groups opinion was more important than the individuals, but it is the individual that makes up the group. The group did not represent the individuals, it represented that who had the highest social class. In a Chinese family women nor children’s opinions were expressed, the father was sole decision maker, others had no importance, because he held higher social class. In ancient China those whom possessed the majority of the land were nobles or kings, but they had no qualifications to be nobles or kings, some characteristic they held decided this for them, they didn’t necessarily have the traits of a leader, or were the most amiable people, they held the highest social class. Altogether, we have always grouped ourselves, whether it be positively or negatively, with or without reason it is human nature, to judge, and group
After the aristocracy came the military the military all the third on the social class was a very respected class there were two types of soldiers there were foot soldiers and warriors both were respected and what they did for the dynasty after the soldiers came the artists and craftsman is comprised of the middle class the largest contribution that they did was there work in the bronze industry bronze weapons were a major signifier of the Shang Dynasty the treasures that they made were often bought by the aristocracy at the bottom of the social class were the peasants the peasants made up the most prominent social class they made a profit from farming and selling crops archaeologists have found that many peasants were buried with the aristocrats this makes people believe that these peasants were the equivalent of slaves that were buried with the Kings have a lot of responsibility and a lot of privileges for instance they were able to have many many wives and they usually spent more time with the ones they favorite they also had a group of advisors with who they help them with making important issues and decisions. Right below the king came the generals the nobles and the workers first came the nobles this group consisted of the aristocracy and the noble family. The aristocracy and the nobles had certain responsibilities in from the gym just like the King Day although they answered right to. After this came the military and scholars. These were respected and held very highly.
Still atop the class ladder where the wealthy landowners and businessmen but following not as far behind as Southern poor-landowners, where the working class, and once more at the bottom where the poor. The prominent piece of this puzzle is the working class. These were the artisans, craftsmen, and traders that drove the economy, the very economy that drove them. This production based economy coupled with the developing cities is what would eventually lead the North into the industrial revolution, further changing the social structure of the North forever.
Although the people of both Lower and Upper Egypt believed in one creator who was referred to as the Ikka Nour, the two kingdoms referred to this religious figure by different names and meanings. In the northern kingdom, the Ikka Nour was known as “Ra”. Ra was associated with the sun giving rise to the quote “the sun that shines brilliantly everywhere”
The exquisite artifacts made of gold, carved out of hard stone or formed from glass might make us forget that the Egyptians lived with clay and not the expensive alternatives found in royal tombs. They lived in it, drank from it, cooked in it, ate on it, carried liquids in it, played with it, and when they died, the only offerings of any permanence most could afford were made from it.
China and India both have extremely rigid social structures. They have noticeable similarities of individuals being considered higher than another. In India, the caste system was created by the higher class to restrict the lower classes by their amount of education, freedom and way of thinking (Dushkin Scheduled Policy in India). China's social system varied from India by not creating as a strict social ladder. It had a simple structure with only four social classes compared to the 25,000 sub castes India had at one point. Even though China did not have such a strong social structure, there were still people considered “higher” than others. Bureaucrats and landowners were considered to be of a higher class than traders, farmers and peasants.
Chinese cultural history is riddled with signs of Confucian thought. Ancient Chinese society defined success by occupation rather than a person’s wealth. According to traditional Confucian thought, there were four main social classes based on occupation. The businessmen, or Shang, were at the bottom of the societal structure. Above the businessmen were the workers, or gong. Second from the top were the farmers, or nong. At the top of the hierarchical structure was the Shi, or scholars (Park & Chesla, 2007). The Shi were considered the highest class because their decisions influencing the whole society, or “mental labor (Hui-Chen Huang).”