Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Puritans different from native americans
Puritans different from native americans
Relationship of puritans and native americans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Puritans different from native americans
The Americans had many problems with the Native Americans during the Colonial period. Sometimes the Americans were even taken as captives by the Indians. In New England alone, an estimated 1,641 with captives were taken between 1675 and 1763. Among two of these were Mary Rowlandson and James Smith. Mary Rowlandson was a reverend’s wife from Massachusetts during the seventeenth century and James Smith was cutting a wagon trail in Pennsylvania during the eighteenth century. Even though they were both taken to be used in the Indian villages, because of their gender, their time with the Indians differed greatly in how they were treated and how their thoughts of the Indians were influenced. Mary Rowlandson was captured and spared to live during King Philip’s war in 1676. The Indians came to her town, burned buildings, and …show more content…
killed most of the people. She and her baby were shot in the side by one of the Indians before they were captured. James Smith was making a wagon road in 1755 when he was captured and spared to live. The Indians killed and scalped the other man he was with. Each of them played very different roles in the Indian civilizations. Indian men were to become farmers or blacksmiths, and Indian women were to become housewives, in keeping with European American concepts of "civilized" divisions of labor. Mary Rowlandson was used as a servant in the Indian tribe. An Indian squaw, who had a title similar to the Queen, named Weetamoo was her mistress. The Indians moved nineteen times while she was held captive. Rowlandson was used to do the everyday woman’s work. The Indian women’s jobs were typically cooking, hauling water, washing dishes, making household items, including pottery and clothing; and child rearing. Many of the Indians would also ask her to make them articles of clothing and in return, they would give her food or other essential items. She was clearly an outsider because she was not considered an Indian. The Indians treated her aggressively and would not grant her any freedom. Once, she was nearly beat to death by her mistress because she had been in another wigwam looking for food. She did not have many good encounters with the Indians while she was there and because of this she deemed them as savages. Unlike Rowlandson, Smith had a relatively easy time with the Indians. He was almost immediately adopted into the tribe and was considered one of them. The usual object in thus adopting a prisoner was that he might fill the place of someone who had died. Which was the case for James Smith. He was used in the tribe to do the men’s work. Men were responsible for hunting, defensive and aggressive warfare, manufacturing of weapons, and nearly all society wide political and religious operations. They trusted him go on hunting trips miles away from the society and was even rewarded a rifle for staying alive after being lost for a couple of days. He was always treated nicely and was never once beaten. In contrast to Rowlandson, Smith rarely starved, because the Indians shared all they could with him. Because he had such great experiences with the Indians, he considered them to be good people, and even family. Mary Rowlandson greatly disliked her captors and found it very difficult to sympathize with the Indian.
An example of this is when her master’s child passed away, and she was just grateful for the extra room that was in the wigwam now. During the Third Remove, while Rowlandson’s child was dying, the only comfort she had was the Indians’ offerings to “quickly knock [her] child on the head” and to this she said they were miserable comforters. However while she was held captive, she only had one truly kind and comforting experience with the Indians. This was when the old squaw told Rowlandson could lodge in her wigwam, and gave her a mat to lay on and a rug to put over her. Because she was a Puritan woman, she was probably led to believe that she was superior over the Indians, making it more difficult to accept them. She did not like the fact that the work the Indian women did could just about equal the work the men did back in New England. Rowlandson felt she was much more civilized than her captors. Mary Rowlandson’s views on the Indians are obviously show through her writings, as she used derogatory terms, referring to them as heathens and
savages. Unlike Rowlandson, Smith did not feel superior over the Indians. He saw everyone as equal. This could be because he was adopted to fill a spot of a deceased male in the tribe. The Indians performed a ceremony in the water and “every drop of white blood was washed out of [his] veins”. Smith felt compassion and respect for the Indians. At one point he was tempted to run away because he was so starved but dismissed the thought because he was “tenderly concerned” to let them “parish with hunger”. So he packed up all the meat he could and brought it back to the Indians. Smith respected the Indians and the Indians respected him in return. He was given much more freedom than Rowlandson, which left him with a kind heart and no hard feelings towards the Indians. A major difference in the experiences Mary Rowlandson and James Smith faced was because of gender. It determined the freedom, treatment, and title that was given to them. These factors help shape and reflect their views of the Indians. The treatment because of their gender encouraged judgment of the people around them and affected their view.
During slavery there was nothing, no law, to stop a white male from raping a slave woman that lived in his plantation. As a result of this a lot of slaves were raped with no one being able to do anything about it. The narratives of both Harriet Jacobs and Elizabeth Keckley narrate how their slave owners abused them sexually. Jacobs was a house worker and her parents were also slaves, his father was part of the skilled workers group. Keckley was a house and field worker and her parents were also slave field workers. Both of them were daughters of slaves, owned by a rich white plantation owner and both were women. Now there was only one difference that Harriet Jacobs had a lighter skin complexion that Elizabeth.
There are various things that make up a piece of literature. For example: choice of diction, modes of discourse, and figurative language. Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano were great examples of authors that used these elements of literature. There are similarities and differences in A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson and From Africa to America. Though Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano shared similarities in experiences, they had different writing personalities, purposes, attitudes, tones, and relations with their communities.
In the times of colonies when land was untouched there was a distinct hatred between the native Indians and the new colonists. As one reads the essay: A True History of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, written by Mary Rowlandson in 1682, one will understand this hatred. Although the Indians captured Mary Rowlandson, with the faith of God she was safely returned. The reader learns of her religious messages and how she turns to God for safety and strong will. One sees how her Puritan beliefs are of the strong New England Puritans way of life. The reader also understands through her words how she views the Indians and their way of life.
In “A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson,” Mary Rowlandson, a Puritan mother from Lancaster, Massachusetts, recounts the invasion of her town by Indians in 1676 during “King Philip’s War,” when the Indians attempted to regain their tribal lands. She describes the period of time where she is held under captivity by the Indians, and the dire circumstances under which she lives. During these terrible weeks, Mary Rowlandson deals with the death of her youngest child, the absence of her Christian family and friends, the terrible conditions that she must survive, and her struggle to maintain her faith in God. She also learns how to cope with the Indians amongst whom she lives, which causes her attitude towards them to undergo several changes. At first, she is utterly appalled by their lifestyle and actions, but as time passes she grows dependent upon them, and by the end of her captivity, she almost admires their ability to survive the harshest times with a very minimal amount of possessions and resources. Despite her growing awe of the Indian lifestyle, her attitude towards them always maintains a view that they are the “enemy.”
Jamestown, Virginia, is a crucial source of legends about the United States. Pocahontas, a daughter of an Indian werowance married an Englishman named John Rolfe and changed her name to Rebecca. In her article, “Gender Frontier”, Kathleen Brown underscores gender role and responsibility in both Native American and English settlers. Gender frontier is the meeting of two or more culturally specific system of knowledge about gender and nature. She also stresses the duties that they played in their societies prior to the arrival of the English people in the early colony in Virginia. Brown describes the difference values between Europeans and Native Americans in regards to what women and men should and should not do and the complex progression of
Slavery in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries consisted of brutal and completely unjust treatment of African-Americans. Africans were pulled from their families and forced to work for cruel masters under horrendous conditions, oceans away from their homes. While it cannot be denied that slavery everywhere was horrible, the conditions varied greatly and some slaves lived a much more tolerable life than others. Examples of these life styles are vividly depicted in the personal narratives of Olaudah Equiano and Mary Prince. The diversity of slave treatment and conditions was dependent on many different factors that affected a slave’s future. Mary Prince and Olaudah Equiano both faced similar challenges, but their conditions and life styles
The small community of Hallowell, Maine was no different than any other community in any part of the new nation – the goals were the same – to survive and prosper. Life in the frontier was hard, and the settlement near the Kennebec Valley was no different than what the pioneers in the west faced. We hear many stories about the forefathers of our country and the roles they played in the early days but we don’t hear much about the accomplishments of the women behind those men and how they contributed to the success of the communities they settled in. Thanks to Martha Ballard and the diary that she kept for 27 years from 1785-1812, we get a glimpse into...
“The Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson”, arguably the most famous captivity tale of the American Indian-English genre, is considered a common illustration of the thematic style and purpose of the English captivity narrative. As “the captivity genre leant itself to nationalist agendas” (Snader 66), Rowlandson’s narrative seems to echo other captivity narratives in its bias in favor of English colonial power. Rowlandson’s tale is easy propaganda; her depiction of Native American brutality and violence in the mid-1600s is eloquent and moving, and her writing is infused with rich imagery and apt testimony that defines her religious interpretation of the thirteen-week captivity. Yet can a more comprehensive understanding of Rowlandson’s relationship to Indians exist in a closer reading of her narrative? As “captivity materials . . . are notorious for blending the real and the highly fictive” (Namias 23), can we infer the real colonial relationships of this captivity in applying a modern understanding of economic, political and cultural transformations of American Indians?
...ve Indians. From the copious use of examples in Winthrop's work, and the concise detail in Rowlandson's narrative, one can imbibe such Puritans values as the mercy of God, place in society, and community. Together, these three elements create a foundation for Puritan thought and lifestyle in the New World. Though A Model of Christian Charity is rather prescriptive in its discussion of these values, Rowlandson's captivity narrative can certainly be categorized as descriptive; this pious young woman serves as a living example of Winthrop's "laws," in that she lives the life of a true Puritan. Therefore, both 17th century works are extremely interrelated; in order to create Winthrop's model community, one must have faith and closely follow Puritan ideals, as Rowlandson has effectively done in her A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson.
The General History of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles by John Smith, portrays the enormous troubles the settlers were faced with by the Native Americans. He explains how he was captured by Indians and also saved by a young Native American girl, Pocahontas. He vividly describes the ceremonies and rituals of the Natives performed before his execution. However, the execution never occurred due to the tremendous mercy showed by the king’s daughter who blanketed John Smith’s body her own. Pocahontas went on to persuade the Native Americans to help the settlers by giving them food and other necessities. Despite her efforts to reach peaceful grounds, her people were still bitter and planned an attacks on the colony. Nevertheless, Pocahontas saved them once again by warning the settlers of attacks. Pocahontas went on to marry an Englishman and traveled to England. She resembled the prosperity and good that was to be found in an untamed land.
Rowlandson was a pure puritan and like any puritan writer, she chose to write about her religious beliefs, hardships, and God. During her captivity, which she writes about, her faith never breaks. In February of 1675, Rowlandson’s small town was invaded by Native Americans who captured twenty-four people and destroyed the town. She was separated from
Mary Rowlandson was a pretentious, bold and pious character. Her narrative did not make me feel sorry for her at all, which is strange since she really did go through a lot. During the war, the Narragansett Indians attacked Lancaster Massachusetts, and burned and pillaged the whole village. During the siege Mary and her six year old child were shot, she watched her sister and most of her village either burn or get shot. She was kept as a captive, along with her three children and taken with the Narragansett’s on their long retreat. The exposition of the story is set immediately. The reader is perfectly aware of Missus Rowlandson’s status and religious beliefs. She constantly refers to the Narragansetts in an incredibly condescending way, to the point that you know that she does not even consider them human. She paints them as purely evil pe...
Interestingly although she feared and reviled the Indians she states that not one of them offered the least abuse of unchastity to her. Her captors never sexually molested or violated her. Rowlandson learned to adapt and strove to make it thought her captivity alive. She learned how to gather food for herself. Tolerate the ways of the Indians, and make clothes for the tribe. She even decided to stay with the Indians when given the chance to escape. “Rowlandson refused them choosing to stay put and let God choose when she was fully redeemed and ready to be released”
There has been a drastic transformation in the importance of American women and their roles in the last four centuries. The freedom and equality that women possess today was not present in the 1600s. Americans viewed women as a minority and treated them with contempt. Unlike Americans, Native Indians treated their women and the colonial women they kidnapped with more respect, granting them with more pleasant and important tasks. Due to the gratitude, more opportunities, and roles the Native Indians provided, the colonial women chose to remain with their captors instead of departing back to their families.
In her account, A Narrative of the Captivity and Restauration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, Rowlandson